GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » porous aluminum tranny pan
Re: [GMCnet] porous aluminum tranny pan [message #324202 is a reply to message #324195] Fri, 22 September 2017 11:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Kosier is currently offline  Kosier   United States
Messages: 834
Registered: February 2008
Karma:
Senior Member
Karen,

Back in the late 50s, I worked for a shop that had a contract to do the
machine
work on 3k aluminum castings that were the body for an oxygen regulator for
breathing oxygen for the USAF. After we finished, they went to the people
who assembled and tested them. We heard the castings were all porous.
We were ecstatic, as we thought we would get to do it over again. Alas, we
heard they treated them with waterglass and saved them. I once told Ken
Henderson that fact he was still alive proved that it worked. That's all I
know about the subject.

Gary Kosier
77PB w/500Cad
Newark, Ohio

--------------------------------------------------
From: "KB"
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 12:07 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] porous aluminum tranny pan

> James Hupy wrote on Fri, 22 September 2017 07:32
>> Karen, it would have better if you had asked this question BEFORE you
>> installed the pan. I could have saved you a few steps in this process. I
>> too have a Ragusa Pan on my transmission. It too seeped fluid. The
>> casting
>> is porus and tranny fluid is very thin when it is warm. I removed my pan
>> with the intention of sealing it some way. I have a friend with a
>> transmission shop, and he has a handy dandy parts washer and special
>> solvents that gets rid of all traces of transmission fluid. After I paid
>> him a nominal sum to wash my pan, I coated it with 2 thick coats of
>> GLYPTAL
>> INSULATING VARNISH. Then I baked it in my powder coating oven overnight
>> at
>> 125 degrees. The baking step speeds up the cure rate of the varnish. It
>> will air dry, but takes several days. I reinstalled the pan. It has been
>> several years and a couple of cross country trips and so far, no leaks.
>> Nothing is forever, but this comes close. I wouldn't try powder coating
>> or
>> line-x bedliner. But, you do as you want. It is your money and time that
>> you are spending.
>> Jim Hupy
>
>
> Thanks Jim. If I'd known before, I'd have bought a different pan. I'd
> prefer not to replace it at this point though, they ain't cheap.
> I've also heard of using waterglass. Know anything about that? The
> only problem with the glyptal is it's insulating. Not a biggie,
> but keeping the cooling ability would be nice. Gotta do something cuz
> it's a mess.
>
> thanks!
> Karen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Storage in Phoenix
Next Topic: High torque starter?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 09 03:31:49 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01649 seconds