GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] New RV Buddies article
Re: [GMCnet] New RV Buddies article [message #112780] Sun, 23 January 2011 16:21 Go to previous message
Gary Casey is currently offline  Gary Casey   United States
Messages: 448
Registered: September 2009
Karma:
Senior Member
Jim,
Good question, and it's true, but.... The objective of the braking system is to
be ABLE to lock up all 6. It's up to the driver to use that ability. And the
peak friction coefficient on dry paving is about 0.9 (maybe 1.0 for car tires
and even higher for race tires) and the friction of a locked wheel is only a
little less - maybe 0.8 to 0.85. So, yes, you would like to be able to apply
all the brakes just to the point of locking, but not quite. How do you do that
in the real world (without anti-skid) - and do it equally on all 6 wheels?
Answer is, you can't, so for braking on dry paving the best bet is simply to
lock them all up and see what happens. No, you won't be able to maneuver, but
the statistics I have seen say that it is better just to lock 'em up. As usual
though, every potential accident is unique. And the weight of the vehicl
doesn't change the objective. 2,000 pounds or 200,000 you still want to stop up
to the limit of the tiresw whether you have 4 or 18 wheels. Now for 2 wheel
vehicles it's a different story...
Gary


I only pose one question. Why would any reasonable, thinking, person want to
"lock up the brakes" on a 12.000 pound vehicle? The shortest stopping
distances are achieved at some point before wheel lock up occurs.
Jim Hupy




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] TZE167V100577
Next Topic: Holy Grail...or?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 29 07:29:00 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00624 seconds