GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions.
[GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277847] Thu, 14 May 2015 20:31 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member








This is an endless topic for discussion. I'd like to get some people to just think about this topic deeper. And no argument. Bob
60 years ago it was just let the oil fly. It's bound to lube everything at some point. It's become a science in it's own right. The manufactures are trying to get rid of every bit of power loss in the internal combustion engine they can. A 1/4 of a HP loss here. Another 1/5 there. It all adds up vary quickly. ( In my competition engines. I'm looking for every little pony I can find. Because being the first loser. Isn't as much fun as winning.) Sorry. Back to the subject at hand. Oil has mass. Mass has weight. And any extra oil that is in suspension. In the crank case, around the cam, and under the valve covers uses up horse power. The first order of business for oil is to keep all parts lubricated. Any extra oil be on that point is a source for power loss. A second use of that oil that's put into suspension. Is to help cool the pistons. And it doesn't take much oil to do that. Lets say you put 50% more oil into suspension to cool the pistons. That will only increase pisto
n cooling by 5 to 7%. And 403's or 455's have never had issues with to much heat build up in pistons. You don't want the oil control rings on the pistons to have to deal with too much extra oil. Engines that have to much oil in suspension. Will also burn more oil because the oil rings get over loaded. This also adds more mass to move. More power loss. In short. With excess bearing clearance. You will have an engine that burns oil. Rebuilt, or not.I've done alot of work in this area. As I build stock, and road race engines as a hobby. So you may say. That's different then what our 455's, and 403's engines do. SORRY. But the same laws of dynamics apply. I've put tiny camera's in all areas of the inside of engine's while running them on Dino's. I don't know of any GMC engine builders that have done this type of research. I've learned were, and how to put baffles to control oil.( My 403 will get a baffle some day. ) I've seen for myself how stock, and high volume pumps pe
rform under different conditions, and loads. In stock, and race engines. Some engines I build run 13 to 1 compression. Need 110 octane leaded fuel. Operate in the 6 to 8,000 RPM range all day long some times. Dino in the 240, to 250 HP range out of a 164 cubic inch GM engine. With no turbo assist. In these extreme engines. I shorten the length of the stock GM oil pump gears by 23 percent. Thus reducing the volume of that stock GM oil pump. I modify the relief valve, and spring. I want that pump to believer the amount of oil the engine needs to survive, plus 5% extra to go back to the bottom of the pan by way of the relief valve. With proper lubrication. Your main, rod, and cam bearings will never come in contact with any shaft. If you really want to increase the amount of oil passing thru your bearings. In a good condition engine. Increase the relief valve pressure. I just know that GM spent alot of time, and money to design the stock pump 40 some years ago. And o
ils are so much better over all those years. The HV pumps require 50% more horse power to run. And that extra oil is just pumped directly back into the bottom of the oil pan.There are some builders that put High volume pumps in all their rebuilt engines. That's fine. There are situations that they're useful. I've had engines that I've had extra oil go to the thrust bearing. The stock pump had the capacity to handle that. I'm not saying that these builders are wrong. But I'd like to see the data that a high volume pump is required in a mostly stock 403 or 455 engine is based on.As for oils. Use what you think is right for you. I use standard 10/30 oil for diesel engines. My 78 403 Royale with enclosed 24 ft trailer with car inside will gross out at around 20,000 lbs. My engine has never been rebuilt. And has 153,404 miles on it with a stock oil pump. A few years ago I pulled my oil pan to check the clearances of my mains, and rods. They were still at GM factory specs.
The people at GM knew what they were doing. Time has proven that. Bob Dunahugh Member GMCMI

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277848 is a reply to message #277847] Thu, 14 May 2015 21:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bwevers is currently offline  bwevers   United States
Messages: 597
Registered: October 2010
Location: San Jose
Karma: 5
Senior Member
If you watch Joe Mondello's video on Power Block TV, he says
that the oil drain back is poor on the stock engine. He grinds
the hole behind the timing chain to make oil flow down better
and lubricate the timing chain.

http://blog.powerblocktv.com/2-minute-tech-tips-from-joe-mondello-dr-olds-part-ii/

He also mentions having holes in the oil galley plugs. But
he doesn't say how big the hole in main oil galley plug should be.
The one on my engine is 0.055" and shoots a massive amount of oil
out the front into the timing chain and fuel pump eccentric. It
seems like more than enough to lube the chain. This is with
a stock pump turned by a hand drill. It can fill a water glass in seconds.


Bill Wevers GMC49ers, GMC Western States 1975 Glenbrook - Manny Powerdrive, OneTon 455 F Block, G heads San Jose
Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277850 is a reply to message #277847] Thu, 14 May 2015 22:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
Bob, how can a high volume oil pump HURT anything? other than a tiny bit of lost horsepower.

Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277856 is a reply to message #277850] Fri, 15 May 2015 08:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Larry is currently offline  Larry   United States
Messages: 2875
Registered: January 2004
Location: Menomonie, WI
Karma: 10
Senior Member
kerry pinkerton wrote on Thu, 14 May 2015 22:50
Bob, how can a high volume oil pump HURT anything? other than a tiny bit of lost horsepower.

Kerry,
If you are running a low RPM street motor, and If your motor has bearing clearances are on the high side, and especially if you have a high volume oil pump, you will push so much oil through the bearings that to much oil could get thrown on the cylinder walls. So much so that the rings won't be able to handle it, and you will end up burning more oil. I have seen motors that burned a lot of oil because the rod bearings were worn out..not because the rings were bad. If you insist on running a high volume oil pump on a older engine, expect that you will burn more oil. On a rebuild, some will cross drill a crank to get more oil to the bearings. If you do cross drill, plan to have clearances max at .0015 and preferably around .0010. Just what I have learned.


Larry Smile
78 Royale w/500 Caddy
Menomonie, WI.
Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277956 is a reply to message #277856] Sun, 17 May 2015 04:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Loffen is currently offline  Loffen   Norway
Messages: 1087
Registered: August 2013
Location: Norway
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Interesting subject especially since I am rebuilding my engine as we speak.

I have not decided if I will go for a HV pump or not, one of the reasons is that I have not found out if it would do any good or bad when it comes to long oil cooler lines and a external oil cooler.

But I have been thinking about the oil restrictors to the lifters/head and I do not like them, as I think that I will go with hydraulic roller lifters I would like to give them all the oil I can, however so am I a little bit worried about the oil return from the heads as I will do a lot of long low gear "high" rpm steep climbs.
So I did find sets of push rods at Mondello with a small oil feed hole and in my mind the should work just fine as oil restrictors to the cylinder heads, what do you guys think ?

http://www.mondellotwister.com/RockersPushrods.htm


1973 23' # 1848 Sky Blue Glacier called Baby Blue and a 1973 26'-3 # 1460 Parrot green Seqouia Known as the Big Green, And sold my 1973 26'-2 # 581 White Canyon lands under the name Dobbelt trøbbel in Norway
Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277962 is a reply to message #277956] Sun, 17 May 2015 09:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Harry is currently offline  Harry   Canada
Messages: 1888
Registered: October 2007
Location: Victoria, BC CANADA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Is a high volume oil pump the same as a high pressure pump?
If it is high volume, you can only squeeze so much oil through an opening.
High pressure would squeeze more oil through.
Yes?
Re: [GMCnet] : Engine oil control. There's alot more then just opinions. [message #277969 is a reply to message #277847] Sun, 17 May 2015 17:04 Go to previous message
Chris Tyler is currently offline  Chris Tyler   United States
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
Senior Member
No. Generally a high volume pump is larger, with more output per revolution [or stroke]
High pressure is a function of the relief spring


76 Glenbrook
Previous Topic: TZE266V101837
Next Topic: Several GMC's for Sale in Eastern Iowa / Western IL
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri May 17 23:08:36 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05098 seconds