GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Engine lubrication
Engine lubrication [message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 05:35 Go to next message
tgeiger is currently offline  tgeiger   United States
Messages: 518
Registered: February 2006
Location: kansas city
Karma: -1
Senior Member
So was watching a episode of “Roadkill” and they had purchased a old mazda pickup truck with a 455 in the bed of the truck. If you’ve ever watch the show, these Frankenstein vehicles are the basis of show. Anyhow one of the host commented that he was not excited about the 455, said it was one of the worst engines. Called it a boat anchor. I did some research and found some criticism on the way it leaves the bottom end of the engine dry of oil when run at high rpm for duration of time. What do you guys do to help manage this?

Thanks,
TG


Tom Geiger 76 Eleganza II KCMO
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355627 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 06:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
94nubble is currently offline  94nubble   United States
Messages: 275
Registered: July 2011
Location: Chesapeake VA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
The 455 was used in a lot of Jet Boat applications. A trick the boat guys came up with was to tap into the oil return on the side of the heads and run a direct line down to the oil pan.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/member-galleries/p67346-jet-boat-455.html


Tom McManus
1977 Royale
Chesapeake VA

[Updated on: Sat, 13 June 2020 07:23]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355628 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powwerjon is currently offline  powwerjon   United States
Messages: 849
Registered: March 2013
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Tom,

First of all these guys on these show have no respect for equipment. They probably buzz the 455 in the truck at a high rpm as a guess 4500 +rpm and beat the crap out of it (tech term). Some 455 have be built for racing and that does require special prep on the bottom end and oil system. Oil weight also makes a difference as I have alway run a 15/50 or 20/50 oil over the years starting with dino oil and then as semi synthetic and then a full synthetic in the last few years. Remember that the 455 was originally spec’ed to use a 10/30 or straight 30 weight oil.

The motor in the GMC motorhome depending on the final drive, tire size and speed never goes over 3000 or so RPM for any extended period of time. Typically if you have a 3.07 gear you’re only running 2350 rpm at 70 ish mph. The 3.55 gear runs 2650+/- at 64/65 mph and 3.66 ratio is typically about 2875 +/- at 63/64 mph. I have had experience in all three ratios. I have run all day long with the 3.66 final at 3000 rpm when I needed to make miles for years and have never had an engine issue and or had oil pressure fluctuations ever in the 20+ years and all my engines weather a 403 or 455/461. My oil pressure has run in the motors that I have use has been right at 50 psi at speed. The 455 was used for years to power big irrigation pumps for hours and hours.

J.R. Wright
GMC Great Laker MHC
GMCGL Tech Editor
GMC Eastern States Charter Member
GMCMI
78 GMC Buskirk 29.5’ Stretch
75 GMC Avion (Under Reconstruction)
Michigan



> On Jun 13, 2020, at 6:35 AM, tom geiger via Gmclist wrote:
>
> So was watching a episode of “Roadkill” and they had purchased a old mazda pickup truck with a 455 in the bed of the truck. If you’ve ever watch
> the show, these Frankenstein vehicles are the basis of show. Anyhow one of the host commented that he was not excited about the 455, said it was one
> of the worst engines. Called it a boat anchor. I did some research and found some criticism on the way it leaves the bottom end of the engine dry of
> oil when run at high rpm for duration of time. What do you guys do to help manage this?
>
> Thanks,
> TG
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355631 is a reply to message #355628] Sat, 13 June 2020 07:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
94nubble is currently offline  94nubble   United States
Messages: 275
Registered: July 2011
Location: Chesapeake VA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
I was just replying to the question. A 455 can't return oil over 4500rpm for any extended length of time without it pooling in the heads. The return line was the trick to getting oil back to the pan. My first experience with a 455 was in a Marlin jet boat I renovated many years ago. I ran it at 4800 for lengthy periods with out oil pressure loss. Scary thing. 85mph at 4800. I could shoot a rooster tail 80ft in the air.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/member-galleries/p67346-jet-boat-455.html


Tom McManus
1977 Royale
Chesapeake VA
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355632 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 07:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
The jet boats (Buelher TurboCraft??) at high revs sustained, and they seemed to survive it. And, pumps and boats are analogous to aviation engines in this regard, as opposed to ground vehicle service. Constant speed and load,versus variations in both on the road.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355633 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 07:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tgeiger is currently offline  tgeiger   United States
Messages: 518
Registered: February 2006
Location: kansas city
Karma: -1
Senior Member
Yep understand. He was a younger guy and may not understood how tough those engines were built back then. Good to know it will be fine. Just getting it over to my house to do some projects on it and one of the first items is change the oil.

Tom Geiger 76 Eleganza II KCMO
Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355634 is a reply to message #355633] Sat, 13 June 2020 08:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Tom, just keep the revs under 5500, and you should be just fine. Let's see?
5500 rpm with 3:07 final drive and stock sized tire circumference, pencils
out to not quite 120 mph. Good luck getting her home!
(VERY BIG GRIN)
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 5:56 AM tom geiger via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Yep understand. He was a younger guy and may not understood how tough
> those engines were built back then. Good to know it will be fine. Just
> getting
> it over to my house to do some projects on it and one of the first items
> is change the oil.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355635 is a reply to message #355634] Sat, 13 June 2020 09:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
These engines were not designed for constant Hi revs .
People in the know made sure the return of the oil from the head drained
down easily and also restricted the amount of oil at the push rods.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:45 AM James Hupy via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Tom, just keep the revs under 5500, and you should be just fine. Let's see?
> 5500 rpm with 3:07 final drive and stock sized tire circumference, pencils
> out to not quite 120 mph. Good luck getting her home!
> (VERY BIG GRIN)
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Oregon
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 5:56 AM tom geiger via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
>
>> Yep understand. He was a younger guy and may not understood how tough
>> those engines were built back then. Good to know it will be fine. Just
>> getting
>> it over to my house to do some projects on it and one of the first items
>> is change the oil.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.gmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355638 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 12:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
J.R. If GM says 10W-30 then what is your logic that 20W-50 is “better”? Seems it would exasperate the gravity drain back issues. Most builders today don’t like heavy oils as they pull less heat from bearings and heat kills soft bearings

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II

[Updated on: Sat, 13 June 2020 12:03]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355639 is a reply to message #355638] Sat, 13 June 2020 12:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
For the application of the slow engine speed ranges that our coaches
operate in, 1800 - 3200 rpm. 20w - 50 is a good call. Need a bit higher
viscosity because of high bearing loads, and large throttle openings at
relatively low rpms. Lots of heat in those piston crowns.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 10:03 AM John R. Lebetski via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> J.R. If GM says 10W-30 then what is your logic that 20W-50 is “better”?
> Seems it would exasperate the gravity drain back issues. Most builders
> today don’t like heavy oils as they pull less heat from gearings and heat
> kills soft bearings
> --
> John Lebetski
> Woodstock, IL
> 77 Eleganza II
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355640 is a reply to message #355639] Sat, 13 June 2020 12:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
WE know this, the synthetic oils are considerably better than the
conventional.
Yes, it can leak more, but your getting more protection and dirtying your
drive way.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:10 AM James Hupy via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> For the application of the slow engine speed ranges that our coaches
> operate in, 1800 - 3200 rpm. 20w - 50 is a good call. Need a bit higher
> viscosity because of high bearing loads, and large throttle openings at
> relatively low rpms. Lots of heat in those piston crowns.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Oregon
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 10:03 AM John R. Lebetski via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
>
>> J.R. If GM says 10W-30 then what is your logic that 20W-50 is “better”?
>> Seems it would exasperate the gravity drain back issues. Most builders
>> today don’t like heavy oils as they pull less heat from gearings and heat
>> kills soft bearings
>> --
>> John Lebetski
>> Woodstock, IL
>> 77 Eleganza II
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.gmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355646 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 18:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tgeiger is currently offline  tgeiger   United States
Messages: 518
Registered: February 2006
Location: kansas city
Karma: -1
Senior Member
Ok, sounds like I want to go get some synthetic for the oil change.

Thanks all,
TG


Tom Geiger 76 Eleganza II KCMO
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355647 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 18:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
James Hupy I disagree. Viscosity is the resistance to flow. With high heat loads you want lower viscosity oil as more flow over the bearings transfers more heat then on to remove it at the oil cooler. Viscosity and film strength are not the same thing.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355649 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 13 June 2020 19:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Larry is currently offline  Larry   United States
Messages: 2875
Registered: January 2004
Location: Menomonie, WI
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Here is an article entitled "Motor Oil Engineering Test Data".

https://540ratblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/motor-oil-wear-test-ranking/

It is a long read with lots of repetition. Tests were run on 239 different oils or oils with after market additives. Oils are ranked by their ability to resist wear. An interesting read as most of the higher ranked oils are of relatively low viscosity. 5w30's, 0w20's etc. Here is a copy/paste of a section written about viscosity.


SECTION 2 – MOTOR OIL VISCOSITY SELECTION

THE BENEFITS OF USING THlINNER OIL:

• Thinner oil flows quicker at cold start-up to begin lubricating critical engine components much more quickly than thicker oil can. Most engine wear takes place during cold start-up before oil flow can reach all the components (the longer an engine has been sitting, the more of a concern this becomes), and during warm-up while the oil is still thicker and not flowing as freely as it does during normal hot operating temperature. So, quicker flowing thinner oil will help reduce start-up and warm-up engine wear, which is actually reducing wear overall.

• The more free flowing thinner oil during cold start-up and warm-up, is also much less likely to cause the oil filter bypass to open up, compared to thicker oil. Of course if the bypass opened up, that would allow unfiltered oil to be pumped through the engine. The colder the ambient temperature, and the more rpm used when the engine is cold, the more important this becomes.

• Thinner oil also flows more freely when fully warmed-up to normal operating temperatures. And oil FLOW is lubrication, but oil pressure is NOT lubrication. Oil pressure is only a measurement of resistance to flow. Running thicker oil just to up the oil pressure is the wrong thing to do, because that only reduces oil flow/lubrication. Oil pressure in and of itself, is NOT what we are after.

• The more free flowing thinner oil will also drain back to the oil pan quicker than thicker oil. So, thinner oil can help maintain a higher oil level in the oil pan during operation, which keeps the oil pump pickup from possibly sucking air during braking and cornering.

•The old rule of thumb for desired oil pressure, that we should have at least 10 psi for every 1,000 rpm, pertains to, and is highly recommended for High Performance and Racing engines. Engine bearing clearances are primarily what determines the oil viscosity required for any given engine. (NOTE: Viscosity does NOT determine an oil’s wear protection capability, like many people think. Wear protection capability is determined by an oil’s additive package, which contains the extreme pressure anti-wear components. That is why 5W30 oils can perform so much better than thicker oils in my wear protection capability testing). But, whatever the bearing clearance, for High Performance and Racing engines, it is best to run the thinnest oil we can, that will still maintain at least the old rule of thumb oil pressure, even if that means using a high volume oil pump to achieve that. A high volume oil pump/thinner oil combo is much preferred over running a standard volume oil pump/thicker oil combo. Because oil “flow” is our goal for ideal oiling, NOT simply high oil pressure. So, one of the benefits of running a high volume oil pump, is that it will allow us to enjoy all the benefits of running thinner oil, while still maintaining desirable oil pressure.



I have been using two of the higher ranked oils on this list in my personal vehicles including our GMC. I have been very happy with the performance of 0w40 Mobile 1 (ranked #7) used in my Cad 500 powered GMCMH. I am thinking about going to (ranked #4) 5W30 Quaker State Ultimate Durability, dexos 1 – Gen 2, API SN “Plus”, synthetic (green bottle), because of it's higher wear rating. Both of these oils are available at local Walmarts at very reasonable pricing.

Just another way of looking at things. So, the above is FYI and all Just My Humble Opinion backed by a few facts that I found on the Web. Other opinions will vary.


Larry Smile
78 Royale w/500 Caddy
Menomonie, WI.

[Updated on: Sat, 13 June 2020 19:24]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355650 is a reply to message #355649] Sat, 13 June 2020 19:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Shafts and bushings are kept separated from each other by something known
as "a fluid wedge" created by the shearing away of oils by the unequal
speed of both surfaces. Viscosity has a bit to do with this, but I am not
sure just how much. Experts have never, ever agreed on this. I used to run
10w-30 H.D. Valvoline Dino oil in my 403 in my Royale, and my low oil
pressure at idle always bothered me. So I switched to 20w - 50 H.D.
Valvoline Dino oil. Much higher now at 140,000 miles on the clock.
Engines in current applications were manufactured with synthetics with
low viscosity in mind. Their clearances are wayyy tightened up compared to
our cast iron dinosaurs. They also rev a lot, lot higher. Over 2 1/2 times
higher than our Oldsmobiles do.
So, most of the writers for road and track and other similar
publications tout synthetic oils, because the companies advertise heavily
in their magazine. If you bite the hand that feeds you, you won't have a
job very long. Synthetics do a bang up job in engines designed for them. No
argument from me on that point.
Like I have always said. Opinions Vary. I appreciate your viewpoint.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 5:15 PM Larry via Gmclist
wrote:

> Here is an article entitled "Motor Oil Engineering Test Data". It is a
> long read with lots of repetition. Tests were run on 239 different oils or
> oils
> with after market additives. Oils are ranked by their ability to resist
> wear. An interesting read as most of the higher ranked oils are of
> relatively
> low viscosity. 5w30's, 0w20's etc. Here is a copy/paste of a section
> written about viscosity.
>
> SECTION 2 – MOTOR OIL VISCOSITY SELECTION
>
> THE BENEFITS OF USING THINNER OIL:
>
> • Thinner oil flows quicker at cold start-up to begin lubricating critical
> engine components much more quickly than thicker oil can. Most engine
> wear takes place during cold start-up before oil flow can reach all the
> components (the longer an engine has been sitting, the more of a concern
> this
> becomes), and during warm-up while the oil is still thicker and not
> flowing as freely as it does during normal hot operating temperature. So,
> quicker
> flowing thinner oil will help reduce start-up and warm-up engine wear,
> which is actually reducing wear overall.
>
> • The more free flowing thinner oil during cold start-up and warm-up, is
> also much less likely to cause the oil filter bypass to open up, compared
> to thicker oil. Of course if the bypass opened up, that would allow
> unfiltered oil to be pumped through the engine. The colder the ambient
> temperature, and the more rpm used when the engine is cold, the more
> important this becomes.
>
> • Thinner oil also flows more freely when fully warmed-up to normal
> operating temperatures. And oil FLOW is lubrication, but oil pressure is NOT
> lubrication. Oil pressure is only a measurement of resistance to flow.
> Running thicker oil just to up the oil pressure is the wrong thing to do,
> because that only reduces oil flow/lubrication. Oil pressure in and of
> itself, is NOT what we are after.
>
> • The more free flowing thinner oil will also drain back to the oil pan
> quicker than thicker oil. So, thinner oil can help maintain a higher oil
> level in the oil pan during operation, which keeps the oil pump pickup
> from possibly sucking air during braking and cornering.
>
> •The old rule of thumb for desired oil pressure, that we should have at
> least 10 psi for every 1,000 rpm, pertains to, and is highly recommended for
> High Performance and Racing engines. Engine bearing clearances are
> primarily what determines the oil viscosity required for any given engine.
> (NOTE:
> Viscosity does NOT determine an oil’s wear protection capability, like
> many people think. Wear protection capability is determined by an oil’s
> additive package, which contains the extreme pressure anti-wear
> components. That is why 5W30 oils can perform so much better than thicker
> oils in my
> wear protection capability testing). But, whatever the bearing clearance,
> for High Performance and Racing engines, it is best to run the thinnest oil
> we can, that will still maintain at least the old rule of thumb oil
> pressure, even if that means using a high volume oil pump to achieve that.
> A high
> volume oil pump/thinner oil combo is much preferred over running a
> standard volume oil pump/thicker oil combo. Because oil “flow” is our goal
> for
> ideal oiling, NOT simply high oil pressure. So, one of the benefits of
> running a high volume oil pump, is that it will allow us to enjoy all the
> benefits of running thinner oil, while still maintaining desirable oil
> pressure.
>
>
>
> I have been using two of the higher ranked oils on this list in my
> personal vehicles including our GMC. I have been very happy with the
> performance of
> 0w40 Mobile 1 (ranked #7) used in my Cad 500 powered GMCMH. I am thinking
> about going to (ranked #4) 5W30 Quaker State Ultimate Durability, dexos 1
> – Gen 2, API SN “Plus”, synthetic (green bottle), because of it's higher
> wear rating. Both of these oils are available at local Walmarts at very
> reasonable pricing.
>
> So, the above is all Just My Humble Opinion backed by a few facts that I
> found on the Web. Other opinions will vary.
> --
> Larry
> 78 Royale w/500 Caddy
> Menomonie, WI.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355653 is a reply to message #355628] Sat, 13 June 2020 19:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
This topic can go on till the cows come home as there is only a small
difference as to slight chang in viscosity.
Just use sun oil and worry about other more important things.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 5:41 PM James Hupy via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Shafts and bushings are kept separated from each other by something known
> as "a fluid wedge" created by the shearing away of oils by the unequal
> speed of both surfaces. Viscosity has a bit to do with this, but I am not
> sure just how much. Experts have never, ever agreed on this. I used to run
> 10w-30 H.D. Valvoline Dino oil in my 403 in my Royale, and my low oil
> pressure at idle always bothered me. So I switched to 20w - 50 H.D.
> Valvoline Dino oil. Much higher now at 140,000 miles on the clock.
> Engines in current applications were manufactured with synthetics with
> low viscosity in mind. Their clearances are wayyy tightened up compared to
> our cast iron dinosaurs. They also rev a lot, lot higher. Over 2 1/2 times
> higher than our Oldsmobiles do.
> So, most of the writers for road and track and other similar
> publications tout synthetic oils, because the companies advertise heavily
> in their magazine. If you bite the hand that feeds you, you won't have a
> job very long. Synthetics do a bang up job in engines designed for them. No
> argument from me on that point.
> Like I have always said. Opinions Vary. I appreciate your viewpoint.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Oregon
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 5:15 PM Larry via Gmclist
> wrote:
>
>> Here is an article entitled "Motor Oil Engineering Test Data". It is a
>> long read with lots of repetition. Tests were run on 239 different oils
> or
>> oils
>> with after market additives. Oils are ranked by their ability to resist
>> wear. An interesting read as most of the higher ranked oils are of
>> relatively
>> low viscosity. 5w30's, 0w20's etc. Here is a copy/paste of a section
>> written about viscosity.
>>
>> SECTION 2 – MOTOR OIL VISCOSITY SELECTION
>>
>> THE BENEFITS OF USING THINNER OIL:
>>
>> • Thinner oil flows quicker at cold start-up to begin lubricating
> critical
>> engine components much more quickly than thicker oil can. Most engine
>> wear takes place during cold start-up before oil flow can reach all the
>> components (the longer an engine has been sitting, the more of a concern
>> this
>> becomes), and during warm-up while the oil is still thicker and not
>> flowing as freely as it does during normal hot operating temperature. So,
>> quicker
>> flowing thinner oil will help reduce start-up and warm-up engine wear,
>> which is actually reducing wear overall.
>>
>> • The more free flowing thinner oil during cold start-up and warm-up, is
>> also much less likely to cause the oil filter bypass to open up, compared
>> to thicker oil. Of course if the bypass opened up, that would allow
>> unfiltered oil to be pumped through the engine. The colder the ambient
>> temperature, and the more rpm used when the engine is cold, the more
>> important this becomes.
>>
>> • Thinner oil also flows more freely when fully warmed-up to normal
>> operating temperatures. And oil FLOW is lubrication, but oil pressure is
> NOT
>> lubrication. Oil pressure is only a measurement of resistance to flow.
>> Running thicker oil just to up the oil pressure is the wrong thing to do,
>> because that only reduces oil flow/lubrication. Oil pressure in and of
>> itself, is NOT what we are after.
>>
>> • The more free flowing thinner oil will also drain back to the oil pan
>> quicker than thicker oil. So, thinner oil can help maintain a higher oil
>> level in the oil pan during operation, which keeps the oil pump pickup
>> from possibly sucking air during braking and cornering.
>>
>> •The old rule of thumb for desired oil pressure, that we should have at
>> least 10 psi for every 1,000 rpm, pertains to, and is highly recommended
> for
>> High Performance and Racing engines. Engine bearing clearances are
>> primarily what determines the oil viscosity required for any given
> engine.
>> (NOTE:
>> Viscosity does NOT determine an oil’s wear protection capability, like
>> many people think. Wear protection capability is determined by an oil’s
>> additive package, which contains the extreme pressure anti-wear
>> components. That is why 5W30 oils can perform so much better than thicker
>> oils in my
>> wear protection capability testing). But, whatever the bearing clearance,
>> for High Performance and Racing engines, it is best to run the thinnest
> oil
>> we can, that will still maintain at least the old rule of thumb oil
>> pressure, even if that means using a high volume oil pump to achieve
> that.
>> A high
>> volume oil pump/thinner oil combo is much preferred over running a
>> standard volume oil pump/thicker oil combo. Because oil “flow” is our
> goal
>> for
>> ideal oiling, NOT simply high oil pressure. So, one of the benefits of
>> running a high volume oil pump, is that it will allow us to enjoy all the
>> benefits of running thinner oil, while still maintaining desirable oil
>> pressure.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have been using two of the higher ranked oils on this list in my
>> personal vehicles including our GMC. I have been very happy with the
>> performance of
>> 0w40 Mobile 1 (ranked #7) used in my Cad 500 powered GMCMH. I am thinking
>> about going to (ranked #4) 5W30 Quaker State Ultimate Durability, dexos
> 1
>> – Gen 2, API SN “Plus”, synthetic (green bottle), because of it's higher
>> wear rating. Both of these oils are available at local Walmarts at very
>> reasonable pricing.
>>
>> So, the above is all Just My Humble Opinion backed by a few facts that I
>> found on the Web. Other opinions will vary.
>> --
>> Larry
>> 78 Royale w/500 Caddy
>> Menomonie, WI.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.gmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355899 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 20 June 2020 11:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Husker92592 is currently offline  Husker92592   United States
Messages: 137
Registered: August 2013
Location: Temecula ca
Karma: -4
Senior Member
So my question is synthetic oils cause your engine to leak?

1974 GMC Sequoia 26'
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355901 is a reply to message #355899] Sat, 20 June 2020 12:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Husker92592 wrote on Sat, 20 June 2020 12:10
So my question is synthetic oils cause your engine to leak?
Grant,

The simple answer is NO.
Unlike many situations, I do not know how this got started. While often times the dynamic viscosity is no different than specified, because the synthetic lubricants stay where they are distributed better, they often lead to an apparently higher lube oil consumption. This is a result of their presence on the combustion chamber walls.

I believe this may have started with owners changing to synthetic and them being more conscious of the 6$/quart than they were of the 2$/quart and that is understandable.

My recent overhaul has only leaked where I made some mistakes and took too long to correct them. (Shortly after restarting, she was loosing a quart every four hours until I got in there to find and make up the cooler line as it should have been.)

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Engine lubrication [message #355903 is a reply to message #355899] Sat, 20 June 2020 12:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Since the cold viscosity is thinner, it can leak more. Your not seeing the
leak as it is minor and the syn oil can cause more leakage at where it is
already leaking,

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 9:11 AM Grant Schaffer via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> So my question is synthetic oils cause your engine to leak?
> --
> 1974 GMC Sequoia 26'
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.gmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Engine lubrication [message #355906 is a reply to message #355626] Sat, 20 June 2020 14:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Just finished setting up the injector so it idles correctly. While I was fiddling with it, I set the max RPM to 4500. Should I have a problem on a hill on S, I'll turn it up a bit - but not much Smile

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] GMCMH-EFI eMails
Next Topic: 28SI Alternator vs 27SI
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 02 17:53:02 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02035 seconds