GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Now the rest of the story - about alternators
Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228683] Wed, 06 November 2013 17:48 Go to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
If you get an alternator serviced or buy parts on your own, make sure that the regulator is one that is a replacement for the Delco number 1116387. That number had been discontinued for years, but replacements from Delco and others are out there.

Some of you may remember that I got my alternator serviced in Baton Rouge on the way to Dothan. The regulator went bad. This neat guy in Baton Rouge broke it down (I had taken it out in his driveway), checked the original regulator and while it sort of worked (then) it got real hot real fast. While he was looking at that regulator, he mumbled something about it being one for external excitation. It now occurs to me that he might have meant external sensing. The one he put in was not.

I put it back in and got 13.4 in the system right away and it built to 13.6. (Beats nothing by a bunch.) That was the best we ever saw for the rest of the summer. In case you haven't grabbed that, you can charge the house bank from half gone to full charge with 13.6, but it will take you DAYS to do in. It will not happen in a normal driving day of something like 8 hours. This just one reason why a PD92xx works so well.

Well, I put in the Chinese part that I got somewhere this afternoon, and now it fires up at 14.4. Much the betterer. We put more hours on the APU this season than we had in the three prior and most of that was just to charge the house bank. I'm looking to not do that again this next season.

Speaking of regulators, I have an old three battery coach. During a hot weekend of dry camping, the APU battery got so depleted that it would not crank the monster. So, I screwed in the jumper I put in the system just for such eventualities and got the APU battery back up and just kept an eye on it from then on. I finally got to do the complete and through diagnostic on it yesterday. That expensive little Prestolite rectifier/regulator had gone out, not completely, but not enough left to do any good. It took some persistence to catch it failing... Fortunately, there was one on the other BF (4kW Onan) I was given.
Good news, that one is good.
Bad news, it is the same part (exactly) that I have failed on two out of three Kohler engine small tractors.
I can buy a replacement by part number for 109$us.
I can buy something that looks like the old one for 45+$ on E-bay.
I can buy something that does the same thing but is a very different package for 20$.
Guess which I'm going to do.

Those were the two things that I really I wanted to get done before I brought Chaumière in for the winter's work.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228687 is a reply to message #228683] Wed, 06 November 2013 18:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
If I understand you correctly, You ran all summer on a one wire (no remote sensing) alternator. Yuk!

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228689 is a reply to message #228687] Wed, 06 November 2013 18:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Ken Burton wrote on Wed, 06 November 2013 19:10

If I understand you correctly, You ran all summer on a one wire (no remote sensing) alternator. Yuk!

Well, There were Two wires there, (actually three - non-sense, the light and the big one) but the wrong regulator was just ignoring the one that was supposed to be telling it to bump up a little.

¡Yuk! is not an inaccurate assessment.

I tried to make up by putting a jumper with a wing nut on the isolator so I could strap out that diode when we needed to build the house bank back up. We needed that some times because we were not going to be where there was shore power that night.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228693 is a reply to message #228689] Wed, 06 November 2013 18:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Is Yuk!, Yuk! a better assessment?

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228694 is a reply to message #228683] Wed, 06 November 2013 18:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rcjordan   United States
Messages: 1913
Registered: October 2012
Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
Senior Member
>I can buy a replacement by part number for 109$us.
>I can buy something that looks like the old one for 45+$ on E-bay.
>I can buy something that does the same thing but is a very different package for 20$.

>Guess which I'm going to do.

Umm, arbitrage?


SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228712 is a reply to message #228683] Wed, 06 November 2013 20:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cbryan   United States
Messages: 451
Registered: May 2012
Location: Ennis, Texas
Karma: 3
Senior Member
The $20 one. Because it might last much longer and we all like doing things for the last time. The others have had their chance to be reliable. No R&D value in replacing the part. Again.



Carey from Ennis, Texas 78 Royale, 500 Cadillac, Rance Baxter EFI.
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228720 is a reply to message #228683] Wed, 06 November 2013 21:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bobby5832708 is currently offline  bobby5832708   United States
Messages: 237
Registered: November 2006
Location: Winter Springs FL
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Matt,

The regulator that did 13.6 volts, is that at-the-battery voltage (after the isolator voltage drop) or at-the-alternator-output-terminal voltage?

Reason I'm asking is I've wanted to lower my charging system voltage from the current 14.2 down to the mid-13's and this may just be what I've been looking for. I don't use a diode-type isolator, I've got a homemade combiner that parallels the batteries when the 455 is running so I don't need to compensate for the .7 volt drop across the isolator with remote sensing.


Bob Heller
2017 Winnebago 29VE
Winter Springs FL
Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228724 is a reply to message #228720] Wed, 06 November 2013 22:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I don't need to compensate for the .7 volt drop across the isolator with
remote sensing.

If you connect the alternator directly to the engine battery, there is no
.6 volt drop..


--
> Bob Heller
> 1974 X-Canyonlands 26ft
> Winter Springs FL
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #228751 is a reply to message #228720] Thu, 07 November 2013 09:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
bobby5832708 wrote on Wed, 06 November 2013 22:05

Matt,

The regulator that did 13.6 volts, is that at-the-battery voltage (after the isolator voltage drop) or at-the-alternator-output-terminal voltage?

Reason I'm asking is I've wanted to lower my charging system voltage from the current 14.2 down to the mid-13's and this may just be what I've been looking for. I don't use a diode-type isolator, I've got a homemade combiner that parallels the batteries when the 455 is running so I don't need to compensate for the .7 volt drop across the isolator with remote sensing.

Bob,

The automotive standard for the system voltage of a running vehicle is 14.5V +/- 0.25V. (An SAE specification, but I do not recall the number.) This is the value used to establish lamp life and power consumption of accessory equipment. It will cause so out some gassing of 1.260/1.270sg LA batteries, but that is unavoidable if one wants to get back to full density in less than a day.

There are external regulators available (not inexpensive) that I have used in very special marine applications that have an a programable (adjustable) set point. Some of those are single stage. The low volume of demand makes then relatively costly.

With the wrong regulator, the alternator output was ~14.7. The whole reason (as Gene noted) for the external sense is to compensate for the diode drop and line loss. This regulator was not doing that so we could not charge the house bank to full with the main engine alternator with any amount of engine time.

It is not clear what you think you will gain by dropping the reducing the system voltage to ~13.5 V. If you look at the data, you will find that the recharge time from 50% to full density for a terminal voltage of 13.5 is about at 30+ hours. I now have personal (very personal) experience that this is pretty much accurate.

We need to talk about what it is you want to accomplish, but I bet we can either come up with a cost effective means or talk you out of it all together.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229592 is a reply to message #228683] Tue, 12 November 2013 19:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bobby5832708 is currently offline  bobby5832708   United States
Messages: 237
Registered: November 2006
Location: Winter Springs FL
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Matt,

My thinking is that since I start with fully charged batteries because the GMC is almost always plugged in I really don't need to hold the running voltage at 14.4 to make sure they are charged, that just leads to excessive gassing and battery heat, especially since I am always driving in Florida where it's usually warm and many times take trips of a few hours at a time in that warm weather. Ideally I would like to make the alt output be about 13.8 but I don't want to spend any appreciable amount of money to do this. A $10 voltage regulator I might consider but no more than that.

I can understand the 14.4 volts on a car where the alternator is the only method of charging the battery but since my GMC batteries are kept 'topped up' by the PD converter it's a different environment.

So, would I gain any battery life by not keeping them bubbling along at 14.4 volts?



Bob Heller
2017 Winnebago 29VE
Winter Springs FL
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229622 is a reply to message #228683] Tue, 12 November 2013 23:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
""I put it back in and got 13.4 in the system right away and it built to 13.6. (Beats nothing by a bunch.) That was the best we ever saw for the rest of the summer. In case you haven't grabbed that, you can charge the house bank from half gone to full charge with 13.6, but it will take you DAYS to do in. It will not happen in a normal driving day of something like 8 hours. This just one reason why a PD92xx works so well.

Well, I put in the Chinese part that I got somewhere this afternoon, and now it fires up at 14.4. Much the betterer. We put more hours on the APU this season than we had in the three prior and most of that was just to charge the house bank. I'm looking to not do that again this next season.
""

Matt, an appropriate charge voltage for this type of alternator/vehicle is 13.8 to 14.2 depending on engine speed and of course temperature. This can vary a lot between manufacturers. Voltage on modern vehicles is controlled by the powertrain computer and can vary wildly based on fuel economy strategies.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229629 is a reply to message #229622] Wed, 13 November 2013 02:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Bob de Kruyff wrote on Tue, 12 November 2013 23:00



Matt, an appropriate charge voltage for this type of alternator/vehicle is 13.8 to 14.2 depending on engine speed and of course temperature. This can vary a lot between manufacturers. Voltage on modern vehicles is controlled by the powertrain computer and can vary wildly based on fuel economy strategies.



Those are the numbers I always went with - 13.8 to 14.2. I monitor the voltage on several vehicles that I drive and I find that the engine computers usually run higher voltages when cold. As an example tonight mine was at 14.1 on my cold Colorado at 21 degrees OAT). Hot they get as low as 13.8 or 13.7.

That is my story and I'm sticking with it.

Honda has something called ELD. (Electronic Load detector) I'm not sure exactly how it works except they dial down the voltage after a while to improve gas mileage. I do know they also sense current draw to raise and lower the voltage. This really screws up the kids with their aftermarket radios and boom boxes if they do not attach them correctly to the system. There are lots of forum reports of dead batteries on Hondas after installing aftermarket radios.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229656 is a reply to message #228683] Wed, 13 November 2013 08:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Dead Hondas and dead boom boom stereos is a bad thing? NOW if they could make the computer sense the non OEM coffee can muffler on the 4 banger and shut it down, that would be great!

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229663 is a reply to message #229592] Wed, 13 November 2013 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
bobby5832708 wrote on Tue, 12 November 2013 20:26

Matt,

My thinking is that since I start with fully charged batteries because the GMC is almost always plugged in I really don't need to hold the running voltage at 14.4 to make sure they are charged, that just leads to excessive gassing and battery heat, especially since I am always driving in Florida where it's usually warm and many times take trips of a few hours at a time in that warm weather. Ideally I would like to make the alt output be about 13.8 but I don't want to spend any appreciable amount of money to do this. A $10 voltage regulator I might consider but no more than that.

I can understand the 14.4 volts on a car where the alternator is the only method of charging the battery but since my GMC batteries are kept 'topped up' by the PD converter it's a different environment.

So, would I gain any battery life by not keeping them bubbling along at 14.4 volts?

Bob,

Running the house bank at a lower density will increase the life as long as you still keep to the rules of letting the density of the electrolyte ever get below 1.200. Below that level is where the sulfur can get locking into the lead.

For what you want, the wrong regulator would work. But you will never be able to fully re-charge the house and main engine batteries. Even if you then go to a combiner in place of an isolator, you will not have the terminal voltage to get there in a full day's driving.

It should not be too difficult to find a regulator that does the 14.4 and no remote sense for a 10si (what we have) alternator. Actually, the GM/Delco alternators used an identical form factor regulator until very recently.

I'm not sure what I did with the one I just took out. I don't think I pitched it.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229669 is a reply to message #229622] Wed, 13 November 2013 09:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Bob de Kruyff wrote on Wed, 13 November 2013 00:00

Matt, an appropriate charge voltage for this type of alternator/vehicle is 13.8 to 14.2 depending on engine speed and of course temperature. This can vary a lot between manufacturers. Voltage on modern vehicles is controlled by the powertrain computer and can vary wildly based on fuel economy strategies.

Bob,

You are seriously correct about that. Not only that, but they hold the huge alternators used in modern vehicles off until the idle stabilizes so they don't stall the engine. Kind of like how our belts squeal when doing a cold start with the house bank down.

(I am not sure if it is Hitachi or Nipon/Denso that makes a 200 amp unit in a passcar size frame - not the Leece-Neville monster. And I heard recently that someone is looking at liquid cooling the machine and going higher than that.)

If I had both the reason and the cash, I would put in an alternator and regulator of the type I used buy for owners of performance cruisers (before the depression). That is one Gonzo-Mama alternator and a programable regulator. It will not only hold the field off (leaves enough for the tach to read) for a preset time, but then can limit the output to whatever the alternator belt(s) can take and then will ramp the terminal up with the charge so you don't get the lagging charge rate as the bank voltage comes up. In-short, these things a PD style regulator for a main engine alternator. And, Yes, it can even have a "burp" in the cycle.

There is a whole lot of neat stuff out there if you have the money to buy it.


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229677 is a reply to message #229669] Wed, 13 November 2013 10:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
""There is a whole lot of neat stuff out there if you have the money to buy it. ""

I hear you!


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229689 is a reply to message #229592] Wed, 13 November 2013 11:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Bounds is currently offline  Jim Bounds   United States
Messages: 842
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Bob,
 
You are describing your real world driving situation-- I am with ya and is pretty much the same way I use my coach.  In fact, mine stays here at the shop plugged in so much I could probably replace mine with motorcycle batteries!  We really should run them down periodically them charge them back up but hey, thats in that perfect world none of us have.
 
If one of these guys dry camp all the time, they will want different stuff than what you and I have.  I usually recommend folks put 2 marine style deep cycle batteries on an A/B selector switch.  That way they will be able to use one then the other one, charge them seperatly if needbe, have 2 shots at having power and when it's parked can seperate and turn the batteries off entirely.  I also add a "combine" circuit between the engine and living area batteries so you can buss power wherever you need it.
 
So many applications, so little time...
 
Jim Bounds
-


________________________________
From: Bob Heller <rheller@cfl.rr.com>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators




Matt,

My thinking is that since I start with fully charged batteries because the GMC is almost always plugged in I really don't need to hold the running voltage at 14.4 to make sure they are charged, that just leads to excessive gassing and battery heat, especially since I am always driving in Florida where it's usually warm and many times take trips of a few hours at a time in that warm weather. Ideally I would like to make the alt output be about 13.8 but I don't want to spend any appreciable amount of money to do this. A $10 voltage regulator I might consider but no more than that.

I can understand the 14.4 volts on a car where the alternator is the only method of charging the battery but since my GMC batteries are kept 'topped up' by the PD converter it's a different environment.

So, would I gain any battery life by not keeping them bubbling along at 14.4 volts?


--
Bob Heller
1974 X-Canyonlands 26ft
Winter Springs FL
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229691 is a reply to message #229656] Wed, 13 November 2013 11:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
JohnL455 wrote on Wed, 13 November 2013 08:56

Dead Hondas and dead boom boom stereos is a bad thing? NOW if they could make the computer sense the non OEM coffee can muffler on the 4 banger and shut it down, that would be great!


I like that idea.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators [message #229692 is a reply to message #229689] Wed, 13 November 2013 11:13 Go to previous message
Jeff Marten is currently offline  Jeff Marten   United States
Messages: 199
Registered: August 2013
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I'm planning on replacing the single 12v house battery with 2 6v golf cart batteries run in series. You get the extra capacity without having to switch between batteries. To start with I'm going to swipe a couple of the good 6v's from my electric car - it only has 16, and about 8 need to be replaced before I get it back on the road.

> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:05:51 -0800
> From: gmccoop@yahoo.com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators
>
> Bob,
>
> You are describing your real world driving situation-- I am with ya and is pretty much the same way I use my coach. In fact, mine stays here at the shop plugged in so much I could probably replace mine with motorcycle batteries! We really should run them down periodically them charge them back up but hey, thats in that perfect world none of us have.
>
> If one of these guys dry camp all the time, they will want different stuff than what you and I have. I usually recommend folks put 2 marine style deep cycle batteries on an A/B selector switch. That way they will be able to use one then the other one, charge them seperatly if needbe, have 2 shots at having power and when it's parked can seperate and turn the batteries off entirely. I also add a "combine" circuit between the engine and living area batteries so you can buss power wherever you need it.
>
> So many applications, so little time...
>
> Jim Bounds
> -
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bob Heller <rheller@cfl.rr.com>
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Now the rest of the story - about alternators
>
>
>
>
> Matt,
>
> My thinking is that since I start with fully charged batteries because the GMC is almost always plugged in I really don't need to hold the running voltage at 14.4 to make sure they are charged, that just leads to excessive gassing and battery heat, especially since I am always driving in Florida where it's usually warm and many times take trips of a few hours at a time in that warm weather. Ideally I would like to make the alt output be about 13.8 but I don't want to spend any appreciable amount of money to do this. A $10 voltage regulator I might consider but no more than that.
>
> I can understand the 14.4 volts on a car where the alternator is the only method of charging the battery but since my GMC batteries are kept 'topped up' by the PD converter it's a different environment.
>
> So, would I gain any battery life by not keeping them bubbling along at 14.4 volts?
>
>
> --
> Bob Heller
> 1974 X-Canyonlands 26ft
> Winter Springs FL
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



1985 Gulf Stream 34' Sun Stream 1964 Falcon 'Vert 1980 Bradley GTE 1999 Chevy Tahoe 2005 Saab 93 Aero 1987 Suzuki Intruder 1400 1978 Glastron/Carlson CV23
Previous Topic: JimB's Front End Diagnostics
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Off Topic. autocross
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 02 11:31:49 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.20751 seconds