GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil
[GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil [message #167018] Fri, 20 April 2012 19:32 Go to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
If you didn't get this, it's an interesting read:

http://www.blackstone-labs.com/Newsletters/Gas-Diesel/April-1-2012.php?utm_source=Gas%2FDiesel+List&utm_campaign=b284759b87-&utm_medium=email

or

http://goo.gl/ciOCn

Ken H.
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil [message #167029 is a reply to message #167018] Fri, 20 April 2012 21:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
noi is currently offline  noi   United States
Messages: 293
Registered: October 2010
Location: South of Fremont
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Ken,

Nice read, thanks for posting - I look forward to parts 2+3 and what conclusions come from all the testing!

Carl P.
76 Birchaven
South of Fremont
Re: [GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil [message #167064 is a reply to message #167029] Sat, 21 April 2012 08:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jknezek is currently offline  jknezek   United States
Messages: 1057
Registered: December 2007
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Looking at the lower levels of zinc in many of these oils, at a time when flat tappet engines were common, does anyone else scratch their head and think maybe zinc isn't the culprit in our current problems?

I do see high zinc oils as well, but... a lot of these that were tested were in the 700 range, not the 1200-1400 we've been clamoring about.

I don't want to restart a war, but it's something to think about. I'm leaning more and more toward crappy parts causing the problems in newly rebuilt engines...


Thanks,
Jeremy Knezek
1976 Glenbrook
Birmingham, AL
Re: [GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil [message #167079 is a reply to message #167064] Sat, 21 April 2012 10:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
jknezek wrote on Sat, 21 April 2012 07:36

Looking at the lower levels of zinc in many of these oils, at a time when flat tappet engines were common, does anyone else scratch their head and think maybe zinc isn't the culprit in our current problems?

I do see high zinc oils as well, but... a lot of these that were tested were in the 700 range, not the 1200-1400 we've been clamoring about.

I don't want to restart a war, but it's something to think about. I'm leaning more and more toward crappy parts causing the problems in newly rebuilt engines...


What current problems??


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Analyzing OLD Oil [message #167229 is a reply to message #167079] Sun, 22 April 2012 21:00 Go to previous message
Dwayne is currently offline  Dwayne   United States
Messages: 418
Registered: October 2007
Location: White Rock BC
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I just came for a Classic & Custom Car Show ( they had George Barris, Gene
WInfireld, Chip Foose adn Don Carlits as guests) Great show. There was a
booth for Collector Automobile Motor Oil www.camoils.com they claim
1600 parts per million, of ZDDP, per liter. Has the correct detergents and
dispersants to prevent deposit formation and sludge formation from
contaminates. Has Primary ZDDP, and Secondary ZDDP and more. They claim
the Mobile 1 synthetic is not good for our engines.
Regards
Dwayne Jacobson
White Rock, BC
77 Kingsley
Plan to attend the Cascaders White Rally August 2 to 6th and join several
of us as we head off Across Canada (return through the States)
for more info email my dwayne.jacobson@gmail.com



On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Bob de Kruyff <NEXT2POOL@aol.com> wrote:

>
>
> jknezek wrote on Sat, 21 April 2012 07:36
> > Looking at the lower levels of zinc in many of these oils, at a time
> when flat tappet engines were common, does anyone else scratch their head
> and think maybe zinc isn't the culprit in our current problems?
> >
> > I do see high zinc oils as well, but... a lot of these that were tested
> were in the 700 range, not the 1200-1400 we've been clamoring about.
> >
> > I don't want to restart a war, but it's something to think about. I'm
> leaning more and more toward crappy parts causing the problems in newly
> rebuilt engines...
>
>
> What current problems??
> --
> Bob de Kruyff
> 78 Eleganza
> Chandler, AZ
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Dwayne Jacobson
Haven Properties
Ph: 604-538-3823 Ext 22
Fax: 604-538-5845
Cell: 604-644-8090
dwayne@havenproperties.ca
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Dwayne & Sharon Jacobson
White Rock, BC
77 Eleganza II
Previous Topic: OUCH! That was hot
Next Topic: [GMCnet] torsion bar tool
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Sep 28 18:17:23 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00993 seconds