GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] shocked and amazed
Re: [GMCnet] shocked and amazed [message #109458] Wed, 22 December 2010 16:00 Go to next message
Gary Casey is currently offline  Gary Casey   United States
Messages: 448
Registered: September 2009
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Yes, the Seville was based on the Nova - really just trim upgrades to make it
into a Cadillac. But it was quite a nice car compared to the Nova. Driving one
would not give you a clue that it was a Nova. But I don't recall that the
engine was anything but a standard Olds 350. We used a lot of Oldsmobiles for
testing and what made the engine a "Cadillac" was the intake manifold, which was
very flat, without any runners at all. I was so convinced that GM had a bad
design that I started a project to design a EFI-specific intake manifold. By
the way, I would think the Seville intake manifold would bolt right on the 403,
making it easy to convert to port injection. Turned out the simple bathtub
design was pretty good and we gave up trying to make it better. Yes, that was
the time of the corporate engine debacle, but I think the bigger "problem" was
Chevy small blocks showing up in Oldsmobiles and Buicks. Somehow, selling a
Nova as a Cadillac didn't bother anyone, but putting a Chevy engine in an
Oldsmobile did. Go figure. As I recall, the Olds engine in the Seville was
painted Cadillac blue, but I don't remember - that and a lot of other things
:-(.
Gary Casey

""Another anecdote from history: When we at Bendix were developing the fuel
injection for the Cadillac Seville (about 1976) we tried to abide by GM's
"rule"
of no rubber fuel lines on top of the engine. We were able to do away with the
short rubber hoses that Bosch used between the rail and each injector, but to
get rid of the rubber line between the pressure regulator and the rail we would
have to pay Bosch some big bucks for tooling.""

Ah yes--the famous Oldsmobile engine in drag debacle. Actually that Seville was
an X car (aka Nova) with an Olds engine with specific Cadillac heads on it.
That's what sparked (no pun intended) the huge lawsuit about GM cheating
Cadillac cutomers with Oldsmobile engines. That's when GM decided to go to
so-called corporate engines and paint them all black. The car itself was quite
nice and became somehwhat of a collectible.
--
Bob de Kruyff



_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] shocked and amazed [message #109465 is a reply to message #109458] Wed, 22 December 2010 16:48 Go to previous message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Don't guess it takes a genius to figure out what happened to Corporate GM in
the global view of things. No wonder the obamagate bailout was necessary.
And this was the time of the GMC too. We used to have some "hot" questions
for the tech reps in those days. I still think that the GM training centers
like the one in Tigard, Or was better than what replaced them.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC Royale 403

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Gary Casey <casey.gary@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Yes, the Seville was based on the Nova - really just trim upgrades to make
> it
> into a Cadillac. But it was quite a nice car compared to the Nova.
> Driving one
> would not give you a clue that it was a Nova. But I don't recall that the
> engine was anything but a standard Olds 350. We used a lot of Oldsmobiles
> for
> testing and what made the engine a "Cadillac" was the intake manifold,
> which was
> very flat, without any runners at all. I was so convinced that GM had a
> bad
> design that I started a project to design a EFI-specific intake manifold.
> By
> the way, I would think the Seville intake manifold would bolt right on the
> 403,
> making it easy to convert to port injection. Turned out the simple bathtub
> design was pretty good and we gave up trying to make it better. Yes, that
> was
> the time of the corporate engine debacle, but I think the bigger "problem"
> was
> Chevy small blocks showing up in Oldsmobiles and Buicks. Somehow, selling
> a
> Nova as a Cadillac didn't bother anyone, but putting a Chevy engine in an
> Oldsmobile did. Go figure. As I recall, the Olds engine in the Seville
> was
> painted Cadillac blue, but I don't remember - that and a lot of other
> things
> :-(.
> Gary Casey
>
> ""Another anecdote from history: When we at Bendix were developing the fuel
> injection for the Cadillac Seville (about 1976) we tried to abide by GM's
> "rule"
> of no rubber fuel lines on top of the engine. We were able to do away with
> the
> short rubber hoses that Bosch used between the rail and each injector, but
> to
> get rid of the rubber line between the pressure regulator and the rail we
> would
> have to pay Bosch some big bucks for tooling.""
>
> Ah yes--the famous Oldsmobile engine in drag debacle. Actually that Seville
> was
> an X car (aka Nova) with an Olds engine with specific Cadillac heads on it.
> That's what sparked (no pun intended) the huge lawsuit about GM cheating
> Cadillac cutomers with Oldsmobile engines. That's when GM decided to go to
> so-called corporate engines and paint them all black. The car itself was
> quite
> nice and became somehwhat of a collectible.
> --
> Bob de Kruyff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Previous Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Headliner Quality
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Mobil1 tranny fluid
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 19 17:28:44 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00978 seconds