|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Page 1 [message #102323 is a reply to message #102285] |
Sat, 09 October 2010 08:45   |
midlf
Messages: 2212
Registered: July 2007
Location: SE Wisc. (Palmyra)
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yowzah - $600+ bucks and not available for an Olds engine! Makes me thing very favorably about Patterson. However I do appreciate the posting. There are a lot of good ideas for us in other parts of the motorsports hobbies and industrial venues.
Steve Southworth
1974 Glacier TZE064V100150 (for workin on)
1975 Transmode TZE365V100394 (parts & spares)
Palmyra WI
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Page 1 [message #102428 is a reply to message #102323] |
Sun, 10 October 2010 16:27 |
 |
mike miller
Messages: 3576
Registered: February 2004
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
| midlf wrote on Sat, 09 October 2010 06:45 |
Yowzah - $600+ bucks and not available for an Olds engine! Makes me thing very favorably about Patterson. However I do appreciate the posting. There are a lot of good ideas for us in other parts of the motorsports hobbies and industrial venues.
|
It is interesting. Most newer high performance engines where designed with a system like this... or even one coil for each cylinder.
BUT... the main advantage is to increase available spark at higher RPM's. (When a single coil doesn't have time to fully charge between sparks.) Most of us do not run our GMC motors at high enough RPM's to NEED this product. (Now if you turbo it and NEED a hotter spark.... )
Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo'
http://m000035.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
