GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » The impact of extra weight on GMC handling (a theory)
The impact of extra weight on GMC handling [message #327154] Fri, 15 December 2017 19:48 Go to previous message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma:
Senior Member
Most of yall have at least seen photos of the Princes custom coach. The black one with the custom EVERYTHING including a full size washer and dryer.

That coach was donated earlier this year to the RV Hall of Fame in Elkhart, IN. We saw it when we toured the museum. Rumor has it that the coach just did not handle right and they gave up on it.

At first I thought that was BS because the air bag PSI could just be increased to carry basically any weight. And then I realized that our bogie arms are part of the steering system...not supposed to be but they are. We've all seen or experienced the effects of rut wander and noticed the wheels twist and move out of line when parking. When the leading arm bogie leaves the track it can steer the coach. The GMC engineers designed the bogie arm casting for the standard weight of the coach.

My thinking is that when excess load (weight) is placed on the suspension, the front leading bogie arm, which we already know can move around quite a bit, is more prone to move out of line because of the additional weight. This would explain why the Prince coach might have been a driving handful.

Just a theory. I'm not an engineer but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.

Thoughts?



Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: dist cap
Next Topic: Power Drive
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 03:39:38 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00862 seconds