Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » 1 ton question
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question [message #268117 is a reply to message #268114] |
Tue, 23 December 2014 20:15 |
James Hupy
Messages: 6806 Registered: May 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
A further note on the 1 ton knuckles. The ball joint tapers are all correct
because we are using 1 ton ball joints. Where there has been an occasional
fitment issue has been on the tie rod joints. SOME, BUT NOT ALL, of the
knuckles are thicker in the area where the joint is located, and the GMC
tie rod end threaded portion is quite short. Manny has a workaround for
this. He uses a tapered reamer that is the same as the joint, and just
reams the bore a bit deeper. This allows the joint to seat further up,
giving more access to the threaded portion of the joint. It is a critical
reaming operation, and the stock joints vary a bit. So, the castellated nut
and the drilled cotter pin hole sometimes does not index. In those cases,
I fit a distressed nut. They are still torqued to the same value as the
castellated nut, and because I am a belt and suspenders kind of guy, I use
blue threadlocker as well.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 Gmc Royale 403
On Dec 23, 2014 5:24 PM, "KB" wrote:
> KB wrote on Tue, 23 December 2014 17:14
>> Manny reams the 1ton knuckles so they have the correct taper. He had a
> special reamer tool made just for this.
>> So, if it's a Manny 1-ton kit, the taper shouldn't be an issue.
>>
>> Karen
>> 1975 26
>
>
> I should qualify that: shouldn't be an issue if the reamed depth is
> correct (as per Bill's drawing). If Manny did it, it's likely correct
> since he's done a zillion of them and has a special tool for the job.
> It is my understanding some of the other kits didn't have the knuckles
> reamed, so the taper could be an issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
|
|
1 ton question
By: roy1 on Mon, 22 December 2014 17:28
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: roy1 on Mon, 22 December 2014 19:22
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: bwevers on Mon, 22 December 2014 19:41
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: KB on Tue, 23 December 2014 19:14
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: KB on Tue, 23 December 2014 19:23
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: roy1 on Tue, 23 December 2014 20:34
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: bwevers on Mon, 22 December 2014 19:47
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: RF_Burns on Tue, 23 December 2014 13:15
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: roy1 on Tue, 23 December 2014 16:51
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: JohnL455 on Sat, 27 December 2014 10:23
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: roy1 on Sat, 27 December 2014 16:05
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
By: USAussie on Sat, 27 December 2014 21:51
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: rcjordan on Sun, 28 December 2014 07:52
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
By: Keith V on Sun, 28 December 2014 10:26
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
By: roy1 on Sun, 28 December 2014 13:28
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] 1 ton question
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: bwevers on Sun, 28 December 2014 12:06
|
|
|
Re: 1 ton question
By: JohnL455 on Tue, 30 December 2014 09:49
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon May 13 09:41:05 CDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01412 seconds
|