GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Piston Ring End Gap (I know the specs are .010 - .023 but??)
Piston Ring End Gap [message #224924] Tue, 08 October 2013 23:21 Go to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Hello Engine builders:



The Quick Questions are:

(Mahle Cast Rings)
A What are you experienced Builders Using for an end gap when installing your rings?? any problems in the .010 to .015 Range

B With our engines running harder and sometimes hotter, are you running larger gaps?? Most Ring Companies seem to be indicating .0145 as being minimum for a 4.156 bore such as mine. (.030 over) (4.156 X 0.0035 = 0.0145)

My engine destroyed a crank. Mad I have a pocket full of theories as to why the engine failed, but none could be substantiated. Unfortunately not knowing the exact cause is frustrating.

I found a core crank,and had it ground .010 under on the mains and throws. I also had the rotating assembly balanced. Luckily the cylinders were not damaged and a light hone made them good as new. (I'm happy I did not have to replace my nice forged pistons Very Happy )

Now that I finally have all the parts on hand, I can start building the engine again. Currently, I’m measuring about .012 to .014 ring end gaps. While these measurements are fine according to service manual specifications, they may be a little tight according to general knowledge.

Best Regards

John Heslinga


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: Piston Ring End Gap [message #224994 is a reply to message #224924] Wed, 09 October 2013 13:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Cadillackeeper is currently offline  Cadillackeeper   United States
Messages: 464
Registered: October 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I would check with the Piston manufacturer.I have the KB hypers in my Cad and its a crazy huge file fit end gap they use,no matter the ring manufacturer.Forged is most likely tight.

77 455 Elaganza II and 67 Animal, Built 500 Powered Eldo
Re: [GMCnet] Piston Ring End Gap [message #225005 is a reply to message #224924] Wed, 09 October 2013 15:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
John, I use .004" per inch of bore. Example: 4 inch bore x .004 = .016".
You do not want the ends of the rings to expand to the point where they
touch. Bad stuff happens then. You can go a scosche tighter than that on
the second ring, but not much. Remember, if an appropriate amount of
lubricant does not reach the top ring, bad stuff will surely follow.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 Gmc Royale 403
On Oct 8, 2013 9:21 PM, "John Heslinga" <rbeeper@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hello Engine builders:
>
>
>
> The Quick Questions are:
>
> (Mahle Cast Rings)
> A What are you experienced Builders Using for an end gap when installing
> your rings?? any problems in the .010 to .015 Range
>
> B With our engines running harder and sometimes hotter, are you running
> larger gaps?? Most Ring Companies seem to be indicating .0145 as being
> minimum for a 4.156 bore such as mine. (.030 over) (4.156 X 0.0035 =
> 0.0145)
>
> My engine destroyed a crank. :x I have a pocket full of theories as to
> why the engine failed, but none could be substantiated. Unfortunately not
> knowing the exact cause is frustrating.
>
> I found a core crank,and had it ground .010 under on the mains and throws.
> I also had the rotating assembly balanced. Luckily the cylinders were
> not damaged and a light hone made them good as new. (I'm happy I did not
> have to replace my nice forged pistons :d )
>
> Now that I finally have all the parts on hand, I can start building the
> engine again. Currently, I’m measuring about .012 to .014 ring end gaps.
> While these measurements are fine according to service manual
> specifications, they may be a little tight according to general knowledge.
>
> Best Regards
>
> John Heslinga
> --
> John and Cathie Heslinga
> 1974 Canyonlands 260
> TC4W "Too Cool For Words"
> Retirement Projects Galore
> Edmonton, Alberta
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Piston Ring End Gap [message #225021 is a reply to message #225005] Wed, 09 October 2013 19:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Larry is currently offline  Larry   United States
Messages: 2875
Registered: January 2004
Location: Menomonie, WI
Karma: 10
Senior Member
James Hupy wrote on Wed, 09 October 2013 15:35

John, I use .004" per inch of bore. Example: 4 inch bore x .004 = .016".
You do not want the ends of the rings to expand to the point where they
touch. Bad stuff happens then. You can go a scosche tighter than that on
the second ring, but not much. Remember, if an appropriate amount of
lubricant does not reach the top ring, bad stuff will surely follow.
Jim Hupy



Yup, this is what I use. Here is a little primer that I put together about locating ring end gap when you place the pistons in the holes. I've followed this procedure since I learned of it while working at a speed shop. Seems to minimize blow-by and keep compression pretty consistant across the board. JWID

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g4104-putting-rings-on-pistons.html


Larry Smile
78 Royale w/500 Caddy
Menomonie, WI.
Re: Piston Ring End Gap [message #225025 is a reply to message #224924] Wed, 09 October 2013 20:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Cadillackeeper is currently offline  Cadillackeeper   United States
Messages: 464
Registered: October 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Nice!!!!!Looks like instructions,makes me want to rebuild another.It has been over 7
years.I did have tons of oil going by for a long,time before things finally set in.I was
unaware of the hyper piston failures,mostly from nitrous,racing stuff and heavy detonation.I guess pulling a giant Motorhome is similar.Forged pistons he going to run for years to come.


77 455 Elaganza II and 67 Animal, Built 500 Powered Eldo
Re: Piston Ring End Gap [message #225059 is a reply to message #224924] Thu, 10 October 2013 08:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Thanks everyone!! Cool

I think I'll follow the the tighter end of the ring manufactures recommendations rather than the maintenance Manual. (MM) Seems that 0.010 could cause problems.

They say go with 0.016 on tops and 0.020 on second ring. These are still in the range of the MM specs. However I've seen some recommendations that specify some very wide gaps. ( hmmmm)


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: Piston Ring End Gap [message #225064 is a reply to message #225059] Thu, 10 October 2013 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
roy1 is currently offline  roy1   United States
Messages: 2126
Registered: July 2004
Location: Minden nevada
Karma: 6
Senior Member
John Heslinga wrote on Thu, 10 October 2013 06:42

Thanks everyone!! Cool

I think I'll follow the the tighter end of the ring manufactures recommendations rather than the maintenance Manual. (MM) Seems that 0.010 could cause problems.

They say go with 0.016 on tops and 0.020 on second ring. These are still in the range of the MM specs. However I've seen some recommendations that specify some very wide gaps. ( hmmmm)


I used joe mondello's engine building article as a reference as I built my engines.it is helpful in my opinion.


Roy Keen Minden,NV 76 X Glenbrook
Re: Piston Ring End Gap [message #225093 is a reply to message #224924] Thu, 10 October 2013 16:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Not sure what article you are referring to or what it says. However:
In Joe Mondello's article in the Engine Builders Magazine, he states :

Quote:


I end gap my rings wider than most rebuilders. The top ring on a 4.125” to 4.155” net bore is .020” to .022” top .022” to .024” second oil ring rails .020” to .022”.


This sure indicates to me that it was a good thing I'm asking. The .010 spec sure could be a problem. I'm feeling a lot more comfortable now. Thanks

I don't know how i can cryogenically freeze my block though :>]

Best regards


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: [GMCnet] Piston Ring End Gap [message #225184 is a reply to message #224924] Fri, 11 October 2013 07:09 Go to previous message
Steven Ferguson is currently offline  Steven Ferguson   United States
Messages: 3447
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I hand fit each ring to the cylinder it is destined for. To measure, I use
the piston to push the ring down into the bore 1" and use a feeler gauge
for measuring. I have a manual ring gap grinder and when I get the ring to
what the mfr recommends, I carefully finish the ring gap edges with a
stone. I also follow the mfrs recommendation for ring placement on the
piston.
Steve F.


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:21 PM, John Heslinga <rbeeper@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hello Engine builders:
>
>
>
> The Quick Questions are:
>
> (Mahle Cast Rings)
> A What are you experienced Builders Using for an end gap when installing
> your rings?? any problems in the .010 to .015 Range
>
> B With our engines running harder and sometimes hotter, are you running
> larger gaps?? Most Ring Companies seem to be indicating .0145 as being
> minimum for a 4.156 bore such as mine. (.030 over) (4.156 X 0.0035 =
> 0.0145)
>
> My engine destroyed a crank. :x I have a pocket full of theories as to
> why the engine failed, but none could be substantiated. Unfortunately not
> knowing the exact cause is frustrating.
>
> I found a core crank,and had it ground .010 under on the mains and throws.
> I also had the rotating assembly balanced. Luckily the cylinders were
> not damaged and a light hone made them good as new. (I'm happy I did not
> have to replace my nice forged pistons :d )
>
> Now that I finally have all the parts on hand, I can start building the
> engine again. Currently, I’m measuring about .012 to .014 ring end gaps.
> While these measurements are fine according to service manual
> specifications, they may be a little tight according to general knowledge.
>
> Best Regards
>
> John Heslinga
> --
> John and Cathie Heslinga
> 1974 Canyonlands 260
> TC4W "Too Cool For Words"
> Retirement Projects Galore
> Edmonton, Alberta
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Take care,
Steve
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Previous Topic: Monitor Panel Upgrade
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] ~ Final Drive ~
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Aug 28 11:56:32 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02120 seconds