GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Differences between 403 and 455
Re: [GMCnet] Differences between 403 and 455 [message #279130 is a reply to message #279128] Fri, 05 June 2015 10:58 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
I have a heavy 78 Royale with a 403. One of the first things I did to it
was to change the final drive gear ratio from a 3:07 to a 3:70. Monday on
the way home from a rally in Washington state, we ran into a headwind down
the Columbia Gorge that I estimate was 50 to 70 mph. I could easily run
over 65 miles per hour against that wind, but prudently slowed down to 55
to save fuel. I made up for it on the way south from Portland. I saw 80 on
the speedometer a couple of times. My 403 has over 120,000 miles on the
clock. It runs as well now as it did when I bought it with 80,000 miles. It
will run with the 455 very well, with the exception being at the bottom of
a hill when I let the RPM's fall below 2000. In the 1800 to 2200 rpm range,
the 455 will out torque the 403. But not above 2800 - 4000 rpm. No prudent
person will drive a GMC above 4000 rpms on highways with traffic anyway.
Either way, both engines are reliable as an anvil if you maintain them
well. If I stay out of the 4 barrel, I consistently get over 10 miles per
gallon.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Randy Van Winkle wrote:

> George Beckman wrote on Fri, 05 June 2015 00:27
>> One oddity about the 403 is that it has siamese cylinders, meaning there
> are no water jackets between 2&4, and 6&8. (other side as well)
>> Apparently this is not a problem. I forget the mileage he has on the
> coach... I am guessing 78K or something like that. We could feel no ridge at
>> the top of the cylinders. Cylinders looked perfect.
>>
>> If I ran on to a nice 403, I might just consider swapping. (hate to
> think about finding all the brackets.)
>
>
> What George said! I have a little over 100K miles. It has been a good
> running engine. As George said, we pulled the head last winter because of a
> Tuliped intake valve. The cause is a little uncertain, but I believe it
> was caused by a failed spark plug. It appeared the electrode on the plug
> came loose and welded itself to the ground lug. Replaced valve and all
> seems to be good after around 5,000 miles.
>
> I love the 403 when mated to a 3.70 final drive. I would not let the type
> of engine be a deciding factor in making a coach decision.
> --
> Randy & Margie
> '77 Eleganza II '403'
> Battlefield, MO
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Leaving FMCA Glamarama
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Your thoughts on fuel stabilizers
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 25 09:03:13 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.26480 seconds