| Re: [GMCnet] The Markbag(tm) [message #151019] |
Tue, 29 November 2011 19:41  |
sgltrac
Messages: 2797
Registered: April 2011
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I agree with you Ron but if the new bag is twice the diameter of the oe it will require less pressure to reach a similar level of support. Hopefully get a seat of the pants test this weekend. Mark has over 1000 miles on his
Sully
77 royale
------Original Message------
From: Bob de Kruyff
Sender: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
ReplyTo: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] The Markbag(tm)
Sent: Nov 29, 2011 5:25 PM
""Please continue to offer to produce these things. Having made and installed one already you are way ahead of us. ""
I love the idea of choices and this looks like a good one. I would encourage someone to do a good evaluation before too many are built. The fact that the various systems require diiferent air pressures to reach a certain ride height means that the ride and roll rates may be different. My feeling is that the current rear roll rate of the stock GMC is too low and I would hesitate to make it lower yet.
--
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Sully
77 Royale basket case.
Future motorhome land speed record holder(bucket list)
Seattle, Wa.
|
|
|
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
