GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » DIY alignment, another version
DIY alignment, another version [message #137983] Mon, 08 August 2011 07:14 Go to next message
Surbo is currently offline  Surbo   United States
Messages: 213
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Just another version of a turnplate for the DIY alignment guys.

http://www.arkansaspontiacs.org/techstories/turnplates/turnplates.html

Bob Drewes in SESD
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #137987 is a reply to message #137983] Mon, 08 August 2011 07:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I am still trying to follow this:

so if you do not want to calculate the caster ( just set to max)

you do not need a rotation plate - is that correct?

just park on a level surface
center the steering
set the height (by the book)
set the tow in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)
set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
set the caster at = max (set the offset bushings)

drive the GMC 10 miles
and do it again.

This is "necessary and sufficient" for the GMC?

gene



>
> Just another version of a turnplate for the DIY alignment guys.
>
> http://www.arkansaspontiacs.org/techstories/turnplates/turnplates.html
>
> Bob Drewes in SESD
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #137989 is a reply to message #137987] Mon, 08 August 2011 07:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
C Boyd is currently offline  C Boyd   United States
Messages: 2629
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 18
Senior Member
[quote title=Mr ERFisher wrote on Mon, 08 August 2011 08:40] I am still trying to follow this:

so if you do not want to calculate the caster ( just set to max)

you do not need a rotation plate - is that correct?

just park on a level surface
center the steering
set the height (by the book)
set the tow in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)
set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
set the caster at = max (set the offset bushings)

drive the GMC 10 miles
and do it again.

This is "necessary and sufficient" for the GMC?

gene





Mr. ERF: it is my understanding that Caster is set first at max, then camber is set at 0, then toe is set last to 0 in that order. The reason for using plates to set caster is to get R & L the same. For an unknown reason it seems that the drivers side will end up with more caster at max setting than the pass.


C. Boyd
76 Crestmont
East Tennessee
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #137991 is a reply to message #137987] Mon, 08 August 2011 07:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Pretty much, except that your sequence is wrong. Should be:

just park on a level surface
center the steering
set the height (by the book)
set the caster at = max (with or without offset bushings)
set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
set the toe in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)

drive the GMC 10 miles
and do it again.

If it drives good, that's "necessary & sufficient". Watch tread wear to be
sure.

Ken H.


On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, gene Fisher <mr.erfisher@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am still trying to follow this:
>
> so if you do not want to calculate the caster ( just set to max)
>
> you do not need a rotation plate - is that correct?
>
> just park on a level surface
> center the steering
> set the height (by the book)
> set the tow in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)
> set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
> set the caster at = max (set the offset bushings)
>
> drive the GMC 10 miles
> and do it again.
>
> This is "necessary and sufficient" for the GMC?
>
> gene
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #137992 is a reply to message #137987] Mon, 08 August 2011 08:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Surbo is currently offline  Surbo   United States
Messages: 213
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Mr ERFisher wrote on Mon, 08 August 2011 07:40

I am still trying to follow this:

so if you do not want to calculate the caster ( just set to max)

you do not need a rotation plate - is that correct?

just park on a level surface
center the steering
set the height (by the book)
set the tow in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)
set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
set the caster at = max (set the offset bushings)

drive the GMC 10 miles
and do it again.

This is "necessary and sufficient" for the GMC?

gene

Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist




Gene;

When doing an alignment, the first order of business is to know what the caster is on BOTH sides. There are too many variables to just set it at "max" caster, you may have two to three degrees difference between right and left.

ALERT! I have just ran across some Moog offset upper control arm bushings where the overall diameter of the small end is twenty thou LARGER than normal, and the larger end is not at spec's either. These were made in Taiwan.

Bob Drewes in SESD
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #137996 is a reply to message #137991] Mon, 08 August 2011 08:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
cool, good list

what I am hearing was:

The last few "professional" alignments that I saw here
said the caster was different on each side, when they were finished....

The consensus was, that this was ok ?

at the very least, we can check our current alignment by ourselves, at
home.....


gene


Pretty much, except that your sequence is wrong. Should be:
>
> just park on a level surface
> center the steering
> set the height (by the book)
> set the caster at = max (with or without offset bushings)
> set the camber = 0 (use a digital level across the rim)
> set the toe in = 0 ( measure f/ b from a good tread)
>
> drive the GMC 10 miles
> and do it again.
>
> If it drives good, that's "necessary & sufficient". Watch tread wear to be
> sure.
>
> Ken H.
>
>
--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: DIY alignment, another version [message #137997 is a reply to message #137983] Mon, 08 August 2011 08:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
g.winger is currently offline  g.winger   United States
Messages: 792
Registered: February 2008
Location: Warrenton,Missouri
Karma: 0
Senior Member
No,,, you do not want castor to be diffrent side to side. Thie is called cross castor. This is what causes pull. Or the wheel to pull to one side. Thats why you just don't set castor to "max' on both sides. It could be 2-3 degrees off.,,,,,,PL

Paul Leavitt
78 RB Royale
500 Caddy galvanized frame
Hubler front
Still no dash,,,,but I do maintain alignment machines that have done 2.2 million alignments,,,,,
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138000 is a reply to message #137997] Mon, 08 August 2011 08:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
It could be 2-3 degrees off.,,,,,,PL

well we are getting down to the short strokes on this
alignment issue.

2 to 3 degrees off --- sounds like a little exaggeration
since we cannot even get over 3 degrees --- max---.

a little "un-level" of the air system, would cause more caster than that
....

so would an alignment error of 1 degree, would that be a lot on our GMCs ??

and is that enough to cause a problem on our 12 ton monsters?

gene

> Paul Leavitt
> 78 RB Royale
> 500 Caddy galvanized frame
> Hubler front
> Still no dash,,,,but I do maintain alignment machines that have done
> 2.2 million alignments,,,,,
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138013 is a reply to message #137997] Mon, 08 August 2011 10:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
IF the caster on the pass side is 4 degrees, the driver side should be also,
under normal alignment proceedures. The same can be said of camber, both
sides the same. Toe in is a little more subject to interpretation. Some
prefer a little toe out when stationary on a front wheel drive, knowing that
when the suspension is under power that the front wheels will have a
tendency to drive around center and become slightly toed in. My preference
as well as many others, is to set the toe at 0 to 1/16" toed in. If it is
not wearing tires excessively, AND it does not pull consistently to one side
or the other, AND the steering has a neutral feel at highway speeds, then
probably best not to mess with it further. and yes I have also found that it
takes a few miles on a GMC suspension after a ride height adjustment to get
one to "take a set" or to settle into the place where it will remain
normally. Your results may vary.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Paul Leavitt <leavittpaul@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> No,,, you do not want castor to be diffrent side to side. Thie is called
> cross castor. This is what causes pull. Or the wheel to pull to one side.
> Thats why you just don't set castor to "max' on both sides. It could be 2-3
> degrees off.,,,,,,PL
>
> Paul Leavitt
> 78 RB Royale
> 500 Caddy galvanized frame
> Hubler front
> Still no dash,,,,but I do maintain alignment machines that have done
> 2.2 million alignments,,,,,
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138032 is a reply to message #138000] Mon, 08 August 2011 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mike miller   United States
Messages: 3576
Registered: February 2004
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Mr ERFisher wrote on Mon, 08 August 2011 06:53

... and is that enough to cause a problem on our 12 ton monsters?


6 tons

United States and Canada ton (short ton) = 2000 pounds
United Kingdom ton (long ton) = 2,240 pounds
Metric ton (tonne) = 1,000 kilograms = 2,205 pounds


Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo' http://m000035.blogspot.com
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138112 is a reply to message #137989] Mon, 08 August 2011 20:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
G'day,

I think there's been some misinterpretation about the alignment
recommendations I got from Dave Lenzi and published here.

I just got off the phone with Dave to make sure what I state below is "from
the horses mouth" not some other part of its anatomy! ;-)

To increase caster the upper ball joint must be moved rearwards.

Offset bushings accomplish this by moving it inwards towards the frame which
in turn moves it rearwards.

Installing the offset bushing in the rear "leg" of the upper control arm has
the greatest effect on caster.

Setting the adjuster for the rear "leg" of the upper control arm so that the
bolt is as close to the frame as possible moves the upper ball joint inwards
and rearwards also.

Therefore to obtain the maximum caster have the alignment company rotate the
rear adjuster so the bolt is as close to the frame as possible and then
adjust the front adjuster to get 0° degrees camber.

Dave suggested telling the alignment company / technician to; "obtain the
maximum positive caster of up to 5° while maintaining 0° camber."

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: DIY alignment, another version [message #138173 is a reply to message #137983] Tue, 09 August 2011 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
voodoolng is currently offline  voodoolng   United States
Messages: 40
Registered: February 2004
Location: Colo
Karma: 0
Member
If your looking for a slick pivot for your front tires. Try using your old front bearings.
Take in bearing one inner and outer race w/bearings and tack weld a plate on each race on the out side. on will need the space to clear the plate. Presto you have a turning pedistal that will turn like butter. Place under wheels and you can turn with your hands.
Can post a picture if needed. Thats how I do it when aligning the front end.
You guys with the one ton fronts don't forget that the truck spindle ball joint positions are different that the stock spindles, there is more of an offset for your caster when the wheels turn and the 4th aligmnet demension. Thats the smile shape on a happy face.


73 Glacier Voodoo lounge
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138179 is a reply to message #138173] Tue, 09 August 2011 12:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Tim,

What do you do about the lateral movement when you lower onto the turn
plates and when turning for caster measurement?

Ken H.


On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Tim Petras <voodoolng@msn.com> wrote:

>
>
> If your looking for a slick pivot for your front tires. Try using your old
> front bearings....
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138183 is a reply to message #138179] Tue, 09 August 2011 12:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
voodoolng is currently offline  voodoolng   United States
Messages: 40
Registered: February 2004
Location: Colo
Karma: 0
Member
If I understand you correctly.
The is no movement. The plates are parrell and horizontial. The bottom of the wheel sets on the upper plate. The bearing is just like on the coach but laying horizontial.
It helps when putting on the bearing plate lift up the coach under the A frame so suspensition has less movement on its set stance. I also lift the rear up the extra inch and quater for the bearing height.
Hope this helps.
I have had my 1 ton in for two years now and love it.
I also set the front end up 0-0-3 degress caster.
Will post a picture this evening in the voodoolng photos of the bearing plates.


73 Glacier Voodoo lounge
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138185 is a reply to message #138183] Tue, 09 August 2011 13:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
voodoolng is currently offline  voodoolng   United States
Messages: 40
Registered: February 2004
Location: Colo
Karma: 0
Member
Forgot to add you can put a block of wood behind the bearing plate and drive onto the pivot without disturbing the suspension.

73 Glacier Voodoo lounge
Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138186 is a reply to message #138185] Tue, 09 August 2011 13:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gary Worobec is currently offline  Gary Worobec   United States
Messages: 867
Registered: May 2005
Karma: -1
Senior Member
Hi,
Since the plates are not tied together how do you drive on to them with the
wood ramp without popping the top plate out of the bearing?

Thanks

Gary and Joanne Worobec
1973 GMC Glacier
Anza, CA

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Petras" <voodoolng@msn.com>
To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version


>
>
> Forgot to add you can put a block of wood behind the bearing plate and
> drive onto the pivot without disturbing the suspension.
> --
> 73 Glacier Voodoo lounge
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] DIY alignment, another version [message #138187 is a reply to message #138186] Tue, 09 August 2011 14:23 Go to previous message
voodoolng is currently offline  voodoolng   United States
Messages: 40
Registered: February 2004
Location: Colo
Karma: 0
Member
The plates are welded to the bearing races. The rollers are a 1/2 inch thick and set in the outerrace cup. They won't come apart.
The plates are 6 inches square, I used 1/4 plates.


73 Glacier Voodoo lounge
Previous Topic: Scammers in the swap meet section
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] What not to do when repainting a 1973 GMC Photo Log
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 07:34:44 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02428 seconds