GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Tanks are out, mechanic not happy (Random power loss, no cause found yet.)
Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352433] Wed, 26 February 2020 17:16 Go to next message
Bullitthead is currently offline  Bullitthead   United States
Messages: 1411
Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
Senior Member
I was expecting to find crushed, collapsed, or old, vacuum collapsible hose to account for the random power loss. No such luck...Now I will have to dig into the fuel tanks, which I guess I was going to do anyway. But now the possibilities have been narrowed down to the filter socks or pickup tubes in the tanks,or the device in the wheelwell that looks maladjusted.
Apparently, someone has been here before. The fuel lines are 30R7 and still flexible enough to disconnect without damage. The vent lines were stiff, the front tank filler neck hose snapped the paper thin nylon tee by the frame before I could get to the clamp even with my 18 inch extension. That hose would not have let go of that tee anyway Laughing The filler neck vent hose barb on that tank is also apparently the fuel leak when I fill the tanks and it drips out in front of the rear wheel for the first few hundred feet.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-system/p67071-fill-pipe-26amp-3b-vent-tee.html

This the top of the rear (Main) tank

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-system/p67074-rear-tank-top.html
All ins and outs accounted for except the one with a bolt clamped in the stubby hose on the side. Generator feed is the right angle fitting at corner, red capped port on top goes to filler neck vent. Sending unit has engine feed and canister lines. Anybody know what was the original purpose of the port closed off by the hose and bolt?
There is also a device in series with the rear tank vent line that is located in the LR forward wheelwell,don't have a pic of that yet, but even though the tank has 2 vents I wonder if it is the cause of the power loss. I think it's a gravity sensor to close the line between the tanks in case you remain on a steep angle for a long enough time. I'm going to perform some tests on it and get a pic to post in a reply once the workload clears.


Terry Kelpien ASE Master Technician 73 Glacier 260 Smithfield, Va.
Re: [GMCnet] Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352434 is a reply to message #352433] Wed, 26 February 2020 18:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Terry,
Since you have gone this far, cost of hoses is not much and get the
correct large hosed from the GMC Vendors as they will hav the ourrect.
Also replace the vent lins going to the Vapor separator and the
separator at the same time.
Possibly the cap might be defective as well.
Iknow you understand all that, but when we play with these most of the
time, we get little smart.
Give me a call so we can exchange info and resolve your issues.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:17 PM Terry via Gmclist
wrote:

> I was expecting to find crushed, collapsed, or old, vacuum collapsible
> hose to account for the random power loss. No such luck...Now I will have to
> dig into the fuel tanks, which I guess I was going to do anyway. But now
> the possibilities have been narrowed down to the filter socks or pickup
> tubes
> in the tanks,or the device in the wheelwell that looks maladjusted.
> Apparently, someone has been here before. The fuel lines are 30R7 and
> still flexible enough to disconnect without damage. The vent lines were
> stiff, the front tank filler neck hose snapped the paper thin nylon tee by
> the frame before I could get to the clamp even with my 18 inch extension.
> That hose would not have let go of that tee anyway :lol: The filler neck
> vent hose barb on that tank is also apparently the fuel leak when I fill the
> tanks and it drips out in front of the rear wheel for the first few
> hundred feet.
>
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-system/p67071-fill-pipe-26amp-3b-vent-tee.html
>
> This the top of the rear (Main) tank
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-system/p67074-rear-tank-top.html
> All ins and outs accounted for except the one with a bolt clamped in the
> stubby hose on the side. Generator feed is the right angle fitting at
> corner,
> red capped port on top goes to filler neck vent. Sending unit has engine
> feed and canister lines. Anybody know what was the original purpose of the
> port closed off by the hose and bolt?
> There is also a device in series with the rear tank vent line that is
> located in the LR forward wheelwell,don't have a pic of that yet, but even
> though the tank has 2 vents I wonder if it is the cause of the power loss.
> I think it's a gravity sensor to close the line between the tanks in case
> you remain on a steep angle for a long enough time. I'm going to perform
> some tests on it and get a pic to post in a reply once the workload clears.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.gmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352436 is a reply to message #352433] Wed, 26 February 2020 21:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Green machine is currently offline  Green machine   Canada
Messages: 184
Registered: July 2019
Location: North Vancouver BC
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Jim will answer any questions you may have better than I can but so you can stop scratching your head, at least for tonight, that extra port is not factory.

Shawn Harris North Vancouver, Canada 1977 Palm Beach 403
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352438 is a reply to message #352436] Wed, 26 February 2020 23:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
While the tanks ought to be re-hosed if they have not been done in a long time as your problem could be there. I really suspect you fuel starvation problem is one of sucking fuel rather the pushing fuel from the tanks to the engine.

The original design by GM was not the best. They used a mechanical suction pump mounted on the engine to draw fuel a long way from what I will call "remote mounted" tanks. It worked most of the time but with the reformation of gasoline since the 1970 and the addition of ethanol blended gasoline with the EPA 1.0 RVP waver to the gasoline companies for ethanol diluted fuel we have a potential problem waiting to happen. Modern vehicles do not suck gas from the tanks to the engine. They push the gasoline from the tanks to the engine and usually at much higher pressure than a carb engine can use.

So I am suggesting that you add an additional pump back near or inside the tanks to move fuel, under pressure, forward to the engine. The pump can be an on demand one using a switch inside, or can be run full time with the appropriate shut off circuit.

Some people have eliminated the mechanical pump completely and installed two electrical pumps. One at each tank. Others have left the mechanical pump installed and only added the electrical pump on the aux tank. So when the engine is stumbling they can simply select aux and turn on the boost pump using the same switch.

So go ahead and re-hose, but also consider installing a boost pump if you do not already have one.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352441 is a reply to message #352433] Thu, 27 February 2020 07:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Here's how I did it on my carbureted 23" :http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6198-cane-9-creek-rv-park-heflin-2c-al.html

* The Mr. Gasket pumps have an internal check valve, you don't need an external one.

* The supplied filters fail at the swaged seam, discard them and get the Wix exact replacements.

* You can use an oil pressure switch and the hot on start terminal of the starter solenoid or a Ford impact/rollover switch for safety.

* Blank flange the mechanical pump opening and screw a barbed adapter on the hard line to the carburetor for the pump flex line.

* Cap the tank selector valve and use the original hoses. This allows a return to stock quickly if you wish.

After the install I had no further vapor lock problems with the coach.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352442 is a reply to message #352438] Thu, 27 February 2020 08:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Terry,

As someone that had tanks down too many times:
*That plugged off stub was factory. Nobody knows what it was for. I believe it was intended as a fuel vent/return from a version of GMC fuel system prior to 1972. That was not needed when production started.
*No matter how good the fuel line you are handling looks and feels, replace it all with 30R14 while you have it all open. If you do not, you probably will later. I had two pieces that looked great but would not pass a vacuum test.
*Take the time to replace the entire fill vent (the other connection at the sender) with new line that move that T as high as you can. Just under the cab floor works OK.
*Any rubber you do not replace may come to be used against you in a court of law (aka bite your ass).
*** Remember that there is a piece that connects the front steel line to the engine fuel pump.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352444 is a reply to message #352433] Thu, 27 February 2020 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Mexico
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
My experience with 30R7 hose.

When my coach was waiting for the engine to be rebuilt in 2010, I had the tanks drop and all the lines replaced. In 2014 on the first trip out, the engine stalled within seconds of flipping to the Aux tank. It restarted when I flipped back to the Main tank. When I got home, I found the feed hose on top of the Aux had deteriorated and was sucking air. This 30R7 hose was only 4 years old!

This time I replaced the hoses on top with metal lines and all the rest with Gates Barricade hose.

JWID


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352449 is a reply to message #352438] Thu, 27 February 2020 13:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bullitthead is currently offline  Bullitthead   United States
Messages: 1411
Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
Senior Member
The P.O. already installed an exterior pump and eliminated the fuel valve, and I added a solenoid shutoff valve to eliminate the possibility of drawing air from the front tank while going up a long grade. Hose to front and engine pump replaced. Bought new engine pump but have not installed it yet as these type of pumps do not come back to life once they fail. Interesting story of the 30R7 installation, and I have a new full roll of 30R6 to replace the hoses with. Made in USA, it's rated for alcohol, but so was/is the 30R7. Using in on other vehicles too. Is that going to be bad in 4 years?
So what's the deal with the hosery? Greenie weenies making us use water-based hose? Laughing Matt said get 30R14, but how long is that going to last with whatever ends up being supplied to us as fuel? What about my 7 non-alcohol gasoline fueled vintage vehicles with whatever that fuel is composed of? I can just see the scenario of the old school fuel dissolving the inside of the new school hose happening to me, as I have BTDT a few times in the past. Thought I had this deal covered with the new 30R6 hose, but now starting to wonder.
Matt, that extra plugged off line still looks like a backyard fix to me, can't believe GM would do that... Confused
I'll bet the problem is going to be the device in the wheelwell, since I don't know what its function is yet.


Terry Kelpien ASE Master Technician 73 Glacier 260 Smithfield, Va.
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352450 is a reply to message #352449] Thu, 27 February 2020 13:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
The device in the wheel well is part of the vent system going to the charcoal canister(s) up front. It is a float valve that shuts off the vent line if gasoline gets into it. That device is called a vapor separator and is mounted up high so gasoline should not normally get into it. It if does then the valve shuts off the line to the canister(s).

I guess it is possible if that valve stuck closed that you could develop a vacuum in the tank as you drive, but really that line is suppose to vent fumes the opposite direction away from the tank. I do not know about pulling air back in to the tank in the opposite direction. If this is the problem it would be easy to prove. When it is failing, just let air in by loosening the filler cap.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352452 is a reply to message #352449] Thu, 27 February 2020 13:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
Ah, the vapor/fuel separator

https://corvetteparts.com/item/valve-fuel-vapor-separator-1971-1974

Also good at separating dollars from your wallet.


Dolph

DE AD0LF

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 26’ ex-PalmBeach
Howell EFI & EBL, Reaction Arms, Manny Transmission

“The Aluminum and Fiberglass Mistress"

> On Feb 27, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Terry via Gmclist wrote:
>
> The P.O. already installed an exterior pump and eliminated the fuel valve, and I added a solenoid shutoff valve to eliminate the possibility of
> drawing air from the front tank while going up a long grade. Hose to front and engine pump replaced. Bought new engine pump but have not installed it
> yet as these type of pumps do not come back to life once they fail. Interesting story of the 30R7 installation, and I have a new full roll of 30R6 to
> replace the hoses with. Made in USA, it's rated for alcohol, but so was/is the 30R7. Using in on other vehicles too. Is that going to be bad in 4
> years?
> So what's the deal with the hosery? Greenie weenies making us use water-based hose? :lol: Matt said get 30R14, but how long is that going to last
> with whatever ends up being supplied to us as fuel? What about my 7 non-alcohol gasoline fueled vintage vehicles with whatever that fuel is composed
> of? I can just see the scenario of the old school fuel dissolving the inside of the new school hose happening to me, as I have BTDT a few times in the
> past. Thought I had this deal covered with the new 30R6 hose, but now starting to wonder.
> Matt, that extra plugged off line still looks like a backyard fix to me, can't believe GM would do that... :?
> I'll bet the problem is going to be the device in the wheelwell, since I don't know what its function is yet.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: Tanks are out, mechanic not happy [message #352456 is a reply to message #352433] Thu, 27 February 2020 14:54 Go to previous message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Quick and dirty test.. take the saparator off the wheel well and shake it - rattle? OK. No cracks in the plastic? OK. Silent? Get another onwe or open that one and correct the problem.

--johnny

Sake me I rattle, squeeze me....


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Previous Topic: Fridge Defend by ARP
Next Topic: I want to purchase a set of Leigh Harrison Middle Axle Disk Brakes in Good Condition
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 06 11:45:19 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05004 seconds