GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Transporting LP Gas
Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155305 is a reply to message #155299] Tue, 03 January 2012 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
Hmmm... no CNG cars, eh?

Why don't they just ban flammable liquids?


On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Rob Mueller wrote:

> Rick,
>
> Man you're like a dog with a bone ain't cha!
>
> Let's review the situation again:
>
> JP turns up at the Holland Tunnel and is NOT allowed to drive his GMC through the tunnel because it has LPG on board.
>
> I do the research below and spot the bit about the MOT which contradicts what happened to JP so I call the Holland Tunnel Authority
> who inform me RV's with LPG are not allowed in the tunnel
>
> I just called the Holland Tunnel AGAIN on 201-360-5000 and spoke to Nick who advised "NO Flammable gasses of any kind are allowed in
> the tunnel."
>
> With all due respect why don't YOU call and see what they say!
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Michelhaugh
>
>
> Unless the PORT AUTH specifically prohibits LPG somewhere that we have not found, YES, a 20# propane cylinder would meet the
> Material of Trade exception.
>
> Rick M.
>
> Robert Mueller wrote on Tue, 03 January 2012 10:03
>> Rick,
>>
>> Click on Red Book and scroll until you come to page 13 where you will find:
>>
>> Class 2, Division 2.1 Placard
>> Flammable Gases
>>
>> PROHIBITED *
>> ANY QUANTITY
>> Holland Tunnel
>> Lincoln Tunnel
>> George Washington Bridge (Lower Level)
>>
>> You will also find:
>>
>> *Materials of Trade in
>> this Division are allowed.
>> See the definition of
>> Materials of Trade for
>> the quantity limitations.
>>
>> I scrolled to page 33 and found:
>>
>> MATERIALS OF TRADE (MOTs) shall mean hazardous materials transported in
>> small quantities as part of a business and subject to less regulation under Code of
>> Federal Regulations (CFR) 173.6 because of their lesser hazards.
>> MATERIALS OF TRADE QUANTITY LIMITS:
>>
>> Division 2.1 or 2.2
>> DOES A CAMPER/RV MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR M.O.T
>> . Not over 100 kg (220 pounds) in a cylinder, or
>> . Not more than 70 gallon water capacity for a non-liquefied Division 2.2 material
>> with no subsidiary hazard in a permanently mounted tank manufactured to the
>> ASME Code.
>>
>> This says RV's with LPG tanks are OK which contradicted what JP Winger had told us so I called:
>>
>> Holland Tunnel
>> Administration Building
>> 13th and Provost Streets
>> Jersey City, New Jersey 07310
>> Communications Center Telephone
>> New Jersey (201) 360-5000
>> New York (212) 435-7000
>>
>> I was informed that LPG IS NOT ALLOWED in the Holland Tunnel, Lincoln Tunnel, or the lower level of the George Washington Bridge.
>>
>> I then went to the home page and scrolled down to the bottom of the page where I found a link to "Contact Us." I clicked on that
>> link which took me to a form where I noted that the Red Book revised March 2009 was incorrect. I received an automated reply
> noting
>> that my message had been received and I would receive a response shortly. That was two weeks ago.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rob M.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Michelhaugh
>>
>>
>> Here is the website I saw:
>> http://www.panynj.gov/bridges-tunnels/holland-tunnel-traffic-restrictions.html
>>
>> I didn't see anything about RVs here.
>>
>> Rick M.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
>
> --
> 1974 26' Canyonlands
> aka "The General"
> Clinton, TN
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155306 is a reply to message #155305] Tue, 03 January 2012 20:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Greg and April is currently offline  Greg and April   United States
Messages: 263
Registered: December 2011
Karma: 0
Senior Member
That's what I'm wondering - in it's own way gasoline is every bit as
dangerous as propane - perhaps more so because it's so common in vehicals.
.

Greg H.

Yeah, I'm odd that way.

.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dolph Santorine" <dolph@dolphsantorine.com>
To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 18:52
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas


> Hmmm... no CNG cars, eh?
>
> Why don't they just ban flammable liquids?
>
>

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155307 is a reply to message #155306] Tue, 03 January 2012 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Greg,

No need to wonder, call Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) on 201-360-5000 and ask them.

Nick seemed to be a nice guy hopefully he will explain it to you.

Please let us know what they say.

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Greg and April

That's what I'm wondering - in it's own way gasoline is every bit as
dangerous as propane - perhaps more so because it's so common in vehicals.
.
Greg H.

Yeah, I'm odd that way.

.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dolph Santorine" <dolph@dolphsantorine.com>

> Hmmm... no CNG cars, eh?
>
> Why don't they just ban flammable liquids?
>
>

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155310 is a reply to message #155198] Tue, 03 January 2012 20:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Would the requirement that the "hazardous material transported in small quantity as part of a business" disqualify an RV? It seems that stipulation would apply to something such as a hot dog cart where the propane is required to conduct business rather then simply as a convienence to the operator of a recreational vehicle. Of course I could be wrong.....

Mark



Robert Mueller wrote on Tue, 03 January 2012 09:03

Rick,

Click on Red Book and scroll until you come to page 13 where you will find:

Class 2, Division 2.1 Placard
Flammable Gases

PROHIBITED *
ANY QUANTITY
Holland Tunnel
Lincoln Tunnel
George Washington Bridge (Lower Level)

You will also find:

*Materials of Trade in
this Division are allowed.
See the definition of
Materials of Trade for
the quantity limitations.

I scrolled to page 33 and found:

MATERIALS OF TRADE (MOTs) shall mean hazardous materials transported in
small quantities as part of a business and subject to less regulation under Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 173.6 because of their lesser hazards.
MATERIALS OF TRADE QUANTITY LIMITS:

Division 2.1 or 2.2
DOES A CAMPER/RV MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR M.O.T
. Not over 100 kg (220 pounds) in a cylinder, or
. Not more than 70 gallon water capacity for a non-liquefied Division 2.2 material
with no subsidiary hazard in a permanently mounted tank manufactured to the
ASME Code.

This says RV's with LPG tanks are OK which contradicted what JP Winger had told us so I called:

Holland Tunnel
Administration Building
13th and Provost Streets
Jersey City, New Jersey 07310
Communications Center Telephone
New Jersey (201) 360-5000
New York (212) 435-7000

I was informed that LPG IS NOT ALLOWED in the Holland Tunnel, Lincoln Tunnel, or the lower level of the George Washington Bridge.

I then went to the home page and scrolled down to the bottom of the page where I found a link to "Contact Us." I clicked on that
link which took me to a form where I noted that the Red Book revised March 2009 was incorrect. I received an automated reply noting
that my message had been received and I would receive a response shortly. That was two weeks ago.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Michelhaugh


Here is the website I saw:
http://www.panynj.gov/bridges-tunnels/holland-tunnel-traffic-restrictions.html

I didn't see anything about RVs here.

Rick M.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist





Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155311 is a reply to message #155306] Tue, 03 January 2012 20:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
How many people arguing about this will ever take their GMC though the Holland tunnel???

Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155317 is a reply to message #155311] Tue, 03 January 2012 22:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Douglas Norton is currently offline  Douglas Norton   United States
Messages: 191
Registered: April 2008
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Count me as one for the Holland tunnel - I did it in 1997.  Traffic was so heavy and "She" would not let me take my eyes off the tall trucks on all four sides of the coach so I did not notice the all the warning signs.  Also, most of the LP I carry is "LIQUID Petroleum". A a portion of the gasoline I carry is a flammable gas; the remainder is liquid petroleum.  Some of that gas is above the gasoline in in my tanks and some is in my intake manifold.  In the gas tank or the LP tank a part of the volume is a flammable gas and the rest is liquid petroleum, just like the fuel in most of the automobiles on the road.  That is my excuse and I will stick to it the next time I travel the Holland tunnel if I am stopped. 



________________________________
From: Bob de Kruyff <NEXT2POOL@AOL.COM>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas



How many people arguing about this will ever take their GMC though the Holland tunnel???
--
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas [message #155319 is a reply to message #155311] Tue, 03 January 2012 22:51 Go to previous message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Bob,

I admit that I'm a pedantic bastard that's for sure! ;-)

I was raised in Hoboken, NJ and have been back "home" once with the GMC already. During that visit I contemplated taking the GMC to
visit a cousin that lives in NYC. We decided against it and stayed at the Liberty Harbor RV Park.

http://www.libertyharborrv.com/directions

You'll have to arrow up to see the route noted below. We came down the Lincoln Highway and then onto (139) to where we turned right
onto Marin Blvd. At the corner of 139 and Marin you are within a stones throw of the entrance / toll gates for the Holland Tunnel.

We arrived at rush hour and the traffic was a MADHOUSE I was happy that we weren't heading to New York!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HollandTunnelJerseyCity.jpg

When JP reported that he was not allowed to go through the tunnel I wondered how much of a hassle it would have been if we had tried
to use the tunnel based on the information published in the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Red Book only to be refused
entry and turned around.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Bob de Kruyff
Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2012 1:49 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Transporting LP Gas



How many people arguing about this will ever take their GMC though the Holland tunnel???
--
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Gauge Envy
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] bed in cockpit
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 23:46:35 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00946 seconds