GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Greenfoot Global, another additive (EnviroTabs)
Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134745] Fri, 15 July 2011 18:43 Go to next message
Who_dun_it is currently offline  Who_dun_it   United States
Messages: 176
Registered: April 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.

Thanks
Les
Thousand Oaks Ca
Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134749 is a reply to message #134745] Fri, 15 July 2011 19:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member

On Jul 15, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Les Leach wrote:

>
>
> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>
> Thanks
> Les
> Thousand Oaks Ca
Les, by now you should already know my opinion about additives!

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134817 is a reply to message #134749] Sat, 16 July 2011 11:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Who_dun_it is currently offline  Who_dun_it   United States
Messages: 176
Registered: April 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Karma: 1
Senior Member
emerystora wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 17:25


On Jul 15, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Les Leach wrote:

>
>
> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>
> Thanks
> Les
> Thousand Oaks Ca
Les, by now you should already know my opinion about additives!

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM

I usually put these products into the category of "Too good to be true".

Les
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Re: Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134831 is a reply to message #134745] Sat, 16 July 2011 13:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43

Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.

Thanks
Les
Thousand Oaks Ca

Well,

I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data. Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing.

As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134843 is a reply to message #134831] Sat, 16 July 2011 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Who_dun_it is currently offline  Who_dun_it   United States
Messages: 176
Registered: April 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Karma: 1
Senior Member
mcolie wrote on Sat, 16 July 2011 11:59

Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43

Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.

Thanks
Les
Thousand Oaks Ca

Well,

I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data. Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing.

As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.

Matt


This is not surprising to me, the layman. The lady that is plugging the stuff, a member of another motorhome group that we belong to, was telling about rocket scientists (really) and all the work that went into developing the product for this application. From my perspective, if you are looking for gas mileage, drive a small vehicle with a small engine.

Les
Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134845 is a reply to message #134843] Sat, 16 July 2011 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member

On Jul 16, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Les Leach wrote:

>
>
> mcolie wrote on Sat, 16 July 2011 11:59
>> Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
>>> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Les
>>> Thousand Oaks Ca
>>
>> Well,
>>
>> I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data. Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing.
>>
>> As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.
>>
>> Matt
>
>
> This is not surprising to me, the layman. The lady that is plugging the stuff, a member of another motorhome group that we belong to, was telling about rocket scientists (really) and all the work that went into developing the product for this application. From my perspective, if you are looking for gas mileage, drive a small vehicle with a small engine.
>
> Les

Les, if I were driving a rocket I might listen to "rocket scientists". Since I drive a car (or motorhome) I would rather listen to automotive engineers!

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #134848 is a reply to message #134845] Sat, 16 July 2011 16:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Applying "rocket science" to Detroit motor vehicles that were engineered by
the same people that brought you the vega, does not seem to me to have any
application. The technology in the GMC motor home, while pretty snazzy for
the 70s, relied on basic engineering concepts and methods that were present
in the mid 50s, with the added influence of bean counters. Not much rocket
science here. They can benefit somewhat from improved fuel delivery systems
and certainly the aluminum radiators are a good addition. But a brass tanked
fin and tube soldered radiator has a very long service life, which is just
about up. Not too much wrong with a pilot light on a water heater or a range
either. Better than scratching your head wondering if your $100.00 printed
circuit board is at fault, or if you are only out of Propane. Onan
generators have at least a 2500 hour service life between overhauls, but the
circuit board controller probably does not, considering that they were
assembled by human hands and the components were all mounted, not
integrated, and most of the connections were soldered by hand. Those types
of boards are subject to vibration failures as well as overheat and voltage
spikes. If you follow the messages on the net for any time at all, that and
ignition and fuel delivery problems are the most common.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Emery Stora <emerystora@mac.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 16, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Les Leach wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > mcolie wrote on Sat, 16 July 2011 11:59
> >> Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
> >>> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had
> information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these
> products as just another way to get our money.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Les
> >>> Thousand Oaks Ca
> >>
> >> Well,
> >>
> >> I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data.
> Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and
> validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing
> engine testing.
> >>
> >> As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.
> >>
> >> Matt
> >
> >
> > This is not surprising to me, the layman. The lady that is plugging the
> stuff, a member of another motorhome group that we belong to, was telling
> about rocket scientists (really) and all the work that went into developing
> the product for this application. From my perspective, if you are looking
> for gas mileage, drive a small vehicle with a small engine.
> >
> > Les
>
> Les, if I were driving a rocket I might listen to "rocket scientists".
> Since I drive a car (or motorhome) I would rather listen to automotive
> engineers!
>
> Emery Stora
> 77 Kingsley
> Santa Fe, NM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #135092 is a reply to message #134831] Mon, 18 July 2011 19:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
And what would your employers - or ANY auto manufacturer give for ANYthing which didn't affect driveability but gave a noticeable mileage increase?  Can you say 'rich beyond your wildest dreams....'?
 
--johnny


--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 6:59 PM




Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
> Has anyone had experience with this "product"?  I recently had information handed to me about this.  Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>
> Thanks
> Les
> Thousand Oaks Ca

Well,

I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data.  Their data is not complete.  It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data.  But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing. 

As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.

Matt
--
Matt & Mary Colie
'73 Glacier 23 Chaumiere (say show-me-air)
SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #135093 is a reply to message #135092] Mon, 18 July 2011 20:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
There is this first law of thermodynamics thing that gets in the way of things like this, and perpetual motion machines.

Which reminds me.... Gravity, it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW<G>


Dolph Santorine

DE N8JPC
Wheeling, West Virginia
dolph@dolphsantorine.com

1976 GMC 26'
TZE166V101610






On Jul 18, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Johnny Bridges wrote:

> And what would your employers - or ANY auto manufacturer give for ANYthing which didn't affect driveability but gave a noticeable mileage increase? Can you say 'rich beyond your wildest dreams....'?
>
> --johnny
>
>
> --- On Sat, 7/16/11, Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 6:59 PM
>
>
>
>
> Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
>> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Les
>> Thousand Oaks Ca
>
> Well,
>
> I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data. Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing.
>
> As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie
> '73 Glacier 23 Chaumiere (say show-me-air)
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #135099 is a reply to message #135093] Mon, 18 July 2011 20:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hardie Johnson is currently offline  Hardie Johnson   United States
Messages: 483
Registered: January 2004
Location: Raleigh NC
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Dolph Santorine wrote on Mon, 18 July 2011 21:00

There is this first law of thermodynamics thing that gets in the way of things like this, and perpetual motion machines.
Which reminds me.... Gravity, it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW<G>
Dolph Santorine
<>

Gravity is like BS; it's everywhere.


Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
Raleigh NC
Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #135157 is a reply to message #135093] Tue, 19 July 2011 08:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
True, but as soon as my 35 million com,es in from the banker in Uganda I'm helping, I'll have enough money to repeal the First Law!
 
--johnny


--- On Tue, 7/19/11, Dolph Santorine <dolph@dolphsantorine.com> wrote:


From: Dolph Santorine <dolph@dolphsantorine.com>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2011, 1:00 AM


There is this first law of thermodynamics thing that gets in the way of things like this, and perpetual motion machines.

Which reminds me.... Gravity, it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW<G>


Dolph Santorine

DE N8JPC
Wheeling, West Virginia
dolph@dolphsantorine.com

1976 GMC 26'
TZE166V101610






On Jul 18, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Johnny Bridges wrote:

> And what would your employers - or ANY auto manufacturer give for ANYthing which didn't affect driveability but gave a noticeable mileage increase?  Can you say 'rich beyond your wildest dreams....'?

> --johnny
>
>
> --- On Sat, 7/16/11, Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 6:59 PM
>
>
>
>
> Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
>> Has anyone had experience with this "product"?  I recently had information handed to me about this.  Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Les
>> Thousand Oaks Ca
>
> Well,
>
> I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data.  Their data is not complete.  It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data.  But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing. 
>
> As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie
> '73 Glacier 23 Chaumiere (say show-me-air)
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive [message #135200 is a reply to message #135157] Tue, 19 July 2011 13:36 Go to previous message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
Must be true, I read it on the Internet.

Right after GM was assimilated by Obama, a group of bureaucrats visited GM with a list of demands for a new car. One of the engineers commented on their demand for 150 miles per gallon, saying that it violated the laws of physics. They wanted to know who's law that was so they could get it repealed.

Dolph Santorine

adolph@Santorine.org

Excuse me for not being my usual wordy and sporadically verbose self. This message is sent from my iPhone.

No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

On Jul 19, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Johnny Bridges <jhbridges@ymail.com> wrote:

> True, but as soon as my 35 million com,es in from the banker in Uganda I'm helping, I'll have enough money to repeal the First Law!
>
> --johnny
>
>
> --- On Tue, 7/19/11, Dolph Santorine <dolph@dolphsantorine.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Dolph Santorine <dolph@dolphsantorine.com>
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2011, 1:00 AM
>
>
> There is this first law of thermodynamics thing that gets in the way of things like this, and perpetual motion machines.
>
> Which reminds me.... Gravity, it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW<G>
>
>
> Dolph Santorine
>
> DE N8JPC
> Wheeling, West Virginia
> dolph@dolphsantorine.com
>
> 1976 GMC 26'
> TZE166V101610
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Johnny Bridges wrote:
>
>> And what would your employers - or ANY auto manufacturer give for ANYthing which didn't affect driveability but gave a noticeable mileage increase? Can you say 'rich beyond your wildest dreams....'?
>>
>> --johnny
>>
>>
>> --- On Sat, 7/16/11, Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Matt Colie <matt7323tze@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Greenfoot Global, another additive
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 6:59 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 15 July 2011 19:43
>>> Has anyone had experience with this "product"? I recently had information handed to me about this. Generally, I regard all of these products as just another way to get our money.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Les
>>> Thousand Oaks Ca
>>
>> Well,
>>
>> I took more time than I should have wasted to digest the published data. Their data is not complete. It takes WAY MORE than they did to confirm and validate emissions data. But hey, I only spent about thirty years doing engine testing.
>>
>> As for fuel rate testing - there were none of the required controls.
>>
>> Matt
>> --
>> Matt & Mary Colie
>> '73 Glacier 23 Chaumiere (say show-me-air)
>> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Towable Vehicle
Next Topic: checking oil in air conditioning compressor
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 21:35:04 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03908 seconds