GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » interesting new engine design
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design [message #67777 is a reply to message #67767] Fri, 18 December 2009 16:55 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma:
Senior Member
ljdavick wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 14:09

<snip>
I've always wondered why turbines weren't more prevalent for generating electricity on small sites. I had always tought that big diesel motors powering generators would be less efficient than small natural gas powered turbines. But then, I'm just guessing!

Larry Davick
The Mystery Machine

Larry,

There is a very simple fact that has kept gas turbines flying and not sitting still. (An exception will be noted after the relevant discussion.)

Gas turbines have one big feature, very high power to weight ratio. They also have two very large considerations, very high cost to manufacture and really poor (high) part load fuel rate.

Diesel engines have two big features relatively inexpensive to manufacture and very good part load fuel rate. Diesel engines have one consideration, low power to weight ratio.

The cost to manufacture a gas turbine is so high that when a "hot section" job - replacing all the parts that see fire - has to be done, it is just a little cheaper than buying a new power unit (engine).

The internal parasitic loads on a gas turbine do not decrease with output power. This is such that one unit we were mapping had a fuel rate at idle that was just a little less than 3/4 of the full power fuel rate. At design load, the unit had a fuel rate that was diesel-like (0.48#/shp-hr). Diesels almost don't use fuel at idle and that scales through the load curve.

Small gas turbines were starting to show up in the early 70's. Fuel was not a big cost issue until the first oil scare (learned a lot - haven't we?). Solar, Williams, Paxton and Air Research were a few of them. The military bought them and may still.

The exception that I promised to mention.
There have been more than a few recent gas turbine electric plants built all over the country (well, anyplace natural gas is economically available). These are installed as "All or Nothing" peak load units. As they are acceptably fuel efficient at design load, that is the only place that they are used. The local grid still has to be balanced with steam or hydro that does not take a beating to run at part load.

I really tried, but if you can't understand my answer, just tell me and I will try again.

Matt Colie


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Off Topic - 787
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] GMC's In PA
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 18:19:39 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00645 seconds