GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » new engines for the GMCs
Re: new engines for the GMCs [message #316345 is a reply to message #316344] Thu, 20 April 2017 18:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma:
Senior Member
Mike S wrote on Thu, 20 April 2017 18:08
...
It takes X amount of energy to move Y mass vs drag/ mechanical load. It's why we get the same mileage no matter what gear we put in. The ls motors at best are 5-10% more mechanically efficient than the 455. ...

So the short answer is it will be fine, any gear you run. Look at your trucks, it will pull down the road that 4 ton trailer at 1800 rpm until you hit a hill and need more power. Then it adds fuel until it can't compensate, then it down shifts.


I'd tend to agree. Our diesel pusher has 330 HP and 850 ft lbs of torque. I have an aftermarket product that hooks into the coach computers and displays lots of stuff including HP and torque in real time. Even with a 26000 (empty) coach with the aerodynamics of a concrete block, it takes less than 100 HP and 250 ft lbs of torque to maintain 55 on flat ground. Hit a hill and both numbers and gallons/minute of fuel rate go up and the 6 speed Allison downshifts if the RPM gets down near the peak torque RPM (1550 RPM)...depending on which transmission mode I'm in.

My concern is how much torque the 6.0 (LS) has at 2500 RPM without a smart tranny and lots of gears and a lockout converter. While I can assure you that my 1/2 ton with the 6.0 will cruise at 60 at 1500 (or less), as SOON as I hit a hill, the RPM goes up either because the lockout converter unlocks or it downshifts. It's so smooth you can't tell unless you're watching the readouts but it does. The thing is, I don't know what it would do if there was a way to hold it at 2000 RPM and try to accelerate without downshifting. I'm suspecting not that well but probably at least as good as my 403. I also get about 18-19 on the highway. BUT, if I put any load on it due to a trailer the mileage tanks. Even an empty flatbed car hauler (weights about 2000 lbs)causes mileage to drop to 10 mpg. Put a car on the trailer and expect 5-6 mpg. It will still skoot with the weight but might go to 3rd at 60 and 5500 RPM which just ain't gonna happen with a 425 behind it.


Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] NEW LISTING! | 1974 ELEGANZA II
Next Topic: You Are Invited: GMC Motorhome Homecoming in Pontiac, Michigan
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 16 08:52:12 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10731 seconds