GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] GMC Digi Panel
[GMCnet] GMC Digi Panel [message #118363] Thu, 10 March 2011 18:42 Go to previous message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma:
Senior Member

G'day,

Below you will find a series of emails discussing the Digi Panel.

Regards,
Rob M.
USAussie - Downunder
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426

************************************************************************

From: Digi Devices [mailto:digidevicesinc@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:51 PM
To: Rob Mueller
Subject: Re: GMC Digi Panel

Hi Rob-
 
No, there's no way you could do the conversion yourself without me
sending LOTS of directions. LOL So yes, you'd need to remove it and send it
to us.
 
The cost of the conversion is $20.00 which is mostly labor time plus the new
oil sender costs $16.89 plus $10.00 S&H. So the total is $46.89.
 
We don't take credit cards any more, so if you decide to proceed, just
enclose a check with the unit made our to "Digi-Devices % Art Woodell".
 
Art

************************************************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Mueller
To: 'Digi Devices'
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: GMC Digi Panel

Art,

Thanks for your response.

Can I convert the Digi-Panel myself or do I have to remove it and send it to
you.

If I remove it and send it to you what is the charge to modify it and supply
the sender.

Regards,
Rob

************************************************************************

From: Digi Devices [mailto:digidevicesinc@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:16 PM
To: Rob Mueller
Subject: Re: GMC Digi Panel

The standard Digi-Panel comes with its own oil pressure sender. The whole
idea of the -J model for the GMC MHs was to eliminate this requirement (easy
installation) since the oil pressure sender on the Olds engine is at the
front of the engine.
 
The one requirement of the GMC setup is that the factory oil pressure
gauge must be working since it gets its voltage from across the factory
sender.
 
The only way to get around this is to convert your -J model to a standard
unit. We supply the unit with its own sender. The normal installation has
you remove the factory sender, install a nipple and T, put the factory
sender in one side of the T and our sender in the other side.
 
If you wish to pursue this, let me know. I'll be out of town starting
tomorrow morning through Monday.
 
Best wishes!
Art Woodell

************************************************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Mueller
To: digidevicesinc@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 12:40 PM
Subject: GMC Digi Panel

Hi,

I was having electrical problems with my GMC instruments. The fuse that
powers them kept blowing. Whenever it blew I lost my Digi Panel oil pressure
indication.

I decided to connect the Digi Panel oil pressure reading to a second and
separate OEM sender, however, when I did so it did not work.

I removed the Digi Panel connection from the second sender and re-connected
to the sender that feeds the OEM gage and it worked again.

Is it technically possible to connect the Digi Panel to a second sender and
have it work?

Regards,
Rob

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Steering Wheel for Bukzin
Next Topic: Small water leak at top of windshield? when it rains
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 17 03:46:09 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02226 seconds