GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update)
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 10:21 Go to next message
THOMAS R WHITTON is currently offline  THOMAS R WHITTON   United States
Messages: 47
Registered: September 2016
Karma: -1
Member

Update on proportional valve replacement.
This is an update on replacing the proportional valve.  I  sprayed "witches brew" penetrating oil (50% acetone, 50% ATF) for four days.  On the fifth day I used a pencil torch on the line nuts to the valve then, while still hot and pushing the nut counter clockwise with a line wrench, I repeatedly hit the wrench where it was overlaying the nut with a hammer.  The line slowly came loose from the nut with each hammer blow.  The procedure worked on three of the five lines but didn't work on two.  (The first two I worked on and went to school on.)  Unfortunately, I cork screwed the two lines that run to the master cylinder and will be replacing them.  These lines run through several  tight spaces that I have made tighter by adding accessories over the years.  I could remove everything to run new brake lines but that would just make the job infinitely harder.
I got on Google for brake line lessons.  I'm impressed with the ease of working with NICOPP tubing (nickel-copper).  I watched the factory man and then a couple of real life mechanics.  NICOPP apparently has more than adequate PSI capacity, is easy to bend, flare and will not rust.  Do any of you have experience with this tubing?  What's the downside, if any? 
Here's one of my Google lessons: https://oppositelock.kinja.com/the-truth-about-copper-brake-lines-1818499200
I look forward to your thoughts.
Tom Whitton26 foot updated GMCPaducah, Ky



_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328683 is a reply to message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 10:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
I was trying to get you to heatit and soak it hot every day. Not just the last day.

If you had enough room, cut off the end of the two lines and flare them in place again.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328684 is a reply to message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 11:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mghamms is currently offline  mghamms   United States
Messages: 466
Registered: March 2016
Location: Ware, Massachusetts
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I haven't used it but looks like everyone sells it.
25 foot with15 fittings on Amazon for $21.00.


1977 Kingsley 455 as stock as it gets except lots of Ragusa parts
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328685 is a reply to message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 11:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
77Royale   United States
Messages: 461
Registered: June 2014
Location: Mid Michigan
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Ive used the Nicopp lines on my Coach, after a talk with Dave Lenzi. I got a better quality flaring tool and a tool to chamfer the ends. The Chamfering is critical to get the double flare correct. A little practice and it was not too bad. The Nicopp bends very easy and is easy to work with. Some of the stock lengths of line Advance Auto had did not have the correct nuts, so I got the nuts in a different pack and then installed those where needed.

The lines have been on for 3 years and no issues with leaking or rusting. The nuts themselves are a different metal from the lines, but I do not see any issues with the lines rusting to the nut, which is the problem most of the time.



77 Royale, Rear Dry Bath. 403, 3.55 Final Drive, Lenzi goodies, Patterson carb and dizzy. Mid Michigan
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328687 is a reply to message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 13:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wally is currently offline  wally   United States
Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Karma: 5
Senior Member
THOMAS R WHITTON wrote on Mon, 29 January 2018 10:21

Update on proportional valve replacement.
This is an update on replacing the proportional valve.  I  sprayed "witches brew" penetrating oil (50% acetone, 50% ATF) for four days.  On the fifth day I used a pencil torch on the line nuts to the valve then, while still hot and pushing the nut counter clockwise with a line wrench, I repeatedly hit the wrench where it was overlaying the nut with a hammer.  The line slowly came loose from the nut with each hammer blow.  The procedure worked on three of the five lines but didn't work on two.  (The first two I worked on and went to school on.)  Unfortunately, I cork screwed the two lines that run to the master cylinder and will be replacing them.  These lines run through several  tight spaces that I have made tighter by adding accessories over the years.  I could remove everything to run new brake lines but that would just make the job infinitely harder.
I got on Google for brake line lessons.  I'm impressed with the ease of working with NICOPP tubing (nickel-copper).  I watched the factory man and then a couple of real life mechanics.  NICOPP apparently has more than adequate PSI capacity, is easy to bend, flare and will not rust.  Do any of you have experience with this tubing?  What's the downside, if any? 
Here's one of my Google lessons: https://oppositelock.kinja.com/the-truth-about-copper-brake-lines-1818499200
I look forward to your thoughts.
Tom Whitton26 foot updated GMCPaducah, Ky



_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Nickel copper brake line is good stuff and easy to work with. Makes smooth easy double flares compared to steel. No rust no worry. I have a roll of 3/16 and 1/4 from Amazon.


Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328688 is a reply to message #328682] Mon, 29 January 2018 14:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
On Manny's advice, I got standard lengths from Advance for my transmission cooler lines. I'd do the same for brake lines - they bend fairly easily with a fifteen buck Harbor Freight bender. If I have to make brake lines to replace unruly ones (i'm following this thread closely, the valve is my next task) I'll cut the premade to the proper length and then borrow the flare tool from Advance - in the store. Nobody seems to ave success with the cheeapo flaring tool.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328690 is a reply to message #328688] Mon, 29 January 2018 16:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Keith V is currently offline  Keith V   United States
Messages: 2337
Registered: March 2008
Location: Mounds View,MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
No one seems to agree with me but I've given up on double flares. I only use them if I have to.

I now do everything with 37 degree flares.

Why?

The flare is dead simple to make, I have a cheap flaring too that works everytime

they are reusable ( double flares are not supposed to be reused )

Ive never had a leak


the only downside is the fittings are slightly more expensive.

________________________________
From: Gmclist on behalf of Johnny Bridges via Gmclist
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:04:35 PM
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Cc: Johnny Bridges
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update)

On Manny's advice, I got standard lengths from Advance for my transmission cooler lines. I'd do the same for brake lines - they bend fairly easily
with a fifteen buck Harbor Freight bender. If I have to make brake lines to replace unruly ones (i'm following this thread closely, the valve is my
next task) I'll cut the premade to the proper length and then borrow the flare tool from Advance - in the store. Nobody seems to ave success with the
cheeapo flaring tool.

--johnny
--
76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
"I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell" - ol Andy, paraphrased


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Keith Vasilakes
Mounds View. MN
75 ex Royale GMC
ask me about MicroLevel
Cell, 763-732-3419
My427v8@hotmail.com
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328696 is a reply to message #328690] Mon, 29 January 2018 20:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Keith V wrote on Mon, 29 January 2018 17:07
No one seems to agree with me but I've given up on double flares. I only use them if I have to.

I now do everything with 37 degree flares.

Why?

The flare is dead simple to make, I have a cheap flaring too that works everytime

they are reusable ( double flares are not supposed to be reused )

Ive never had a leak


the only downside is the fittings are slightly more expensive.


Kieth,

There is small problem with 37°(AN) flares in automotive hardware. There is a DOT spec that specifies 45° flares. Then there is the issue that much of the required hardware is simply not available in AN. I do still have the AN flare tool that I bought when I worked on power plants. It was expensive then. The real problem with double flares (pointed up in a ASTM study years ago) is that most that fail were not done right. This is sometimes the fault of the technician and sometimes the result of the poor tooling available. I believe that your attention to detail can make up for a less than great tool set.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update) [message #328705 is a reply to message #328696] Tue, 30 January 2018 08:55 Go to previous message
Keith V is currently offline  Keith V   United States
Messages: 2337
Registered: March 2008
Location: Mounds View,MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Yes there are times when it's hard or impossible to use AN fittings, so then I don't or will use an adapter or use a pre flared section.

As far as the DOT spec, that doesn't worry me much.

________________________________
From: Gmclist on behalf of Matt Colie
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 8:41:27 PM
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] GMCNet Portional Valve (update)

Keith V wrote on Mon, 29 January 2018 17:07
> No one seems to agree with me but I've given up on double flares. I only use them if I have to.
>
> I now do everything with 37 degree flares.
>
> Why?
>
> The flare is dead simple to make, I have a cheap flaring too that works everytime
>
> they are reusable ( double flares are not supposed to be reused )
>
> Ive never had a leak
>
>
> the only downside is the fittings are slightly more expensive.


Kieth,

There is small problem with 37°(AN) flares in automotive hardware. There is a DOT spec that specifies 45° flares. Then there is the issue that
much of the required hardware is simply not available in AN. I do still have the AN flare tool that I bought when I worked on power plants. It was
expensive then. The real problem with double flares (pointed up in a ASTM study years ago) is that most that fail were not done right. This is
sometimes the fault of the technician and sometimes the result of the poor tooling available. I believe that your attention to detail can make up for
a less than great tool set.

Matt
--
Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Keith Vasilakes
Mounds View. MN
75 ex Royale GMC
ask me about MicroLevel
Cell, 763-732-3419
My427v8@hotmail.com
Previous Topic: OFF TOPIC- NOT GMC - Long read
Next Topic: Wanted-- Fridge vent cover for Birchaven ~ 20" x 12"
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 02 20:12:15 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01966 seconds