GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Fuel Hose
[GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141823] Wed, 31 August 2011 09:30 Go to next message
bdub is currently offline  bdub   United States
Messages: 1578
Registered: February 2004
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 5
Senior Member

I'm getting ready to go back up with my tanks. Local NAPA sells
Weatherhead brand hose, an Eaton product. It has a NITRILE inner
liner and seems to be alcohol compatible. Would some of you check
this out and let me know if you think it would be a good product to
use for vents and delivery?

Their H057 looks good for vents and suction lines:
http://hydraulics.eaton.com/products/pdfs/W-HYOV-MC002-E3_Section_E.pdf.
H077 or H059 for pressure.

http://tinyurl.com/3zc9xbu - Page 12
<http://pirate4x4.com/tech/billavista/PR-Hydro_Steering/Dana%20BOSTON%20WEATHERHEAD%20%AE%20HOSE%20ASSEMBLY%20Master%20Catalog.pdf>
- Page 12


I've installed the 3/4" pads between the body and frame so am planning
to glue spacer pads to the top of the fuel tanks also. This would
allow plenty of room for the vent and suction lines on top of the
tanks. Does this sound logical to ya'll?

I'd kinda like to install the electric fuel pumps in the tanks, but
don't think I've heard of a low pressure in-tank pump as of yet. I'm
still using carburetion. Still have time to make up my mind before
reinstalling the tanks.

Thanks
bdub
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



bdub
'76 Palm Beach/Central Texas
www.bdub.net
www.gmcmhphotos.com
www.gmcmotorhomemarketplace.com
www.gmcmhregistry.com
www.facebook.com/groups/classicgmcmotorhomes
www.facebook.com/groups/gmcmm
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141828 is a reply to message #141823] Wed, 31 August 2011 10:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Bdub,

I note the H057 is rated as SAE30R7 and the HO77 is rated as SAE30R9 which are both OK for use with Ethanol. Since you run a carb
the SAE30R7 is fine with a pressure rating of 50 psi for the supply as well.

Having said that, Jim B posted some pictures of SAE30R7 on the Daily Pose that appeared to be in pretty rough shape externally. You
could read the SAE30R7 white printing on the hose easily which led me to believe it hadn't been in service long.

John Sharpe replaced the fuel line in his Spectrum with metal and personally that's the way I'd go!

You don't have to glue spacers to the tops of the tanks, just duct tape the lines to the top of the tank in the recesses.

However, this is an interesting idea! You might create a flow path for air to circulate above as well as below the tank. It might be
a good thing - airflow across the top of the tank might cool the tank. It might be a bad thing - airflow would heat the fuel. Might
not matter either way and the fuel doesn't come into constant contact with the top of the fuel tank.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Billy Massey
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2011 12:31 AM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose

I'm getting ready to go back up with my tanks. Local NAPA sells
Weatherhead brand hose, an Eaton product. It has a NITRILE inner
liner and seems to be alcohol compatible. Would some of you check
this out and let me know if you think it would be a good product to
use for vents and delivery?

Their H057 looks good for vents and suction lines:
http://hydraulics.eaton.com/products/pdfs/W-HYOV-MC002-E3_Section_E.pdf.
H077 or H059 for pressure.

http://tinyurl.com/3zc9xbu - Page 12
<http://pirate4x4.com/tech/billavista/PR-Hydro_Steering/Dana%20BOSTON%20WEATHERHEAD%20%AE%20HOSE%20ASSEMBLY%20Master%20Catalog.pdf>
- Page 12


I've installed the 3/4" pads between the body and frame so am planning
to glue spacer pads to the top of the fuel tanks also. This would
allow plenty of room for the vent and suction lines on top of the
tanks. Does this sound logical to ya'll?

I'd kinda like to install the electric fuel pumps in the tanks, but
don't think I've heard of a low pressure in-tank pump as of yet. I'm
still using carburetion. Still have time to make up my mind before
reinstalling the tanks.

Thanks
bdub
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141845 is a reply to message #141823] Wed, 31 August 2011 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Wagner is currently offline  Jim Wagner   United States
Messages: 339
Registered: February 2004
Location: Brook Park, Oh
Karma: 0
Senior Member
BDUB,
Here is another option. I ran the steel lines down the side of the tank.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=37571&title=gmc-gas-tank-access-00&cat=5702

JWID
Jim Wagner
Brook Park, oh
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141846 is a reply to message #141845] Wed, 31 August 2011 12:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
Jim Wagner wrote on Wed, 31 August 2011 11:51

BDUB,
Here is another option. I ran the steel lines down the side of the tank.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=37571&title=gmc-gas-tank-access-00&cat=5702

JWID
Jim Wagner
Brook Park, oh


Jim, my plan also. I have the electric fuel pumps for my tanks. So, sometime when Sandy is away from the coach, lets you and me take a looksee at those holes in your floor.
Dan


3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141871 is a reply to message #141823] Wed, 31 August 2011 15:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Use the high pressure pumps with a bypass regulator at the carb. It will maintain what ever pressure you set it to and retrurn a constant flow back to the tank of the rest. Will help greatly with vapor lock and if you really want to keep the fuel cool run it through an oil cooler with an outside air duct to cool the fuel before you return it to the tank. makes for a bit more complicated plumbing though...

Mark


>I'd kinda like to install the electric fuel pumps in the tanks, but
don't think I've heard of a low pressure in-tank pump as of yet. I'm
still using carburetion. Still have time to make up my mind before
reinstalling the tanks.

Thanks
bdub
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

[/quote]


Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141888 is a reply to message #141845] Wed, 31 August 2011 17:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Jim,

Your response got me to thinkin'. I wonder if it would help with vapor lock problems if you ran the gas through a finned tube along
the outside of the frame.

http://www.fintube.com/

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Wagner

BDUB,
Here is another option. I ran the steel lines down the side of the tank.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=37571&title=gmc-gas-tank-access-00&cat=5702

JWID
Jim


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141901 is a reply to message #141888] Wed, 31 August 2011 19:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member

There is a "hotrod" outfit in Oklahoma named"Snug Harbor Customs" (IIRC) that sells finnedcoolers for remote mounting on custom carsthat might have application here!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ex-Palm Beach, 76 ~ ~ ~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

> From: robmueller@iinet.net.au
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 08:57:15 +1000
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose
>
> Jim,
>
> Your response got me to thinkin'. I wonder if it would help with vapor lock problems if you ran the gas through a finned tube along
> the outside of the frame.
>
> http://www.fintube.com/
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Wagner
>
> BDUB,
> Here is another option. I ran the steel lines down the side of the tank.
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=37571&title=gmc-gas-tank-access-00&cat=5702
>
> JWID
> Jim

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141904 is a reply to message #141823] Wed, 31 August 2011 19:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Wagner is currently offline  Jim Wagner   United States
Messages: 339
Registered: February 2004
Location: Brook Park, Oh
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Rob,
If the gas lines are getting hot from the heat of the road would the fins pull up more heat or would they cool. I don't know. Below is a photo of a shield I have on our GMC that is painted with a reflective paint. This runs beside the frame in an attempt to block the heat from the road from getting to the fuel lines.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=22344&title=first-coat-on-gas-line-shield&cat=4829
JWID
Jim Wagner
Brook Park, oh
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141927 is a reply to message #141904] Wed, 31 August 2011 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Jim,

I may be nuts / stupid / confused but I was thinking that there would be two sources of heat input into the tanks.

1. Convection heat from the air surrounding the tanks.

2) Radiated heat from the road surface itself.

Continuing that line of nutty / stupid / confused thinking I thought that if the radiated heat input from the road surface was
greater than the "convected" heat input from the surrounding air using finned tubes located on the outside of the frame up close to
the body could reduce the fuel temperature as it traveled up to the engine.

Somebody is probably going to point out a major flaw in my thinking and its going to be a DOUH moment for me! :-0

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Wagner

Rob,
If the gas lines are getting hot from the heat of the road would the fins pull up more heat or would they cool. I don't know. Below
is a photo of a shield I have on our GMC that is painted with a reflective paint. This runs beside the frame in an attempt to block
the heat from the road from getting to the fuel lines.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=22344&title=first-coat-on-gas-line-shield&cat=4829
JWID
Jim


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141942 is a reply to message #141828] Thu, 01 September 2011 05:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Billy Massey is currently offline  Billy Massey   United States
Messages: 916
Registered: January 2004
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 1
Senior Member

I imagine I'll go with steel lines also. That way a hole in the floor would
take care of anything that might go wrong in the future other than a hole in
the tank.

bdub


-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Rob Mueller

I note the H057 is rated as SAE30R7 and the HO77 is rated as SAE30R9 which
are both OK for use with Ethanol. Since you run a carb
the SAE30R7 is fine with a pressure rating of 50 psi for the supply as well.

Having said that, Jim B posted some pictures of SAE30R7 on the Daily Pose
that appeared to be in pretty rough shape externally. You
could read the SAE30R7 white printing on the hose easily which led me to
believe it hadn't been in service long.

John Sharpe replaced the fuel line in his Spectrum with metal and personally
that's the way I'd go!

You don't have to glue spacers to the tops of the tanks, just duct tape the
lines to the top of the tank in the recesses.

However, this is an interesting idea! You might create a flow path for air
to circulate above as well as below the tank. It might be
a good thing - airflow across the top of the tank might cool the tank. It
might be a bad thing - airflow would heat the fuel. Might
not matter either way and the fuel doesn't come into constant contact with
the top of the fuel tank.


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



bdub
bdub.net
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141949 is a reply to message #141942] Thu, 01 September 2011 07:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mike miller   United States
Messages: 3576
Registered: February 2004
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Billy Massey wrote on Thu, 01 September 2011 03:44

I imagine I'll go with steel lines also. That way a hole in the floor would take care of anything that might go wrong in the future other than a hole in
the tank.


At the price of good fuel hose, you'll get off cheaper with steel line. (As long as you are not paying labor.) Just need one bit of some type of flex line between the frame and the motor.


Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo' http://m000035.blogspot.com
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141961 is a reply to message #141942] Thu, 01 September 2011 08:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Emery published a fine description of going to hard lines in his
article, (currently held hostage by GMCMI), on in-tank-fuel pumps.

using brass connectors, reduces rubber flex lines to short ,
accessible , points.

and
here is another version by ChuckG using rubber connections:
http://www.gmcpc.org/archive/3rd_fuel_tank.pdf

gene



> I imagine I'll go with steel lines also.  That way a hole in the floor would
> take care of anything that might go wrong in the future other than a hole in
> the tank.
>
> bdub
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Rob Mueller
>
> I note the H057 is rated as SAE30R7 and the HO77 is rated as SAE30R9 which
> are both OK for use with Ethanol. Since you run a carb
> the SAE30R7 is fine with a pressure rating of 50 psi for the supply as well.
>
> Having said that, Jim B posted some pictures of SAE30R7 on the Daily Pose
> that appeared to be in pretty rough shape externally. You
> could read the SAE30R7 white printing on the hose easily which led me to
> believe it hadn't been in service long.
>
> John Sharpe replaced the fuel line in his Spectrum with metal and personally
> that's the way I'd go!
>
> You don't have to glue spacers to the tops of the tanks, just duct tape the
> lines to the top of the tank in the recesses.
>
> However, this is an interesting idea! You might create a flow path for air
> to circulate above as well as below the tank. It might be
> a good thing - airflow across the top of the tank might cool the tank. It
> might be a bad thing - airflow would heat the fuel. Might
> not matter either way and the fuel doesn't come into constant contact with
> the top of the fuel tank.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and -------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141978 is a reply to message #141961] Thu, 01 September 2011 10:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
G'day,

Discounting the costs involved I reckon the best tubing to use would be stainless steel with stainless steel fittings and braided
stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines. That's what is used in aircraft.

The next best would be copper with brass fittings and braided stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines.

Then aluminum with aluminum fittings, however, I can't remember if aircraft braided hoses came with aluminum fittings.

The last would be steel lines with steel fittings.

Having said all this what combination of tube and fittings would be the worst from a dissimilar metal corrosion point of view?

Regards,
Rob M.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141986 is a reply to message #141978] Thu, 01 September 2011 11:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member
Rob

I have to cordially disagree with you on this.

Stainless steel is probably the best for corrosion but it is really a problem? I think that about all automotobile manufacturers use plain steel.
Stainless is much harder to flare if you should want a flare fitting.
Copper is more susceptible to cracking if there is any vibration.
Aluminum would be more prone to corrosion and being soft it can easily be damages by impact or frequent tightening or loosening of the fittings.

You say steel would be last but I just don't see that. I have had steel lines on for my fuel for several years not and I have no rusting or other problems.

If you are worried about corrosion from dissimilar metals then steel would be the best since your frame is steel.

Emery Stora

On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Rob Mueller wrote:

> G'day,
>
> Discounting the costs involved I reckon the best tubing to use would be stainless steel with stainless steel fittings and braided
> stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines. That's what is used in aircraft.
>
> The next best would be copper with brass fittings and braided stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines.
>
> Then aluminum with aluminum fittings, however, I can't remember if aircraft braided hoses came with aluminum fittings.
>
> The last would be steel lines with steel fittings.
>
> Having said all this what combination of tube and fittings would be the worst from a dissimilar metal corrosion point of view?
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141993 is a reply to message #141986] Thu, 01 September 2011 11:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gary Worobec is currently offline  Gary Worobec   United States
Messages: 867
Registered: May 2005
Karma: -1
Senior Member
I gotta concur with Emery on this. If corrosion is really a problem a
liberal painting with POR15 slopped all over the connections and steel tube
on the top of the tanks would probably outlive all of us. With that said,
considering the relatively low cost of generic -6 Stainless steel braided
fuel hose from Summit Racing and the fact that you really do use fewer
fittings with hose and its easier to install I would give that a serious
look as well. My only concern with hard line is doing decent inverted flares
without cracking the tube and then all the fittings and connections. With SS
hose its "one and done".

Thanks

Gary and Joanne Worobec
1973 GMC Glacier
Anza, CA


----- Original Message -----
From: "Emery Stora" <emerystora@mac.com>
To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose


> Rob
>
> I have to cordially disagree with you on this.
>
> Stainless steel is probably the best for corrosion but it is really a
> problem? I think that about all automotobile manufacturers use plain
> steel.
> Stainless is much harder to flare if you should want a flare fitting.
> Copper is more susceptible to cracking if there is any vibration.
> Aluminum would be more prone to corrosion and being soft it can easily be
> damages by impact or frequent tightening or loosening of the fittings.
>
> You say steel would be last but I just don't see that. I have had steel
> lines on for my fuel for several years not and I have no rusting or other
> problems.
>
> If you are worried about corrosion from dissimilar metals then steel would
> be the best since your frame is steel.
>
> Emery Stora
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Rob Mueller wrote:
>
>> G'day,
>>
>> Discounting the costs involved I reckon the best tubing to use would be
>> stainless steel with stainless steel fittings and braided
>> stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines. That's what is used in aircraft.
>>
>> The next best would be copper with brass fittings and braided stainless
>> steel Teflon lined flex lines.
>>
>> Then aluminum with aluminum fittings, however, I can't remember if
>> aircraft braided hoses came with aluminum fittings.
>>
>> The last would be steel lines with steel fittings.
>>
>> Having said all this what combination of tube and fittings would be the
>> worst from a dissimilar metal corrosion point of view?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rob M.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
> Emery Stora
> 77 Kingsley
> Santa Fe, NM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141995 is a reply to message #141993] Thu, 01 September 2011 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Carl S. is currently offline  Carl S.   United States
Messages: 4186
Registered: January 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
Senior Member

The local premium auto parts store I deal with, Merle's (Parts +), carries a coated steel line that I have used for fuel, transmission, and brake line. It will not rust on the outside, anyway. The outside does get scraped up at the ends if you need to flare it, but that could be painted. I used this line on the tops of my tanks when I re-did the fuel hoses:

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=34775

I also used it for the brake line from the Line master cylinder to the line lock, when I recently did the disc brakes:

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=40217

I made a phone call and found out the source of it:

http://www.agscompany.com/faq/10


Carl Stouffer '75 ex Palm Beach Tucson, AZ. Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #141998 is a reply to message #141823] Thu, 01 September 2011 13:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gary Casey is currently offline  Gary Casey   United States
Messages: 448
Registered: September 2009
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I'll agree with Emery on this one.  Stainless is more difficult to work with and can't be double flared as it isn't as malleable.  Therefore, you have to (or should) use 37-degree aircraft (single) flares and fittings.  I would use stainless steel fittings instead of aluminum and these are very expensive.  And the plated steel lines that you buy are very good for corrosion resistance - I don't see anything wrong with using them.  I would never use copper in a vehicle as the vibration can lead to work hardening, which can lead to fatigue-induced cracks (so what did GM use for propane?  Hmmm..).  You could use aluminum, but I think it has no advantage except weight savings and you certainly don't need that.

For flexible lines, yes the teflon hoses with stainless steel abrasion covers certainly look nice and last just about forever.  In aircraft rubber hoses are life-limited to 5 years (recommended or required?  I'm not sure) and teflon hoses have an unlimited rated life.  But the normal aircraft hoses have 37-degree fittings, so you have to get race-car hoses with automotive flare fittings.  For low pressure service you can use hose clamps on rubber hoses.  Just do the first half of a double flare on the steel tube first.  And I would use the rubber hose for only what is required (above the fuel tank and between the frame and engine).
Gary Casey

Rob

I have to cordially disagree with you on this.

Stainless steel is probably the best for corrosion but it is really a problem?  I think that about all automotobile manufacturers use plain steel.
Stainless is much harder to flare if you should want a flare fitting.
Copper is more susceptible to cracking if there is any vibration.
Aluminum would be more prone to corrosion  and being soft it can easily be damages by impact or frequent tightening or loosening of the fittings.

You say steel would be last but I just don't see that.  I have had steel lines on for my fuel for several years not and I have no rusting or other problems.

If you are worried about corrosion from dissimilar metals then steel would be the best since your frame is steel.

Emery Stora

On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Rob Mueller wrote:

> G'day,

> Discounting the costs involved I reckon the best tubing to use would be stainless steel with stainless steel fittings and braided
> stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines. That's what is used in aircraft.

> The next best would be copper with brass fittings and braided stainless steel Teflon lined flex lines.

> Then aluminum with aluminum fittings, however, I can't remember if aircraft braided hoses came with aluminum fittings.

> The last would be steel lines with steel fittings.

> Having said all this what combination of tube and fittings would be the worst from a dissimilar metal corrosion point of view?

> Regards,
> Rob M.
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #142002 is a reply to message #141995] Thu, 01 September 2011 15:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gmcrv1 is currently offline  gmcrv1   United States
Messages: 839
Registered: August 2007
Location: Memphis
Karma: -1
Senior Member
Carl,

I replaced the fuel line from the master cylinder to my rear brakes on my
1969 Mercedes. I bought the line from Mercedes as I thought it would be a
preformed piece. It was not. But, it is exactly what the link shows from
your email. Easy to work and looks like it will last a long time. "Nice
Stuff".

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Carl Stouffer <carljr3b@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> The local premium auto parts store I deal with, Merle's (Parts +), carries
> a coated steel line that I have used for fuel, transmission, and brake line.
> It will not rust on the outside, anyway. The outside does get scraped up
> at the ends if you need to flare it, but that could be painted. I used this
> line on the tops of my tanks when I re-did the fuel hoses:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=34775
>
> I also used it for the brake line from the Line master cylinder to the line
> lock, when I recently did the disc brakes:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=40217
>
> I made a phone call and found out the source of it:
>
> http://www.agscompany.com/faq/10
> --
> Carl S.
> '75 ex Palm Beach
> Tucson, AZ.
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #142030 is a reply to message #141995] Thu, 01 September 2011 20:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member
Yes, that is exactly what I used on my fuel lines, over the tank and along the frame rail.
I also used it for the 3/8" transmission cooler lines.

Emery Stora

On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Carl Stouffer wrote:

>
>
> The local premium auto parts store I deal with, Merle's (Parts +), carries a coated steel line that I have used for fuel, transmission, and brake line. It will not rust on the outside, anyway. The outside does get scraped up at the ends if you need to flare it, but that could be painted. I used this line on the tops of my tanks when I re-did the fuel hoses:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=34775
>
> I also used it for the brake line from the Line master cylinder to the line lock, when I recently did the disc brakes:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=40217
>
> I made a phone call and found out the source of it:
>
> http://www.agscompany.com/faq/10
> --
> Carl S.
> '75 ex Palm Beach
> Tucson, AZ.
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Hose [message #142034 is a reply to message #141823] Thu, 01 September 2011 20:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jim Wagner is currently offline  Jim Wagner   United States
Messages: 339
Registered: February 2004
Location: Brook Park, Oh
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Carl,
If my tanks looked that good I would install a glass floor. What do you think Dan.

The local premium auto parts store I deal with, Merle's (Parts +), carries a coated steel line that I have used for fuel, transmission, and brake line. It will not rust on the outside, anyway. The outside does get scraped up at the ends if you need to flare it, but that could be painted. I used this line on the tops of my tanks when I re-did the fuel hoses:

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=34775

Jim Wagner
Brook Park, oh

Previous Topic: Fuel hose
Next Topic: Proposed California Emissions Bill pre 1981
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 17 06:30:37 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01720 seconds