| Re: [GMCnet] Emission Controls [message #325019 is a reply to message #325016] |
Mon, 16 October 2017 19:15   |
johnd01
Messages: 354
Registered: July 2017
Location: Sacrameot
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Are you sure these units do not have an extra 100,000 miles on them.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Cesar Carrasco
wrote:
> Hello fellow GMCer's, I just recently bought two GMC RV's. One is a 1973
> 23' Sequoia, the other is a 1974 26' Glacier(both are in the registry).
> The Sequoia (66k miles) had the motor, trans and final drive rebuilt, it
> has a holly carb and headers; and what from what I can see it doesn't have
> the emission control parts. The Glacier (51k miles) appears to be all
> original. I live in Riverside California and both RV's are exempt from smog
> checks. I would like to get your thoughts on whether or not to remove the
> emissions controls. For example the distributor spark retarding vacuum,
> etc. and any others you may or may not recommend.
>
> What are the pros and cons?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
*John Phillips*
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Johnd01
John Phillips
Avion A2600 TZE064V101164
Rancho Cordova, CA (Sacramento)
|
|
|
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
