Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » interesting new engine design
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design [message #67754 is a reply to message #67751] |
Fri, 18 December 2009 08:18 |
Steven Ferguson
Messages: 3447 Registered: May 2006
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
A big problem with patents is the expense involved with obtaining
foreign patents. It is well beyond anyone below the corporate level
and I think this is why some of the stuff we read and hear about
(smokey Yunik's homogenized process engine) never make it to
production. Probably the most innovative mass production engine in
the last 20 years is the Honda CVCC design.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Mike Miller <m000035@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> hertfordnc wrote on Fri, 18 December 2009 04:16
>> How come none of these "revolutionary" powerplants is never invented by someone who doesn't care who gets credit?
>>
>> These stories were slightly more believable before the internet.
>>
>> But if I invented a real solution to the energy problem and started to meet conspirtorial resisitance from the patent office or Exxon or the Masons, i'd just publish the whole thing and tell the world how to build their own. ...
>
>
> The other thing that makes me wonder, "they" always say that the car companies bought the patents to keep others from building it... even the inventor. The complaint is the inventor wanted everyone to be using his (insert item here). Most of the time it was so long ago that the patents would have expired, so why doesn't the inventor publish the plans now? (Or even build the item?)
> --
> Mike Miller
> `73 26' X Painted D.
> `78 23' Birchaven
> Hillsboro, OR
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
--
Steve Ferguson
'76 EII
Sierra Vista, AZ
Urethane bushing source
www.bdub.net/ferguson/
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
|
|
interesting new engine design
By: fred v on Wed, 16 December 2009 21:34
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
By: ljdavick on Wed, 16 December 2009 22:47
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
By: Chr$ on Wed, 16 December 2009 22:43
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
By: fred v on Thu, 17 December 2009 07:44
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: GMC_LES on Thu, 17 December 2009 10:32
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: ljdavick on Thu, 17 December 2009 10:53
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: fred v on Fri, 18 December 2009 06:52
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: USAussie on Fri, 18 December 2009 12:37
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: GMC_LES on Fri, 18 December 2009 08:29
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: ljdavick on Fri, 18 December 2009 10:47
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: jhb1 on Fri, 18 December 2009 12:18
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: ljdavick on Fri, 18 December 2009 13:09
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: ljdavick on Fri, 18 December 2009 19:07
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] interesting new engine design
By: comcast on Sat, 19 December 2009 09:58
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
By: fred v on Fri, 18 December 2009 12:53
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
|
|
|
Re: interesting new engine design
By: mdryan on Fri, 18 December 2009 10:03
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 25 13:27:32 CDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 1.76658 seconds
|