GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] engine block ID info
Re: [GMCnet] engine block ID info [message #278373 is a reply to message #278325] Mon, 25 May 2015 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
<rallymaster is currently offline  <rallymaster   United States
Messages: 361
Registered: May 2014
Karma:
Senior Member
The KOBA engine was one that was designed by the team of Arch, Jim Bounds
and a company in Florida (?) Arch wanted an engine with the best possible
low-end torque, and he said he didn't care whether it even ran above 3100
RPM (or thereabouts). Might be some small inaccuracies in the preceding
statement, but that's the gist of the origin.
RonC


On Mon, 25 May 2015 01:04:05 -0500 Bob Dunahugh
writes:
> What's a KOBA 455? I was looking at cam profile's as listed below. I
> think it will work. But I need to check the cam base line of
> rotation as used in the 403. And some other specs.
> Bob Dunahugh78 Royale4 original Yenko'sAnd too many other collector
> car's to be in my right mined.
>
>
>
>
> Mike. From what I found out about 11 years ago. When I went looking
> for a 403 just to have around if I ever needed any parts. The car
> 403 will work in the GMC. I've been looking into the cams that were
> used in the 403, and 455. As covered last week. The Distributor,
> carb, and water pump are different then the car 403. I've always
> been under the impression that the cam was also specific to the GMC.
> So I've been looking into this for both the 403, and 455. It's
> beginning to look like there are 2 cams that may have been used in
> the 455 car engine. That was used in the GMC. It's looking like the
> 1973, 225 HP engine that developed it's peak torque of 360 ft lbs @
> 2600 RPM. Or the other 1973 car 455 cam that was rated at 250 HP,
> with it's peak torque of 375 ft lbs @ 2800 RPM. As for the 403
> cam that came in the the GMC. I believe it's cam came from a 350
> by it's profile. This may have been because of emission standards.
> When ever I have to work on my 78 GMC 403. I'm
> going to be looking into installing the 455 cam as I see it now by
> it's profile. I talked to Dick Paterson on this last Thursday. And
> he is thinking the same thing.
> Bob Dunahugh78 Royale
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>


Ron & Linda Clark
North Plains, ORYGUN
78 Eleganza II

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Retrofit AC control panel from newer GM
Next Topic: engine block ID info
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 25 06:09:02 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.85717 seconds