GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Wireless N Adapter
Wireless N Adapter [message #116053] Tue, 22 February 2011 00:07 Go to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
1 Sale a Day has USB wireless n adapters for sale. Looks like a good deal to me, though I just bought the wireless g last week - Doh!

<https://1saleaday.com/wireless>


Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: Wireless N Adapter [message #116055 is a reply to message #116053] Tue, 22 February 2011 00:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
That is a good deal LArry, 2 watts. Wonder how much shipping is?
dan


3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
Re: Wireless N Adapter [message #116056 is a reply to message #116055] Tue, 22 February 2011 00:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
WD0AFQ wrote on Tue, 22 February 2011 00:22

That is a good deal LArry, 2 watts. Wonder how much shipping is?
dan



$4.99


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Wireless N Adapter [message #116057 is a reply to message #116056] Tue, 22 February 2011 00:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
Still a good deal.

3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
Re: Wireless N Adapter [message #116103 is a reply to message #116053] Tue, 22 February 2011 13:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cbwoodsr is currently offline  cbwoodsr   United States
Messages: 1063
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Just remember they are built for USB 2.0;
Otherwise UR milage may differ


CBWood
77 Kingslay
MWC OK
ONLINE PARTS PROGRAM
www.GMCMHParts.com

Re: Wireless N Adapter [message #116142 is a reply to message #116053] Tue, 22 February 2011 19:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jtblank is currently offline  jtblank   United States
Messages: 237
Registered: June 2007
Location: Tulare, CA
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Thanks for the "heads up", I ordered one as I have the perfect place to try it. Every May a group of us go camping in Pismo at the North Beach State Campgrounds, there are tons of open signals but signal strength is so low that netflix really drags.... we will see and I'll post the results.


John Blankenship '76 Palm Beach Tulare, CA
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter [message #116160 is a reply to message #116103] Tue, 22 February 2011 22:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member

They should still work with an ancient USB 1.1
only computer. The range would be identical
because power and sensitivity would remain the
same regardless of the type of USB. Speeds
would, naturally, be reduced from what you can
obtain with the USB 2.0 capability.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ex-Palm Beach, 76 ~ ~ ~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~



----------------------------------------
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> From: cbwoodsr@swbell.net
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:20:47 -0600
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter
>
>
>
> Just remember they are built for USB 2.0;
> Otherwise UR milage may differ
> --
> CBWood
> 77 Kingslay
> MWC OK
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter [message #116164 is a reply to message #116160] Tue, 22 February 2011 22:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Byron Songer is currently offline  Byron Songer   United States
Messages: 1912
Registered: August 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Karma: -2
Senior Member

As to wireless N standard -- keep this in mind. You may be able to operate
at that speed but if the access point you're going through is still
supporting B and G you'll still be at the lower speed. And, if that AP has
lots of traffic whatever capability you have just went south.

I'm not trying to disappoint anyone but I do believe the expectation level
needs to be clarified.

Byron Songer
1978 Royale by Coachmen
Louisville, KY
Personal - http://web.me.com/bnsonger
Eastern States - http://www.gmceast.com



D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:

>
> They should still work with an ancient USB 1.1
> only computer. The range would be identical
> because power and sensitivity would remain the
> same regardless of the type of USB. Speeds
> would, naturally, be reduced from what you can
> obtain with the USB 2.0 capability.
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
> ~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
> ~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
> ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
> ~ ~ ~ ex-Palm Beach, 76 ~ ~ ~
> ~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> From: cbwoodsr@swbell.net
>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:20:47 -0600
>> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter
>>
>>
>>
>> Just remember they are built for USB 2.0;
>> Otherwise UR milage may differ
>> --
>> CBWood
>> 77 Kingslay
>> MWC OK
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



-- Byron Songer
Full-timing to enjoy the USA
Former owner but still an admirer
GMC paint schemes at -
http://www.songerconsulting.net
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter [message #116168 is a reply to message #116164] Tue, 22 February 2011 23:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Byron Songer wrote on Tue, 22 February 2011 22:40

As to wireless N standard -- keep this in mind. You may be able to operate
at that speed but if the access point you're going through is still
supporting B and G you'll still be at the lower speed. And, if that AP has
lots of traffic whatever capability you have just went south.

I'm not trying to disappoint anyone but I do believe the expectation level
needs to be clarified.

Byron Songer
1978 Royale by Coachmen
Louisville, KY
Personal - http://web.me.com/bnsonger
Eastern States - http://www.gmceast.com



AND if the access point you connect to supports N, B, and G you would hope that you are home free. You are until someone else connects to your same access point at a slower speed. Then the AP shifts to the slower B or G speed to accommodate them.

One other note the faster the connection speed the shorter the range.

I'm not trying to talk anyone out of buying these. The previous versions have been very good for longer range connections. I assume they are using the same receiver in these and they ought to operate well.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter [message #116169 is a reply to message #116168] Tue, 22 February 2011 23:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
Still a bargain at the price folks paid for them today.
dan


3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
deal is over [message #116170 is a reply to message #116169] Tue, 22 February 2011 23:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bukzin is currently offline  bukzin   United States
Messages: 840
Registered: April 2004
Location: North California
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Just checked (its 9:29 PST) and seems that deal is over.

Glad I got my order in before it went away.


Bukzin
1977 Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless N Adapter [message #116196 is a reply to message #116168] Wed, 23 February 2011 08:07 Go to previous message
Byron Songer is currently offline  Byron Songer   United States
Messages: 1912
Registered: August 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Karma: -2
Senior Member

Ken, thanks for throwing in that kernel of truth. I thought about it but
didn't want to sound too depressing. As Dan pointed out, it was still a good
price.

My experience so far is that not that many wireless hosts have N capability.
And of those that do there are always G users on board to pull the speed
back for the sake of compatibility. Like 4G for cellular, in a few years
everyone will have upgraded equipment and N will become more pervasive.

Byron Songer
1978 Royale by Coachmen
Louisville, KY
Personal - http://web.me.com/bnsonger
Eastern States - http://www.gmceast.com



Ken Burton wrote:

>
>
> Byron Songer wrote on Tue, 22 February 2011 22:40
>> As to wireless N standard -- keep this in mind. You may be able to operate
>> at that speed but if the access point you're going through is still
>> supporting B and G you'll still be at the lower speed. And, if that AP has
>> lots of traffic whatever capability you have just went south.
>>
>> I'm not trying to disappoint anyone but I do believe the expectation level
>> needs to be clarified.
>>
>> Byron Songer
>> 1978 Royale by Coachmen
>> Louisville, KY
>> Personal - http://web.me.com/bnsonger
>> Eastern States - http://www.gmceast.com
>
> AND if the access point you connect to supports N, B, and G you would hope
> that you are home free. You are until someone else connects to your same
> access point at a slower speed. Then the AP shifts to the slower B or G speed
> to accommodate them.
>
> One other note the faster the connection speed the shorter the range.
>
> I'm not trying to talk anyone out of buying these. The previous versions have
> been very good for longer range connections. I assume they are using the same
> receiver in these and they ought to operate well.


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



-- Byron Songer
Full-timing to enjoy the USA
Former owner but still an admirer
GMC paint schemes at -
http://www.songerconsulting.net
Previous Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Rear bogie arrangement question
Next Topic: Spam access - leyonin on Swap Meet
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 06 21:27:14 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01290 seconds