GMCforum: GMCnet » [GMCnet] Why not

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Why not

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: [GMCnet] Why not [message #100982 is a reply to message #100957]

Sat, 25 September 2010 15:52

Larry C

Messages: 1168
Registered: July 2004
Location: NE Illinois by the Illino...

Karma:

Senior Member

It seems to me that it wouldn't be THAT hard to create a system using the two pumps, four to six solenoids, two relays and MODERN electronics. With better height sensors, you should be able to have manual _plus_ multiple settings (from low to high) highway, town, rough road and max clearance.
____________________________________________________

I agree.
I have a project diagram and wiring for changing over to a solenoid based system with electrical sensors at the rear wheels.
Time prevents be from attacking this one head on just yet and I still need to fine tune the elec sensors to a simple operation. The simpler it is, the less chance of it failing, I think...

I am in full agreement that the nice new OEM systems had to work wonderfully... but with the addition of a dozen or so extra fittings, ( PO ), it gets tougher to find.

But, there is always next year.......................

Gatsbys' CRUISER

08-18-04
74 GLACIER X, 260/455-APC-4 Bagg'r
Remflex Manifold gaskets
CampGrounds needed, Add yours to "PLACES" /> http://www.gmceast.com/travel
_

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[GMCnet] Why not By: Steve Phillips on Sat, 18 September 2010 12:58
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: KRDietz on Sat, 18 September 2010 13:10
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Ken Burton on Sat, 18 September 2010 14:35
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Ray Erspamer on Sat, 18 September 2010 14:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Larry C on Sat, 25 September 2010 06:43
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: jimk on Sat, 25 September 2010 07:56
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: WD0AFQ on Sat, 25 September 2010 08:01
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: James Hupy on Sat, 25 September 2010 10:03
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: mike miller on Sat, 25 September 2010 10:39
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Don A on Sat, 25 September 2010 11:17
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: James Hupy on Sat, 25 September 2010 13:06
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: jaholland on Sat, 25 September 2010 14:24
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: tbpartridge on Sat, 25 September 2010 15:06
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Larry C on Sat, 25 September 2010 15:52
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Keith V on Sat, 25 September 2010 18:05
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Larry C on Sat, 25 September 2010 21:54
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Larry C on Sat, 25 September 2010 15:47
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: James Hupy on Sat, 25 September 2010 16:09
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Larry C on Sat, 25 September 2010 21:32
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: James Hupy on Sat, 25 September 2010 22:05
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: David Greenberg on Sat, 25 September 2010 14:30
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: rgogan on Sun, 17 September 2017 19:12
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Richard Denney on Sun, 17 September 2017 19:20
		Re: [GMCnet] Why not By: Ethan James on Mon, 18 September 2017 16:52

Previous Topic:	[GMCnet] lost gauges
Next Topic:	[GMCnet] rookie errors.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sun May 26 16:50:22 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.36405 seconds