Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168910 is a reply to message #168897] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 11:28 |
Ken Henderson
Messages: 8726 Registered: March 2004 Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yes, I'd definitely recommend a fiberglass shroud. It will route all of
the air passing through the radiator to the fan, which I consider an
advantage. If it's split horizontally, removing just a few bolts will
allow you to remove just the bottom half for access to the fan belts and
water pump when they inevitably need attention.
Ken H.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM, cameron wrote:
> Ken
> Thanks for the information
> So you would recomend replacing the stock shroud and getting a split one?
> Just want to make sure before I drop down another $200.00
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168912 is a reply to message #168897] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 11:34 |
|
mike miller
Messages: 3576 Registered: February 2004 Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
cameron wrote on Tue, 08 May 2012 07:57 | Ken
Thanks for the information
So you would recomend replacing the stock shroud and getting a split one?
Just want to make sure before I drop down another $200.00
Thanks
Cameron
|
Someone, sometime, posted some pictures of modifying the original "horse collar" type fan shroud into a split shroud. I THOUGHT it was KenH. But just looked and did not see it in his MANY albums. But depending on how much you value your "life minutes" it might be a good idea just to buy one that is ready to bolt in.
The main thing is to ensure the area around the fan is where the shroud is the tightest. The more space around the tips of the fan the less efficient the fan will be. The "venturi ringed" horse collar might have been overkill and could be why the later coaches did not have them.
Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo'
http://m000035.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168939 is a reply to message #168917] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 14:33 |
Jp Benson
Messages: 649 Registered: October 2011 Location: Fla
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ken,
That's a real piece of mechanical artistry. By chance I actually looked at that album a couple of days ago. What is the intent of all those flaps?
Paul
>________________________________
> From: Ken Henderson <hend4800@bellsouth.net>
>To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 12:51 PM
>Subject: Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal
>
>Not guilty. I just bought Frank Jenkins' fiberglass one many years ago and
>split it, using aluminum angles to rejoin the halves. My only shroud album
>is this one from last year:
>
>http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g5567-radiator-shroud-modification.html
>
>I've been using that uneventfully (unless it caused my Cad 500 thrust
>bearing failures) ever since without ever collecting the promised test
>data. Maybe some day...
>
>Ken H.
>
>
>
>On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> Someone, sometime, posted some pictures of modifying the original "horse
>> collar" type fan shroud into a split shroud. I THOUGHT it was KenH. But
>> just looked and did not see it in his MANY albums...
>_______________________________________________
>GMCnet mailing list
>Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168943 is a reply to message #168910] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 15:13 |
GMC_LES
Messages: 569 Registered: October 2009 Location: Montreal
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Just wondering how the fan blade clearance on the fiberglass shroud compares to the original horse collar unit?
Any chance of the fan rubbing if an engine mount was bad?
Les Burt
Montreal
On 2012-05-08, at 12:28 PM, Ken Henderson <hend4800@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Yes, I'd definitely recommend a fiberglass shroud. It will route all of
> the air passing through the radiator to the fan, which I consider an
> advantage. If it's split horizontally, removing just a few bolts will
> allow you to remove just the bottom half for access to the fan belts and
> water pump when they inevitably need attention.
>
> Ken H.
>
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM, cameron wrote:
>
>> Ken
>> Thanks for the information
>> So you would recomend replacing the stock shroud and getting a split one?
>> Just want to make sure before I drop down another $200.00
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Les Burt
Montreal
1975 Eleganza 26ft
A work in Progress
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168972 is a reply to message #168939] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 19:34 |
Ken Henderson
Messages: 8726 Registered: March 2004 Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Just like on many "modern" vehicles -- to eliminate the stagnation of air
ahead of the disengaged fan -- if there is any. Which the
not-yet-accomplished testing was to determine. One of these days I'll
position a video camera to see whether the flaps open.
Ken H.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Jp Benson wrote:
> Ken,
>
> That's a real piece of mechanical artistry. By chance I actually looked
> at that album a couple of days ago. What is the intent of all those flaps?
>
> Paul
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #168973 is a reply to message #168943] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 19:39 |
Ken Henderson
Messages: 8726 Registered: March 2004 Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Les,
When I first installed the Cad 500, the fan would touch the shroud during
hard acceleration. I had to reposition the shroud slightly to provide
slightly more space on one side. I don't remember how much clearance that
was. I can check when I re-install the engine. I never had that problem
with the 455, which used the SAME motor mount.
Ken H.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Les Burt wrote:
> Just wondering how the fan blade clearance on the fiberglass shroud
> compares to the original horse collar unit?
>
> Any chance of the fan rubbing if an engine mount was bad?
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #169182 is a reply to message #168912] |
Thu, 10 May 2012 19:15 |
midlf
Messages: 2212 Registered: July 2007 Location: SE Wisc. (Palmyra)
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Mike Miller wrote on Tue, 08 May 2012 11:34 | Someone, sometime, posted some pictures of modifying the original "horse collar" type fan shroud into a split shroud. I THOUGHT it was KenH. But just looked and did not see it in his MANY albums. But depending on how much you value your "life minutes" it might be a good idea just to buy one that is ready to bolt in.
|
This one?
http://www.gmcws.org/Tech/fan_shroud/fanshroud.htm
Steve Southworth
1974 Glacier TZE064V100150 (for workin on)
1975 Transmode TZE365V100394 (parts & spares)
Palmyra WI
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #169195 is a reply to message #169182] |
Thu, 10 May 2012 19:48 |
|
mike miller
Messages: 3576 Registered: February 2004 Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
midlf wrote on Thu, 10 May 2012 17:15 |
Mike Miller wrote on Tue, 08 May 2012 11:34 | Someone, sometime, posted some pictures of modifying the original "horse collar" type fan shroud into a split shroud. I THOUGHT it was KenH. ...
|
This one?
http://www.gmcws.org/Tech/fan_shroud/fanshroud.htm
|
Yes!
That is the one.
The only thing I would add would be a bit of foam around the inside of the new "venturi ring." The tips of the fan would self-trim the foam for a close fit and effective air flow.
Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo'
http://m000035.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] motor and transmission removal [message #169269 is a reply to message #169195] |
Fri, 11 May 2012 15:38 |
Ken Burton
Messages: 10030 Registered: January 2004 Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Mike Miller wrote on Thu, 10 May 2012 19:48 |
midlf wrote on Thu, 10 May 2012 17:15 |
Mike Miller wrote on Tue, 08 May 2012 11:34 | Someone, sometime, posted some pictures of modifying the original "horse collar" type fan shroud into a split shroud. I THOUGHT it was KenH. ...
|
This one?
http://www.gmcws.org/Tech/fan_shroud/fanshroud.htm
|
Yes!
That is the one.
The only thing I would add would be a bit of foam around the inside of the new "venturi ring." The tips of the fan would self-trim the foam for a close fit and effective air flow.
|
I did exactly that several years ago. I used 1" or 1.25" foam rubber and glued it inside.
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
|
|
|