GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?
[GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213498] Sat, 06 July 2013 16:12 Go to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
Currently I'm consumed with images of the Boeing 777 wreckage at SFO. If it's true that only 2 people died in this tragedy then it's a testament to engineering, constant refinement, and crew training.

The construction of our coaches has been likened to that of aircraft. Perhaps that's why so many remain and may be a factor in our love of these old girls. Great engineering stopped at construction. It's up to us to constantly maintain and improve the rigs if we are to enjoy them for many years.

Still I need to learn from this. The recent engine fire shows that things happen. Jim B has an important safety upgrade that must now be first on my list. It could save my family. Next I need to adjust my driving style so that I can stop safely with whatever brakes I have.

Our best wishes to all those who are effected by this.

Larry Davick
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213516 is a reply to message #213498] Sat, 06 July 2013 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
Larry, cut a little hole in the floor so you can see a flame, should you have one. I have the auto fire extinguishers plus a little window. I feel more at ease.
Dan


3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213520 is a reply to message #213498] Sat, 06 July 2013 19:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Luvn737s is currently offline  Luvn737s   United States
Messages: 1106
Registered: June 2007
Karma: 2
Senior Member
The aft baggage compartment of one of the airliners I formerly flew had a little window (but in the GMC you would want it made out of oven glass and sealed well to keep out stray CO) and a port to stick a fire extinguisher in and flood the compartment. A similar design might be drawn up for the GMC. Again the port should be sealed to allow only one way access for an extinguisher and not allow stray CO to enter the cockpit.

Too early to tell on the SFO 777, but eerily similar to BA's 777 loss at Heathrow a few years back.


Randy
1973 26' Painted Desert
Ahwatukee (Phoenix) AZ

[Updated on: Sat, 06 July 2013 19:28]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213524 is a reply to message #213520] Sat, 06 July 2013 19:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mschultz is currently offline  mschultz   United States
Messages: 113
Registered: September 2010
Location: Maple City, MI
Karma: 0
Senior Member
As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine and hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael Schultz
77 403 Palm Beach
Maple City, MI
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213543 is a reply to message #213498] Sat, 06 July 2013 20:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Luvn737s is currently offline  Luvn737s   United States
Messages: 1106
Registered: June 2007
Karma: 2
Senior Member
To those who have the Fire Suppressant systems, do you think that the airflow through the engine compartment at cruise speed is enough to disperse the agent too much? Should the coach be stopped before trying to fight the fire?

Randy
1973 26' Painted Desert
Ahwatukee (Phoenix) AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213584 is a reply to message #213524] Sun, 07 July 2013 09:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine and hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213586 is a reply to message #213498] Sun, 07 July 2013 10:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Larry,

You are correct the GMC body is made like an aircraft, you have frames that run perpendicular to the fore aft axis, longerons that
run the full length, and stringers in between frames.

The skin is bonded to the frames, longerons, and stringers which is how aircraft are built now a days.

The best thing to do is to review the document we put together regarding steps you can do to PREVENT a fire which is on the GMCES
website.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Davick

Currently I'm consumed with images of the Boeing 777 wreckage at SFO. If it's true that only 2 people died in this tragedy then it's
a testament to engineering, constant refinement, and crew training.

The construction of our coaches has been likened to that of aircraft. Perhaps that's why so many remain and may be a factor in our
love of these old girls. Great engineering stopped at construction. It's up to us to constantly maintain and improve the rigs if we
are to enjoy them for many years.

Still I need to learn from this. The recent engine fire shows that things happen. Jim B has an important safety upgrade that must
now be first on my list. It could save my family. Next I need to adjust my driving style so that I can stop safely with whatever
brakes I have.

Our best wishes to all those who are effected by this.

Larry Davick


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213599 is a reply to message #213584] Sun, 07 July 2013 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!

Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine and hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213609 is a reply to message #213586] Sun, 07 July 2013 12:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bryant374 is currently offline  bryant374   United States
Messages: 563
Registered: May 2004
Location: Pleasant Valley, NY 12569
Karma: 1
Senior Member
>
>
You are correct the GMC body is made like an aircraft, you have frames that run perpendicular to the fore aft axis, longerons that run the full length, and stringers in between frames.

The skin is bonded to the frames, longerons, and stringers which is how aircraft are built now a days.
>
>
>






History (again, sorry)
The Engineer who had responsibility for the GMC body structure was John Locklin, his background was aeronautical engineering. He told me that during WWII he designed/built gliders and his background did influence his design ideas for the GMC body structure.


Bill Bryant
PO 1976~PB (owned 34 years)
1914 Ford (owned 70 years)
1965 Corvette (owned 39 years)
GMC Motorhome History
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213610 is a reply to message #213599] Sun, 07 July 2013 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
China Airlines put one in the drink off the end of Kai Tak Airport when I was based in Hong Kong. The tail stuck up out of the water
with a nice BIG CHINA AIRLINES logo and name on it. They asked the Hong Kong authorities to remove the tail. They did by blowing it
off with explosive charges. A buddy of mine was on the police force team that did it. The local news noted it was blown off because
it was a hazard to other aircraft, BULLSHIT!

IIRC that accident was pilot error also, I can't remember what he did wrong but during the investigation it came to light that the
co-pilot knew he was making a mistake but didn't question his actions because HE was a superior officer. Basically the co-pilot
didn't do his bloody job!!!!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 10:57 AM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?

Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!

Mac in OKC

http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213616 is a reply to message #213599] Sun, 07 July 2013 13:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at least require you to file the trip as ifr?
 
===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!
 
Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine and  hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213619 is a reply to message #213616] Sun, 07 July 2013 14:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Guy Lopes is currently offline  Guy Lopes   United States
Messages: 499
Registered: April 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Airlines file IFR as a rule, non-airline jets aren't required to fly IFR and
may fly VFR virtually anywhere below 18,000 ft. For airline ops it's rare
that a glideslope signal is actually required for a given runway or
approach, but most have it. Most runways served by airlines also have a VASI
or PAPI near the approach end of the runway. These are lights that provide a
visual indication as to where the aircraft is in relation to the 3 degree
(normal) glidepath. Though these lights aren't even required in most cases.
Most modern airliners have other means to indicate glidepath deviation as
well. Usually RNAV based (GPS, inertial, etc.). To back all of that up is
the ol' Mark 3 human eyeball and judgement.


Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA

www.GMC-Guy.com




-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Bridges
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 11:38 AM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?

Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at
least require you to file the trip as ifr?
 
===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!
 
Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be
chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine
and  hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in
the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still
temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a
recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and
crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Guy Lopes 76 Birchaven "Orion" Sacramento, CA W6TOL www.GMC-Guy.com
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213621 is a reply to message #213616] Sun, 07 July 2013 14:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
I'm sure the equipment was in the aircraft, but it not something that "controls" the landing. AFAIK, the pilot still lands the big bird manually.

Mac in OKC
USAF & FAA (retired)



Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 13:38, "Johnny Bridges" <jhbridges@ymail.com> wrote:

Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at least require you to file the trip as ifr?

===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!

Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine and hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213622 is a reply to message #213621] Sun, 07 July 2013 14:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Guy Lopes is currently offline  Guy Lopes   United States
Messages: 499
Registered: April 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
I'm almost certain (but have never flown the 777 so could be wrong) that the
777 has autoland capability. But you're right Mac, it appears in this case
it was a manual landing. At the very least, the autoland system would have
nailed the localizer and been dead center on the runway centerline. The tail
appears to have hit well right of center. Just my take on this.

We'll all find out soon enough exactly what caused this unfortunate
accident.

<Monday morning quarterback mode off>

Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA

www.GMC-Guy.com



-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:30 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?

I'm sure the equipment was in the aircraft, but it not something that
"controls" the landing. AFAIK, the pilot still lands the big bird manually.

Mac in OKC
USAF & FAA (retired)



Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 13:38, "Johnny Bridges" <jhbridges@ymail.com> wrote:

Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at
least require you to file the trip as ifr?

===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!

Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be
chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine
and hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in
the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still
temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a
recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and
crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Guy Lopes 76 Birchaven "Orion" Sacramento, CA W6TOL www.GMC-Guy.com
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213628 is a reply to message #213619] Sun, 07 July 2013 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
I'm aware.  Commenting on Big Brother is all.
 
--johnny

From: Guy Lopes <tawptool@surewest.net>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Airlines file IFR as a rule, non-airline jets aren't required to fly IFR and
may fly VFR virtually anywhere below 18,000 ft. For airline ops it's rare
that a glideslope signal is actually required for a given runway or
approach, but most have it. Most runways served by airlines also have a VASI
or PAPI near the approach end of the runway. These are lights that provide a
visual indication as to where the aircraft is in relation to the 3 degree
(normal) glidepath. Though these lights aren't even required in most cases.
Most modern airliners have other means to indicate glidepath deviation as
well. Usually RNAV based (GPS, inertial, etc.). To back all of that up is
the ol' Mark 3 human eyeball and judgement.


Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA

www.GMC-Guy.com




-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Bridges
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 11:38 AM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?

Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at
least require you to file the trip as ifr?
 
===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!
 
Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be
chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine
and  hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in
the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still
temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a
recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and
crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213629 is a reply to message #213622] Sun, 07 July 2013 17:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Well, the NTSB spokselady on the news says 7 seconds before it hit there's a voice calling for a speed increase, 4 seconds before it hit the stick shaker activated, and a second and a half before there was a call to go around.  So at this point, it sounds as if they are going to sell it to the pilot.  Given that it's very unlikely there would be an inexperienced driver in something that expensive, you have to wonder what distracted the flight crew.   It will out eventually, however.
 
--johnny
 

From: Guy Lopes <tawptool@surewest.net>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


I'm almost certain (but have never flown the 777 so could be wrong) that the
777 has autoland capability. But you're right Mac, it appears in this case
it was a manual landing. At the very least, the autoland system would have
nailed the localizer and been dead center on the runway centerline. The tail
appears to have hit well right of center. Just my take on this.

We'll all find out soon enough exactly what caused this unfortunate
accident.

<Monday morning quarterback mode off>

Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA

www.GMC-Guy.com



-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:30 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?

I'm sure the equipment was in the aircraft, but it not something that
"controls" the landing. AFAIK, the pilot still lands the big bird manually.

Mac in OKC
USAF & FAA (retired)



Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 13:38, "Johnny Bridges" <jhbridges@ymail.com> wrote:

Did not our friends in the FAA madnate their use for jet aircraft - or at
least require you to file the trip as ifr?

===johnny

From: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org" <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?


Pilot should NOT need glide slope signal to land in CAVU!
 
Mac in OKC

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:56, "Rob Mueller" <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:

Michael,

From what I've seen and heard on the news is that crash will probably be
chalked up as pilot error, he came in too damn low!

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Schultz

As I have stated before, on top of Jim B. fire suppression automatic engine
and  hand held 2 lb. all foam extinguishers, I have
carbon monoxide and smoke detectors. I installed a high temp thermometer in
the floor just forward and right of the drivers seat. I
always know from a glance what the running down the road and sitting still
temp is in the engine compartment. Also a great indicator
of when things are getting into the vapor lock temperature range. Mine is a
recycled boiler stat but thermostats that go on your
grill would also work.

From the pictures, the plane crash was indeed a testament to engineers and
crew and safety procedures. Of course our best to those
who lost loved ones and those injured.

Michael

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213636 is a reply to message #213584] Sun, 07 July 2013 18:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Getting those jet jockeys to look out of the front window has always been a problem. Their high reliance on instrumentation has conditioned them not to look outside. This was a visual final approach over water (poor depth / height perception) and they actually had to look outside and see what was going on. By the time they realized that they were to low and slow (the engines were at idle), the turbines did not have time to spool back up to make power. Seven seconds prior to impact is a little late to realize you are too slow/low. The stall warning went off 3 seconds later. 4 seconds after that they hit the ground.

I wonder if they ever looked outside during the final approach.

I hate to see when they all to often try to blame the pilots, but this time I think it is justified.

<Monday morning quarter back mode off>


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane? [message #213671 is a reply to message #213636] Mon, 08 July 2013 07:39 Go to previous message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Two things come to mind:
 
1. Thurmon Munson Syndrome    
2.  First time I flew in Lakefront Nwrlins.  Turn out over Ponchartrain on an overcast day, instant instruments... vote on which way is 'up'
 
--johnny
 


________________________________
From: Ken Burton <n9cv@comcast.net>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Built like an airplane?




Getting those jet jockeys to look out of the front window has always been a problem.  Their high reliance on instrumentation has conditioned them not to look outside.  This was a visual final approach over water (poor depth / height perception) and they actually had to look outside and see what was going on.  By the time they realized that they were to low and slow (the engines were at idle), the turbines did not have time to spool back up to make power.  Seven seconds prior to impact is a little late to realize you are too slow/low.  The stall warning went off 3 seconds later.  4 seconds after that they hit the ground.   

I wonder if they ever looked outside during the final approach.

I hate to see when they all to often try to blame the pilots, but this time I think it is justified.

<Monday morning quarter back mode off>
--
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Previous Topic: Seat belts
Next Topic: No joy Genny (Onan woes)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 26 16:46:06 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08751 seconds