GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs
Re: [GMCnet] Injection versus Carbs [message #74201 is a reply to message #74194] Wed, 17 February 2010 20:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma:
Senior Member
mlincoln wrote on Wed, 17 February 2010 19:31

Has anyone tried a carb (a fixed carb, not an altitude-adjusting one) that has been specifically leaned for altitude? Does it detonate (too lean) at sea level? I'm thinking that one of the experienced tinkerers might know.

In airplane flying in the Rockies one leans to peak rpm (fixed pitch prop), then richens to make the exhaust gas temp 50-100 degrees cooler for takeoff. There's a big difference in power: running full rich (firewalled mixture control) compared to optimally leaned makes a huge difference in a high density-altitude situation. In the Utah mountains I once foolishly filled up a Cessna 152 (a little underpowered straight-tailed 152 from the 1950's) with avgas the night before, and then took off the next day. My friend and I flew the plane in ground effect for three miles to the edge of Bryce Canyon (airport was 9000 MSL), in order to throw ourselves off the edge and get some altitude beneath us. If I hadn't leaned for altitude I'm sure we would never have even gotten into ground effect. (By the time we got to the Grand Canyon 45 min later, I had thermaled to 14,500 feet, and LA Center didn't believe our type aircraft--an 89 hp 152--given our altitude-encoding transponder rea
ding, but that's what rising air will do for you).

Therefore I suspect an optimal air *mass* to fuel mixture might make a significant difference in the GMC too. But, without the manual mixture control, it may be that the altered air/fuel volumetric mixture of the "mountain carb", when running at low altitude with the air mass much greater, would result in a too lean situation, with unacceptable detonation or at least higher cylinder head/EGT and wear in the valve train.

Has anyone tried it?

Mike



I had a similar experience on my way to Alaska coming out of a hot Montana airport fully loaded with fuel, passengers, and camping gear. I could not clear the power lines 2 miles off of the end of the runway. I thought about going under them. Then it occurred to me to just turn left or right and I won't have to go over them. It took quite a while to get up to cruising altitude that day.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Combination Valve Wire
Next Topic: [GMCnet] smog/vent?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 13 15:23:58 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01071 seconds