GMCforum: GMCnet » [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs [message #74261 is a reply to message #74259]

Thu, 18 February 2010 15:33

wally

Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska

Karma:

Senior Member

Larry wrote on Thu, 18 February 2010 15:08

The Altitude Compensating carbs work great...UNLESS...you have a Wide band O2 and a FA meter. Now that sounds strange, but the FA tells you what the carb is *really* doing in terms of FA at all speeds,throttle positions and loads. If yo hav ethe O2 meter, I can guarentee, you'r gonna want to change something.

Like Larry I had the wide band installed with the stock Qjet for a year. AFR goes all over the place.

Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Richard Lister on Mon, 08 February 2010 10:01
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Mr ERFisher on Mon, 08 February 2010 10:10
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: GeorgeRud on Mon, 08 February 2010 10:17
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ron on Mon, 08 February 2010 11:08
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Matt Colie on Mon, 08 February 2010 11:14
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Steven Ferguson on Mon, 08 February 2010 12:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: k2gkk on Mon, 08 February 2010 12:35
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Mr ERFisher on Mon, 08 February 2010 12:46
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Steven Ferguson on Mon, 08 February 2010 18:31
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry on Mon, 08 February 2010 22:00
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Steven Ferguson on Tue, 09 February 2010 07:19
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: bill schurman on Mon, 08 February 2010 13:11
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ron on Mon, 08 February 2010 14:31
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ken Burton on Tue, 09 February 2010 02:11
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Tue, 09 February 2010 06:40
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: tgeiger on Tue, 09 February 2010 09:51
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Wed, 10 February 2010 07:57
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Galbavy on Mon, 08 February 2010 15:30
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: USAussie on Mon, 08 February 2010 16:23
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry C on Thu, 18 February 2010 09:06
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Thu, 18 February 2010 11:17
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Gary Worobec on Thu, 18 February 2010 11:33
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Chr$ on Mon, 08 February 2010 16:48
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Chr$ on Mon, 08 February 2010 16:49
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: k2gkk on Mon, 08 February 2010 18:12
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Rick Williams on Mon, 08 February 2010 18:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: David L Greenberg on Mon, 08 February 2010 19:55
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: George Beckman on Mon, 08 February 2010 20:14
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Matt Colie on Tue, 09 February 2010 13:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Richard Lister on Tue, 09 February 2010 14:36
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: George Beckman on Tue, 09 February 2010 20:50
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: GeorgeRud on Tue, 09 February 2010 15:04
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Galbavy on Tue, 09 February 2010 15:54
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Galbavy on Tue, 09 February 2010 17:03
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Wed, 10 February 2010 05:41
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: klassic kampers on Tue, 09 February 2010 17:34
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bob de Kruyff on Tue, 09 February 2010 18:35
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Sandra Price on Wed, 10 February 2010 11:18
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: tgeiger on Wed, 10 February 2010 14:37
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: ljdavick on Wed, 10 February 2010 14:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Sat, 13 February 2010 08:20
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Freeman on Sat, 13 February 2010 09:01
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: emerystora on Sat, 13 February 2010 09:47
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Freeman on Sat, 13 February 2010 15:47
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ron on Sat, 13 February 2010 16:14
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Surbo on Sat, 13 February 2010 17:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ron on Sat, 13 February 2010 17:57
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Freeman on Mon, 15 February 2010 13:33
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: emerystora on Mon, 15 February 2010 13:42
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry on Mon, 15 February 2010 14:40
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: mlincoln on Mon, 15 February 2010 15:31
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Freeman on Tue, 16 February 2010 07:49
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Matt Colie on Wed, 17 February 2010 17:34
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: GMCWiperMan on Wed, 17 February 2010 17:57
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: mlincoln on Wed, 17 February 2010 19:31
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Ken Burton on Wed, 17 February 2010 20:23
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Kosier on Wed, 17 February 2010 21:46
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: mlincoln on Wed, 17 February 2010 22:01
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Kosier on Wed, 17 February 2010 22:34
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: klassic kampers on Thu, 18 February 2010 14:22
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Bounds on Thu, 18 February 2010 09:09
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Matt Colie on Thu, 18 February 2010 07:49
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: mlincoln on Thu, 18 February 2010 08:38
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Kosier on Wed, 17 February 2010 20:57
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Surbo on Mon, 15 February 2010 14:09
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Jim Galbavy on Mon, 15 February 2010 14:38
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Freeman on Tue, 16 February 2010 07:38
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Carleton Douglas[1] on Wed, 10 February 2010 14:53
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: jimk on Wed, 10 February 2010 22:18
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Richard Lister on Tue, 16 February 2010 10:55
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: bryant374 on Tue, 16 February 2010 12:21
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Bill Massey on Tue, 16 February 2010 13:24
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: psakw on Sat, 13 February 2010 21:58
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: emerystora on Sat, 13 February 2010 22:07
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: rallymaster on Thu, 18 February 2010 11:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: g.winger on Thu, 18 February 2010 14:11
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry on Thu, 18 February 2010 15:08
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: wally on Thu, 18 February 2010 15:33
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry on Fri, 19 February 2010 13:44
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: wally on Fri, 19 February 2010 14:44
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Larry on Fri, 19 February 2010 19:05
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: GMCWiperMan on Fri, 19 February 2010 19:23
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: Keith V on Sat, 20 February 2010 10:12
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: GMC_LES on Sat, 20 February 2010 16:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs By: WD0AFQ on Sat, 20 February 2010 17:35

Previous Topic:	[GMCnet] Combination Valve Wire
Next Topic:	[GMCnet] smog/vent?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sun May 12 12:03:39 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00831 seconds