GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » And now for a little side ways
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #318889 is a reply to message #318887] Mon, 12 June 2017 11:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
lqqkatjon is currently offline  lqqkatjon   United States
Messages: 2324
Registered: October 2010
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Ran 2011-2013 v-6 RAM vans. We had 8 of them and Inwould not wish the engine/drive train on my worst enemy. We
Still have 5 of the 8. And 2 of those 5 we do not use any more and should be auctioned off this fall. NONE have more then 200k miles on them, and most have experienced a tranny. Quite a few repairs I asked how service writer was able to look a mother of 4/5 kids in the face when he told them how much the repairs cost. The engine and base tranny maybe ok, as they cover that on warantee and everything that goes wrong are non-warented
Items.


Jon Roche 75 palm beach EBL EFI, manny headers, Micro Level, rebuilt most of coach now. St. Cloud, MN http://lqqkatjon.blogspot.com/
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #318890 is a reply to message #318887] Mon, 12 June 2017 11:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Handyman is currently offline  Handyman   Netherlands
Messages: 229
Registered: April 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Oké, that bigger 6 cyl engine is not available in europe, but that could do a better job.
I think that will be a chrysler engine in origine? Or did they order a 6 cyl turbo diesel from IVECO who has also very nice engines and even nicer full automated 7 speed transmissions. Their engines are also stronger then those from FIAT ...

Daniel


Daniel Jacobs, NL-USA 1977 GMC Eleganza II, Rebuild 455 (2019) 3.55 FD. FiTech and (Modified) FCC, Electric Pump, insulated GasTanks, 100A Alternator, APC, McDash, Schräder Valves + extern Fills, Ceramic Film, TPMS, FlexSteel Seats
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #318998 is a reply to message #318629] Wed, 14 June 2017 12:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
Not sure I'd want a transverse engine on anything doing heavy duty pulling...

Just throwing this out there, but the only other heavy duty, longitudinal drivetrain, front drive application I know of is some E-450 transit vans were converted to FWD. They use them here at the State Fair of Texas as parking lot shuttles. The FWD lets them lower the van floor for ease of entry. Some quick internet searching reveals they were common on transit busses in Canada as well. The Canadian ones are running old Navistar 7.3s and have some sort of a Carraro H.S. drivetrain running forward to what looks like a heavy duty Dana front axle. Not sure if the State fair busses also run the Carraro, but I can confirm by the sound they are definitely running 7.3s...

So as someone else here mentioned... Use a GM 1 Ton front end instead of the dana used on these fords powered by a driveshaft off of this Carraro unit... Either use an adapter or maybe Carrero has a GM Bellhousing pattern available.

Hal had also mentioned using a NP205 converted for FWD operation as another drivetrain option to get power from a longitudinal mount engine to the front wheels... Nice thing about that setup is NP205s are everywhere...

http://www.thedieselstop.com/forums/f14/odd-e450-bus-set-up-310304/

Here's one that was up for auction just a few days ago. Went for 1800 Canadian... If the 7.3 runs well, you should easily be able to get 1800 just for the engine. You'd end up with a nearly free drivetrain...

https://www.govdeals.com/index.cfm?fa=Main.Item&itemid=3&acctid=5511


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319000 is a reply to message #318998] Wed, 14 June 2017 12:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
TR 1 wrote on Wed, 14 June 2017 12:37
Not sure I'd want a transverse engine on anything doing heavy duty pulling...

Just throwing this out there, but the only other heavy duty, longitudinal drivetrain, front drive application I know of is some E-450 transit vans were converted to FWD. They use them here at the State Fair of Texas as parking lot shuttles. The FWD lets them lower the van floor for ease of entry. Some quick internet searching reveals they were common on transit busses in Canada as well. The Canadian ones are running old Navistar 7.3s and have some sort of a Carraro H.S. drivetrain running forward to what looks like a heavy duty Dana front axle. Not sure if the State fair busses also run the Carraro, but I can confirm by the sound they are definitely running 7.3s...

So as someone else here mentioned... Use a GM 1 Ton front end instead of the dana used on these fords powered by a driveshaft off of this Carraro unit... Either use an adapter or maybe Carrero has a GM Bellhousing pattern available.

Hal had also mentioned using a NP205 converted for FWD operation as another drivetrain option to get power from a longitudinal mount engine to the front wheels... Nice thing about that setup is NP205s are everywhere...

http://www.thedieselstop.com/forums/f14/odd-e450-bus-set-up-310304/

Here's one that was up for auction just a few days ago. Went for 1800 Canadian... If the 7.3 runs well, you should easily be able to get 1800 just for the engine. You'd end up with a nearly free drivetrain...

https://www.govdeals.com/index.cfm?fa=Main.Item&itemid=3&acctid=5511


Doing some more research, it looks like Carraro just makes the front axle. These busses are running a 4R100, same as any other heavy duty ford from that time... Would imagine then that they are running an NP205 as Hal suggested as well...


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319005 is a reply to message #318629] Wed, 14 June 2017 14:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
There may be alot of Canadian reference to the ELF para-transit buses because of this company located not far from me:

http://www.overlandcustomcoach.com/

In the "About" part of their home page there is reference to their introduction of the ELF (Economical Low Floor) para-transit bus. I'm not sure if they developed it or just were a Distributor for it.


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319010 is a reply to message #319005] Wed, 14 June 2017 15:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Keith V is currently offline  Keith V   United States
Messages: 2337
Registered: March 2008
Location: Mounds View,MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Man just take the Titian II and drop a GMC body on it.

How hard could it be??


http://www.overlandcustomcoach.com/titan-ii-lf

Titan II Low Floor Bus - Overland Custom Coach
www.overlandcustomcoach.com
The TITAN II LF (Low Floor) Passenger Capacity of up to 21 . The Glaval Titan II LF: Low Floor; Rear Wheel Drive; Purpose Built Chassis; Rugged Durability



________________________________
From: Gmclist on behalf of Bruce Hislop
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 2:29:43 PM
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways

There may be alot of Canadian reference to the ELF para-transit buses because of this company located not far from me:

http://www.overlandcustomcoach.com/

In the "About" part of their home page there is reference to their introduction of the ELF (Economical Low Floor) para-transit bus. I'm not sure if
they developed it or just were a Distributor for it.
--
Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
Hubler 1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Keith Vasilakes
Mounds View. MN
75 ex Royale GMC
ask me about MicroLevel
Cell, 763-732-3419
My427v8@hotmail.com
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319011 is a reply to message #319010] Wed, 14 June 2017 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Keith V wrote on Wed, 14 June 2017 15:41
Man just take the Titian II and drop a GMC body on it.
How hard could it be??

http://www.overlandcustomcoach.com/titan-ii-lf

Titan II Low Floor Bus - Overland Custom Coach
www.overlandcustomcoach.com
The TITAN II LF (Low Floor) Passenger Capacity of up to 21 . The Glaval Titan II LF: Low Floor; Rear Wheel Drive; Purpose Built Chassis; Rugged Durability

That one is rear wheel drive.

What you want is front wheel drive:

http://dallassmithcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/brochures/f-450-f-550-superlowfloorchassis.pdf
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319013 is a reply to message #319011] Wed, 14 June 2017 16:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
There you go... Looks like mostly Ford stuff, but I see a few GM chassis there...

Love to have an Allison 6 speed driving the front wheels on my GMC...

http://dallassmithcorp.com/products/specialty-vehicles/gallery-case-histories/#

I like the black F450 with the super single rear tire at the top of the page...


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319014 is a reply to message #318629] Wed, 14 June 2017 16:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Mark, other than the lack of traction - which we have now - what's the argument against a transverse front drive train?

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319018 is a reply to message #319014] Wed, 14 June 2017 17:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
I guess my main issue is there really aren't any "truly" heavy duty transverse engine transaxles out there... While the 4T80 may be an option, you're really asking it to do way more than it was ever designed to do pulling a GMC and possibly a towd around. I worked for Manheim Auto Auctions back in the 90s, and we had more than a few Caddys and Auroras with tranny issues come through... From what I remember, the casing just wasn't beefy enough to support the torque.

Really, by a large margin, the strongest front drive transaxle out there, is the one we already have... At least as far as I am aware. But then, compare even the TH425 to an Allison, or Ford 6R110, and I'm not a dodge guy, but whatever they use in the HD rams, and there is no contest. 1000 lbft of torque is no problem with those gearboxes. Not sure if a TH425 could be reasonably built to take that kind of torque, but I would bet it would not be easy...

To go with a gearbox weaker than we have already, does not seem like an upgrade to me. Even with the added overdrive.

Just my opinion...

Now, whatever they run in those front drive Texas State Fair vans, I'd have no problem putting in anything I own that hauls a load... I tried to find some pictures online but couldn't. Not only do they have the low floor bus chassis full of people, but they pull like a small train of 3 or so trailers with people on them as well. 105 degree heat, all day long.

Here are some more shots of that Canadian Overland shuttle bus. The Texas vans really look similar. They're running 10 bolt axles on them:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/r-flores/sets/72157628119573157/

-If- I ever go through the effort of a drivetrain swap on my GMC, there is no way I'm going through all that work and $$ to put in something that's not at least as tough as what I have in there already...


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319025 is a reply to message #318629] Wed, 14 June 2017 18:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
To Mike: the original poster:

Been reading these engine swap threads and there was some mention at one time of using an LS motor backed up with a TH425, but there was of course the issue with the oil pan having a halfshaft run through it...

Did you look into the Trailblazer SS Oil pan? Should bolt up to most LS engines...

http://www.improvedracing.com/oil-pans/oil-pan-for-chevrolet-ssr-trailblazer-gmc-envoy-saab-7x-p-401.html?gclid=CI_wotGvtQCFYaCswodUegC4w&utm_camp aign=googleproductsearchusen&utm_medium=product_search&utm_source=googleproductsearchusen


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319039 is a reply to message #318814] Wed, 14 June 2017 22:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hal StClair   United States
Messages: 971
Registered: March 2013
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Karma: -12
Senior Member
Mike S wrote on Sat, 10 June 2017 09:30
There seems to be some question about the strength of the 4T80e.

Keep in mind the progression at GM.

the 400/425 torque capacity morphed into the 4l80E/ 4T80E.

The L (longitudal) 4L80e was the trans of choice in the big block trucks. And had a reasonable decent reputation.

It was only the increase torque of the Duramax and 8.1 that a new, more robust trans was needed. The Allison.

The internals of the 4t80E match the 4l80E. The same as the internals of the 400 match the 425.

And yes. The chain is a limiter.

The real enemy is HEAT under sustain max load. Synthetics and a temp gauge go a long way to battling that enemy!




Actually, the 4t80e is 'morphed' from the TH125 trans first used in the X bodies, I believe. A little light for our use I'd guess.
Hal


"I enjoy talking to you. Your mind appeals to me. It resembles my own mind, except you happen to be insane." 1977 Royale 101348, 1977 Royale 101586, Diesel powered, 1974 Eagle Bus 45',w/slideout, Rio Rancho, NM
Re: And now for a little side ways [message #319042 is a reply to message #318629] Thu, 15 June 2017 05:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike S   United States
Messages: 82
Registered: February 2017
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Karma: 3
Member
Mark
The real trouble isn't the motor to the trans, it's the diff interferes with the pan rail by 1/2".
One guy milled the panrail down and ground a hole in the diff and JB welded back shut.
I have the LS in place with the diff by clocking the trans 22 degrees. But it won't clear the step or hatch.

What your are looking at can be done, look at Hal's,

The goal of this is "bolt-in" under the hatch. So anyone could do it.
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319056 is a reply to message #319013] Thu, 15 June 2017 11:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
TR 1 wrote on Wed, 14 June 2017 16:48
There you go... Looks like mostly Ford stuff, but I see a few GM chassis there...

Love to have an Allison 6 speed driving the front wheels on my GMC...

http://dallassmithcorp.com/products/specialty-vehicles/gallery-case-histories/#

I like the black F450 with the super single rear tire at the top of the page...

The one I linked to has ABS.
Another advantage is lower toll charges. Only two axles.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/data/1/medium/Dallas_Smith_Ford_F450_ZFrame_LoFloor_Suspension_Overlay.jpg
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319057 is a reply to message #319056] Thu, 15 June 2017 11:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
A Hamilto wrote on Thu, 15 June 2017 11:44
TR 1 wrote on Wed, 14 June 2017 16:48
There you go... Looks like mostly Ford stuff, but I see a few GM chassis there...

Love to have an Allison 6 speed driving the front wheels on my GMC...

http://dallassmithcorp.com/products/specialty-vehicles/gallery-case-histories/#

I like the black F450 with the super single rear tire at the top of the page...

The one I linked to has ABS.
Another advantage is lower toll charges. Only two axles.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/data/1/medium/Dallas_Smith_Ford_F450_ZFrame_LoFloor_Suspension_Overlay.jpg

Alternatively, if you want a 29' stretch, just make the GMC body 37" longer and drop it on the Ford chassis without shortening the Ford chassis.
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319077 is a reply to message #319057] Thu, 15 June 2017 17:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
richshoop is currently offline  richshoop   United States
Messages: 190
Registered: April 2017
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Assuming that drawing of the Ford Chassis is close to reality. It would require redesign of fuel tankage and black water tank.

----- Original Message -----

From: "A."
To: "gmclist"
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:57:16 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways

A Hamilto wrote on Thu, 15 June 2017 11:44
> TR 1 wrote on Wed, 14 June 2017 16:48
>> There you go... Looks like mostly Ford stuff, but I see a few GM chassis there...
>>
>> Love to have an Allison 6 speed driving the front wheels on my GMC...
>>
>> http://dallassmithcorp.com/products/specialty-vehicles/gallery-case-histories/#
>>
>> I like the black F450 with the super single rear tire at the top of the page...
>
> The one I linked to has ABS.
> Another advantage is lower toll charges. Only two axles.
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/data/1/medium/Dallas_Smith_Ford_F450_ZFrame_LoFloor_Suspension_Overlay.jpg

Alternatively, if you want a 29' stretch, just make the GMC body 37" longer and drop it on the Ford chassis without shortening the Ford chassis.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319078 is a reply to message #319077] Thu, 15 June 2017 18:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
richshoop wrote on Thu, 15 June 2017 17:33
Assuming that drawing of the Ford Chassis is close to reality. It would require redesign of fuel tankage and black water tank.

Yep. Other possibilities are; Connect the Ford front clip to the GMC rear frame and replace the spindles with something that will allow the rear wheels to match the front. Try to retain the GMC front subframe and graft only the drivetrain components into it.

Certainly way more trouble that it is worth. But everything fun always is.
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319092 is a reply to message #319078] Thu, 15 June 2017 21:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
richshoop is currently offline  richshoop   United States
Messages: 190
Registered: April 2017
Karma: 0
Senior Member
It would be safer to build a unique front clip that has the proper engine/trans support built in. Needs to be engineered. Before all that, need to find out if the longer term parts availability warrants the effort. Would something like this need to be passed through the DOT?
----- Original Message -----

From: "A."
To: "gmclist"
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:43:51 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways

richshoop wrote on Thu, 15 June 2017 17:33
> Assuming that drawing of the Ford Chassis is close to reality. It would require redesign of fuel tankage and black water tank.

Yep. Other possibilities are; Connect the Ford front clip to the GMC rear frame and replace the spindles with something that will allow the rear
wheels to match the front. Try to retain the GMC front subframe and graft only the drivetrain components into it.

Certainly way more trouble that it is worth. But everything fun always is.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319093 is a reply to message #319092] Thu, 15 June 2017 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
richshoop wrote on Thu, 15 June 2017 21:49
... Would something like this need to be passed through the DOT?...

Same as one-ton front end and rear disk brakes and reaction arms and body/frame stretches and....
Re: [GMCnet] And now for a little side ways [message #319095 is a reply to message #319093] Thu, 15 June 2017 23:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
hal kading is currently offline  hal kading   United States
Messages: 642
Registered: February 2004
Location: Las Cruces NM
Karma: 4
Senior Member
While we are making these changes, how about splitting the body down the middle and add 6 inches to the width. North NM Hal could give pointers on how to do it.

Southern NM Hal
Previous Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Picture of oem table between driver/passenger?
Next Topic: Picture of oem table between driver/passenger?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 06 11:45:50 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02486 seconds