GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » New airbags
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136564 is a reply to message #136562] Fri, 29 July 2011 11:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dennis S is currently offline  Dennis S   United States
Messages: 3046
Registered: November 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member

Mark or anyone else who may have one,

Do you still have the end of the airbag that held the fill valve? If you have no need, I have a good bag that I keep here for a spare/loaner -- but it is missing the fill valve.

Happy to pay shipping.

Dennis


Dennis Sexton
73 GMC
Germantown, TN 38138-2066
USA



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Grueninger <markgrue@hotmail.com>
To: gmclist <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Fri, Jul 29, 2011 10:54 am
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] New airbags



The shocks are on my TO DO list not at the top but close. I like the quality
f the bilstiens we use on our dirt late model stock car so I will probably go
ith them. Different animal I know but I would think the quality is still
here. I will see. I see Jimk has them so I will more then likely get them
rom him. I intend to get some adjustable links for the rear ride height and
ee what i can do with the front torsion bars to get the ride height in line.
ave 1 more camping trip in august then will start working on it. I think you
re really close with the rear height numbers. Thats about what i figured.
hanks for your input I appreciate it.
Mark

obert Mueller wrote on Fri, 29 July 2011 09:41
Mark,

The ride height for the rear is specified as 11 11/16" +/- 1/4" from the
ground to the top of the oval slot in the frame (MM X-7525 Page 3-34 Fig 70
Checking Vehicle Ride Height.)

From memory: the frame is 6" tall and the slot is about 3/4" "high."

Here's the ride height math for your GMC:

8 3/4" = Ground to bottom of frame
3 " = Distance from bottom of frame to middle of adjustment slot
3/8" = Distance from middle to the top of the slot (3/4" divided by 1/2)
12 1/8 = Ride height

If I've got all my figures right I agree that you're a bit too high. This is
what I thought when I saw in your pictures that the bag mounting flanges on
the bogie arms were not parallel but a bit spread apart at ride height. It
has been noted on the GMCnet that at the correct ride height you can draw a
straight line from the rear wheel spindle center to middle wheel spindle
center, it will intersect the center of the bogie pins; and the bag mounting
flanges will be parallel.

You note below that you need to drop your ride height by about 3/4" that
would result in a ride height setting of about 11 5/8" which is within spec.
BTW having the rear a bit low will increase caster (marginally) and improve
handling.

On to the shock absorbers; I suspect that the shocks you have on the rear of
your GMC are for a car or truck and not a GMC.

I reviewed the presentation that Manny Trovao made at the first GMC
Convention I attended (Santa Rosa 2008) and noted the following:

Quote:
Shock absorbers work on the principle of fluid displacement on both the
compression and extension cycle. A typical car or light truck will have more
resistance during its extension cycle then its compression cycle. The
compression cycle controls the motion of a vehicle's unsprung weight, while
extension controls the heavier sprung weight.

On our motorhomes, the front shock has more resistance on the compression
cycle than on the extension cycle. On the rear, it's the opposite, it has
more resistance on the extension cycle than on the compression cycle.
Unquote

A bit further along in the presentation he has photos of shocks that have
been cutaway to show their innards. They are AC-Delco, Caspro, KYB, and
Bilstein.

Under the picture of the AC-Delco shock he states:

Quote
This is the original AC/Delco that came with the Motorhome. It's a twin tube
design. Inner tube chamber. It is no longer made
Unquote

If you are a member of GMCMI you can click on the link below; log in and
review the whole presentation:

http://www.gmcmi.com/mem-bers/TechHandouts/GMC_Shocks.pdf

I have only been a GMC owner and GMCnet member for four years and to date I
have never heard anyone note that they had "new looking" AC-Delco shocks on
their GMC. AFAIK the only shocks currently available for the GMC are made by
KYB or Bilstein.

In discovered all of this because when I drove The Blue Streak from Mudgee
(country NSW) back to Sydney and it was all over the road. During my
research on how to fix it I discovered there was a bunch of stuff wrong with
the front end and on the rear end the shocks that a PO had installed were
from a car.

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426


GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

-
ark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach
almeyer IL
______________________________________________
MCnet mailing list
nsubscribe or Change List Options:
ttp://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Dennis S
73 Painted Desert 230
Memphis TN Metro
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136585 is a reply to message #136562] Fri, 29 July 2011 12:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
mgrue wrote on Fri, 29 July 2011 11:54

The shocks are on my TO DO list not at the top but close. I like the quality of the bilstiens we use on our dirt late model stock car so I will probably go with them. Different animal I know but I would think the quality is still there. I will see. I see Jimk has them so I will more then likely get them from him. I intend to get some adjustable links for the rear ride height and see what i can do with the front torsion bars to get the ride height in line. have 1 more camping trip in august then will start working on it. I think you are really close with the rear height numbers. Thats about what i figured. Thanks for your input I appreciate it.

Mark

Mark,

I too was once a Bilstien brother.. (Now referred to as bilgetein.) Not only have they gotten really nasty and hard to deal with at warranty time, but the warranties seem to be very common for GMC. Before you buy, talk to JimK about this.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136587 is a reply to message #136550] Fri, 29 July 2011 12:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
fred v is currently offline  fred v   United States
Messages: 999
Registered: April 2006
Location: pensacola, fl.
Karma: 0
Senior Member
[quote Rob Mueller wrote:

I reviewed the presentation that Manny Trovao made at the first GMC
Convention I attended (Santa Rosa 2008) and noted the following:

Quote:
Shock absorbers work on the principle of fluid displacement on both the
compression and extension cycle. A typical car or light truck will have more
resistance during its extension cycle then its compression cycle. The
compression cycle controls the motion of a vehicle's unsprung weight, while
extension controls the heavier sprung weight.

On our motorhomes, the front shock has more resistance on the compression
cycle than on the extension cycle. On the rear, it's the opposite, it has
more resistance on the extension cycle than on the compression cycle.
Unquote
[/quote]
isn't the "typical car or light truck" statement backwards. all cars resist compression more and extension less so the wheel will drop quicker to recontact the road. the motorhome statement is correct.
hope i didn't get this backwards myself.


Fred V
'77 Royale RB 455
P'cola, Fl
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136629 is a reply to message #136585] Fri, 29 July 2011 20:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Matt,

Jawohl!

I zink zat is beecaus zeh not making zem in Deutchland not no more!

I zink zey are beink made in Khina!

Und ve all know vat zat means!

Regards,
Rob "ze USAussie Kraut" M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426


-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Colie

Mark,

I too was once a Bilstien brother.. (Now referred to as bilgetein.) Not
only have they gotten really nasty and hard to deal with at warranty time,
but the warranties seem to be very common for GMC. Before you buy, talk to
JimK about this.

Matt


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136630 is a reply to message #136587] Fri, 29 July 2011 20:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Fred,

I agree you have to REALLY think about this a lot!

When you hit a bump the shock absorber allows the spring to compress rapidly
so the front end doesn't jump upwards. It then controls the rate it expands
back to "normal" height.

To test a shock you push down on the fender and then see how quickly it
comes back up. If it comes up rapidly the shock is shot.

The fact that the rear shocks on a GMC work opposite REALLY confuses the
issue. Whenever I try to figger out anything about the rear suspension I
load in this picture from JimK's website and picture the bogies going up and
down.

http://www.appliedgmc.com/products/full/684.jpg

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426


-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of fred veenschoten
Sent: Saturday, 30 July 2011 3:39 AM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] New airbags

isn't the "typical car or light truck" statement backwards. all cars resist
compression more and extension less so the wheel will drop quicker to
recontact the road. the motorhome statement is correct.
hope i didn't get this backwards myself.

--
Fred V


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #136653 is a reply to message #136629] Fri, 29 July 2011 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Byron Songer is currently offline  Byron Songer   United States
Messages: 1912
Registered: August 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Karma: -2
Senior Member

Rob,

How many brain cells did you loose on that one?

Ve haups yüse gout zom leff.

Byron

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Mueller <robmueller@iinet.net.au>
Reply-To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:14:16 +1000
To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] New airbags

>Matt,
>
>Jawohl!
>
>I zink zat is beecaus zeh not making zem in Deutchland not no more!
>
>I zink zey are beink made in Khina!
>
>Und ve all know vat zat means!
>
>Regards,
>Rob "ze USAussie Kraut" M.
>Sydney, Australia
>AUS '75 Avion-The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
>USA '75 Avion-Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matt Colie
>
>Mark,
>
>I too was once a Bilstien brother.. (Now referred to as bilgetein.) Not
>only have they gotten really nasty and hard to deal with at warranty time,
>but the warranties seem to be very common for GMC. Before you buy, talk
>to
>JimK about this.
>
>Matt
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>GMCnet mailing list
>Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



-- Byron Songer
Full-timing to enjoy the USA
Former owner but still an admirer
GMC paint schemes at -
http://www.songerconsulting.net
Re: New airbags [message #136662 is a reply to message #136547] Sat, 30 July 2011 01:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mike miller   United States
Messages: 3576
Registered: February 2004
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
Senior Member
lilmyk wrote on Fri, 29 July 2011 07:34

One option for eliminating the possibility of over extending the shocks is to use "shock straps" ...
...
Hopefully, the internal bump stop of the airbag and the brackets will eliminate the shocks from being over compressed. ...


The shocks work backwards to what you are saying...

The internal bump stop in the bag should protect the shock from over extension. (ie: straps would not help.)

GMC rear shocks get damaged by to much COMPRESSION, normally from jacking without letting the air pressure out of the bag. It causes the seals to leak oil. The Bilstein shocks on my '78 seem to be more susceptible to this problem than the KYB's on my other two coaches.


Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo' http://m000035.blogspot.com
Re: New airbags [message #136986 is a reply to message #136214] Mon, 01 August 2011 02:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
spiffycar is currently offline  spiffycar   United States
Messages: 133
Registered: May 2010
Location: Brook Park ,Ohio
Karma: 1
Senior Member
mgrue wrote on Wed, 27 July 2011 07:08

I finished installing my new airbags and I am very satisfied with the results. They are 9.2 inches in diameter so use about half the pressure of the originals. Ride is about the same but the compressor is not working nearly as hard to produce 60 psi instead of 125. They have enough travel to raise and lower the coach to the limits of the shock travel. Let me know what you think.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=39889&nocache=1

Mark


Nice job! Its always good to see people trying new ideas.

Just a thought to add to it.....

I would consider setting the cutoff for the compressor at around 85-90psi and installing a regulator on the tank output to the power level valves. That way you would have some reserve to fill those big bags if you need to raise the coach in a hurry. You can then also add a valve with an unregulated output for an air-hose for filling your tires as well.


Paul W L
76 Daytona Beach! ( EX-Palm Beach )
Cleveland,OH
& Current Card Carrying Pull A Part VIP Member
Re: New airbags [message #137858 is a reply to message #136214] Sun, 07 August 2011 10:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I hope I am not boring anyone but several people had asked about the ride with the new airbags. I took it to Rend Lake this weekend and it seems to handle much better then with the OEM system. It seems, and this is just my biased opinion, that it tends to roll a lot less in the corners. I felt much more confident that it would not push out like it did before. I think the larger area of the bags helped in this, but again this is just a subjective opinion and it is worth just what you paid for it. Smile

Mark


Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: New airbags [message #137863 is a reply to message #136986] Sun, 07 August 2011 10:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
C Boyd is currently offline  C Boyd   United States
Messages: 2629
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 18
Senior Member

Mark[/quote]

Nice job! Its always good to see people trying new ideas.

Just a thought to add to it.....

I would consider setting the cutoff for the compressor at around 85-90psi and installing a regulator on the tank output to the power level valves. That way you would have some reserve to fill those big bags if you need to raise the coach in a hurry. You can then also add a valve with an unregulated output for an air-hose for filling your tires as well.
[/quote]




Sir: the only way to raise the coach faster is with more air volume to the bag, ie larger storage tank and supply line. The level control valve controls the air pressure in the bag. If it takes 80lb to get level it cuts the air off at level so there is only 80lb in the bag even if there is 125 in the storage tank.


C. Boyd
76 Crestmont
East Tennessee
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138399 is a reply to message #136474] Thu, 11 August 2011 04:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Donovan-formerly Jase386 is currently offline  Donovan-formerly Jase386   United States
Messages: 139
Registered: January 2009
Location: Greenville SC
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On the shorter bags like this thread is about and the ones southland is selling you cant store the Coach deflated. There isnt enough clearance between the 'back' of the blind screw and the piston. you have a tiny point the size of a pencil eraser supporting half the coach and pinches the airbag. Ask Zeb or I how we know....

Donovan, Greenville SC 1975 Eleganza II 81,500 miles
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138401 is a reply to message #138399] Thu, 11 August 2011 05:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
The Firestone W01-358-9294 airbags that I used have an internal bumpstop that prevents the problem you mentioned. That is one of the main reasons besides the travel that I choose them.

Mark

Donovan-formerly Jase386 wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 04:53

On the shorter bags like this thread is about and the ones southland is selling you cant store the Coach deflated. There isnt enough clearance between the 'back' of the blind screw and the piston. you have a tiny point the size of a pencil eraser supporting half the coach and pinches the airbag. Ask Zeb or I how we know....



Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138798 is a reply to message #136250] Fri, 12 August 2011 23:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Ken Henderson wrote on Wed, 27 July 2011 08:01

Mark,

Looks like a great mod. Have enough road time with it enough to
comment on the change in ride/stability characteristics? I'd expect
more "floating" and rolling with so much lower pressure. That might
create more need for rear sway bars, which I don't like with the OEM
bags because of the leveling problems the heavy ones create.

Ken H.


On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Mark Grueninger wrote:
>
>
> I finished installing my new airbags and I am very satisfied with the results.   They are 9.2 inches in diameter so use about half the pressure of the originals.  Ride is about the same but the compressor is not working nearly as hard to produce 60 psi instead of 125.  They have enough travel to raise and lower the coach to the limits of the shock travel.   Let me know what you think.
>
>  http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=39889&nocache=1
>
> Mark
> -
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138804 is a reply to message #138798] Sat, 13 August 2011 00:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Well, yeah, that does make sense:

X psi * Y sq.in = Y psi * X sq.in. = Z lbf

Ken H.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Bob de Kruyff <NEXT2POOL@aol.com> wrote:

>
>
> Ken Henderson wrote on Wed, 27 July 2011 08:01
> > Mark,
> >
> > Looks like a great mod. Have enough road time with it enough to
> > comment on the change in ride/stability characteristics? I'd expect
> > more "floating" and rolling with so much lower pressure. That
>


> Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should
> not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no
> matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag
> is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,
> --
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: New airbags [message #138831 is a reply to message #136214] Sat, 13 August 2011 08:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Michael Morton is currently offline  Michael Morton   United States
Messages: 21
Registered: July 2004
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Mark,
Let's make a deal, if you will post a drawing with dimensions of the airbag mounts that you made, I will send you a T-skirt to replace the one that was damaged. Nothing fancy, a rough drawing will do, I think many of us will be interested.

Mike Morton
1975 Eleganza II (Sloopy)
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138849 is a reply to message #138798] Sat, 13 August 2011 09:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
winter is currently offline  winter   United States
Messages: 247
Registered: September 2007
Location: MPLS MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member


[/quote]
Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,[/quote]


That may be true in a static condition, but the spring rate of the bags could be different. A higher spring rate could make the coach feel more stable


Jerrod Winter
1977 Palm Beach
Green Jelly Bean
Twin Cities, Minnesota
Re: New airbags [message #138880 is a reply to message #138831] Sat, 13 August 2011 12:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Give me a bit on the drawing. I have been going camping quite a bit and am reluctant to disassemble the bags to make drawings. Should be able to get to it in the next few weeks.

Mark

Michael Morton wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 08:37

Mark,
Let's make a deal, if you will post a drawing with dimensions of the airbag mounts that you made, I will send you a T-skirt to replace the one that was damaged. Nothing fancy, a rough drawing will do, I think many of us will be interested.

Mike Morton
1975 Eleganza II (Sloopy)



Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #138910 is a reply to message #138849] Sat, 13 August 2011 16:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
winter wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 10:49

Quote:


Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,
That may be true in a static condition, but the spring rate of the bags could be different. A higher spring rate could make the coach feel more stable

Jerrod,

While your concern about spring rate is valid, I will submit that the design with a rolling piston even if only at one end has got to be closer to the OE spring rate than any with the squashed balloon types that are most often used. (Change in volume per unit travel is very different between the two designs.) This type is one rolling piston, at about half the pressure for the same force. My person grab and go engineering judgment would say it has to be about as close as we can get with any off-the-shelf parts available. The fact that it retains the capability to "walk over" variations in road surface is, I believe, going to be one of its biggest assets.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #139094 is a reply to message #138910] Sun, 14 August 2011 14:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
winter is currently offline  winter   United States
Messages: 247
Registered: September 2007
Location: MPLS MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
mcolie wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 16:32

winter wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 10:49

Quote:


Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,
That may be true in a static condition, but the spring rate of the bags could be different. A higher spring rate could make the coach feel more stable

Jerrod,

While your concern about spring rate is valid, I will submit that the design with a rolling piston even if only at one end has got to be closer to the OE spring rate than any with the squashed balloon types that are most often used. (Change in volume per unit travel is very different between the two designs.) This type is one rolling piston, at about half the pressure for the same force. My person grab and go engineering judgment would say it has to be about as close as we can get with any off-the-shelf parts available. The fact that it retains the capability to "walk over" variations in road surface is, I believe, going to be one of its biggest assets.

Matt


I'm in agreement on keeping the system simple and retaining its original function with off the shelf parts. The bottom stops are also a very nice addition to the GM design.

I often wondered if a higher spring rate, or a non linear rate, would yield a more stable ride with less porposing (if thats a word). I would imagine that most of the comfort of the GM design lays in a small amount of deflection of the bags. It would be interesting to measure the bag length while driving down the road.


Jerrod Winter
1977 Palm Beach
Green Jelly Bean
Twin Cities, Minnesota
Re: [GMCnet] New airbags [message #139172 is a reply to message #139094] Sun, 14 August 2011 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
winter wrote on Sun, 14 August 2011 15:02

mcolie wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 16:32

winter wrote on Sat, 13 August 2011 10:49

Quote:


Ken, unless the geometry of the suspension is changed, the ride rate should not change--it takes so much force to get the coach to the correct trim no matter what combination of area or pressure you use--again, assuming the bag is in the same place with the same lever arm relationship,
That may be true in a static condition, but the spring rate of the bags could be different. A higher spring rate could make the coach feel more stable
Jerrod,

While your concern about spring rate is valid, I will submit that the design with a rolling piston even if only at one end has got to be closer to the OE spring rate than any with the squashed balloon types that are most often used. (Change in volume per unit travel is very different between the two designs.) This type is one rolling piston, at about half the pressure for the same force. My person grab and go engineering judgment would say it has to be about as close as we can get with any off-the-shelf parts available. The fact that it retains the capability to "walk over" variations in road surface is, I believe, going to be one of its biggest assets.

Matt
I'm in agreement on keeping the system simple and retaining its original function with off the shelf parts. The bottom stops are also a very nice addition to the GM design.

I often wondered if a higher spring rate, or a non linear rate, would yield a more stable ride with less porposing (if thats a word). I would imagine that most of the comfort of the GM design lays in a small amount of deflection of the bags. It would be interesting to measure the bag length while driving down the road.
Jerrod,
You are close, the spelling is porpoising.
You also seem to be stuck with a misconception. The smoothness of the ride is largely a result of a low spring rate coupled with very large suspension travel. If you are having porpoising issues, then you shock absorbers (which really are not, they are supposed to be motion dampers) and not doing their part.
In Short - The wheels can move a lot without the body moving very much.
While this makes a smooth ride, it unfortunately allows a lot of body roll (people call it sway, but it is not - sway is another axis). The four bag systems have a higher spring rate and less travel which leads some people to like the handling better. That is a matter of preference.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Previous Topic: Spotted GMC in Walkerton
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Engine Serial Number
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 21 12:20:58 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 3.62895 seconds