GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds
[GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds [message #137693] Fri, 05 August 2011 23:03 Go to next message
glwgmc is currently offline  glwgmc   United States
Messages: 1014
Registered: June 2004
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Hi Jon,

Based on what my son found when he purchased a GMC 3500 truck with that engine, don't expect any greater fuel economy. It could turn out to be worse......

Jerry
Jerry and Sharon Work
78 Royale rear lounge
Kerby, OR
glwork@mac.com
http://jerrywork.com
541-592-5360



Message: 14
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:51:35 -0500
From: Jon Payne <embrep@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Message-ID: <2199c.4e3c57d7@gmc.mybirdfeeder.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"



Speaking of Dave's 8.1 Vortec, does anyone know when/if he will ever offer some kind of kit? I have seen some pictures of the engine as it was ready to be installed and after installation in the subframe and man it looks like it could of rolled off the production line that way. Truly a profession installation.

I'm sure if he does offer a kit it will be costly but worth it considering the quality. I understand he starts with an complete "drop out engine" from a salvage yard and the few that he has have low mileage.

I have seen some low mileage "drop out engine" on ebay from $2500 to $3500. Man, it would be nice to have a 8.1L Vortec!

Jon
--
Jon Payne
76 Palm Beach
Westfield,IN



_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Jerry & Sharon Work
78 Royale
Kerby, OR
Re: [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds [message #137702 is a reply to message #137693] Sat, 06 August 2011 00:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Jerry,

IIRC Dave noted that his mileage was normally as good as an Olds 455 and a
bit better at times.

Normal Olds Mileage as defined by Mr. ERF "8 - 10 mpg."

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry

Hi Jon,

Based on what my son found when he purchased a GMC 3500 truck with that
engine, don't expect any greater fuel economy. It could turn out to be
worse......

Jerry

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds [message #137783 is a reply to message #137702] Sat, 06 August 2011 18:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Rob Mueller <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> IIRC Dave noted that his mileage was normally as good as an Olds 455 and a
> bit better at times.
>
> Normal Olds Mileage as defined by Mr. ERF "8 - 10 mpg."
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Based on what my son found when he purchased a GMC 3500 truck with that
> engine, don't expect any greater fuel economy.  It could turn out to be
> worse......
>
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds [message #137819 is a reply to message #137783] Sun, 07 August 2011 01:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
jimk wrote on Sat, 06 August 2011 18:14

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Rob Mueller <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> IIRC Dave noted that his mileage was normally as good as an Olds 455 and a
> bit better at times.
>
> Normal Olds Mileage as defined by Mr. ERF "8 - 10 mpg."
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Based on what my son found when he purchased a GMC 3500 truck with that
> engine, don't expect any greater fuel economy.  It could turn out to be
> worse......
>
> Jerry


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502



I know Jim had something to say but I be darn if I can figure out what it was.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Manifolds vs. Headers 455 Olds [message #137967 is a reply to message #137819] Sun, 07 August 2011 23:24 Go to previous message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
The reason why the mileage can decrease is in the way you tend to
drive once one has more performance.
I for one can say that there is a gain in performance and mileage.
The Doug's headers are now designed with big opening at the flange.
Thorly will be following suite with larger opening.



On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Ken Burton <n9cv@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> jimk wrote on Sat, 06 August 2011 18:14
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Rob Mueller <robmueller@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>> > Jerry,
>> >
>> > IIRC Dave noted that his mileage was normally as good as an Olds 455 and a
>> > bit better at times.
>> >
>> > Normal Olds Mileage as defined by Mr. ERF "8 - 10 mpg."
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Rob M.
>> > Sydney, Australia
>> > AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
>> > USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jerry
>> >
>> > Hi Jon,
>> >
>> > Based on what my son found when he purchased a GMC 3500 truck with that
>> > engine, don't expect any greater fuel economy.  It could turn out to be
>> > worse......
>> >
>> > Jerry
>>
>>
>> Jim Kanomata
>> Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
>> jimk@appliedairfilters.com
>> http://www.appliedgmc.com
>> 1-800-752-7502
>
> I know Jim had something to say but I be darn if I can figure out what it was.
> --
> Ken Burton - N9KB
> 76 Palm Beach
> Hebron, Indiana
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Previous Topic: Copart Lot # 21670840 - 1978 GMC - (with TZE)
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Are windows for 73 model and 77 model GMC'sinterchangeable?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 01 04:38:06 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01763 seconds