GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Oh, Sure, Another Fan Clutch
Re: [GMCnet] Oh, Sure, Another Fan Clutch [message #247395 is a reply to message #247393] Mon, 14 April 2014 13:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
An idea that has popped into my head from time to time is an identical
blade configuration to what we now have with a full coverage shroud with
diffusers between the grill and radiator, much like the 77-78 coaches have.
The differences being that the fan hub, instead of a viscous clutch, has a
thermostatically modulated feathering mechanism similar to an aircraft
propeller. One of the GMC CASCADERS builds a feathering hub for a turboprop
engine that he builds for homebuilt aircraft utilizing an APU from a
Chinook twin rotor helicopter. It looks robust enough to me for feathering
a coolant fan. What do you all think? Please don't slay the messenger, I am
just in the idea phase of this deal.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403
On Apr 14, 2014 11:07 AM, "Les Burt" <lburt@videotron.ca> wrote:

>
>
> Patrick,
> A very interesting example that brings a few thoughts to mind.
>
> Moving air with a fan takes horsepower, the higher the air flow being
> moved, the higher the HP consumed. I don't have exact facts to quote, but I
> do believe that the OEM fans on our coaches consume several HP because of
> the air they need to move. Trying to produce the equivalent airflow with
> electric fans is going to require a fairly hefty electrical output
> (possibly 150-200a?) to supply 1 or 2 powerful fan motors, or several
> smaller units. This is what I believe is the limiting factor in converting
> our coaches.
>
> The Buses with electric fans are probably not using them because they cool
> better, but because they are an easier system to implement and maintain.
> Running electrical wires and coolant hoses through tight quarters and
> around corners presents fewer difficulties than routing mechanical power in
> the same environment. Hydraulic fans are similar to Electric in that
> respect.
>
>
>
>
> fitzmorrispr wrote on Sat, 12 April 2014 23:59
> > There is one question I can answer in here. "Can an all electric fan
> setup
> > cool our rigs properly?"
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > Evidence?
> >
> > The local transit agency, LA County's Metro, uses all electric cooling on
> > their 45 foot NABI CompoBuses. These units are running large inline 6
> > turbocharged CNG engines. And by large I do mean large. Upwards of 8
> > liters, as I recall.
> >
> > Being rear engined, with a longitudinally mounted engine, the radiator is
> > alongside the block, much like it would be in a small transverse mounted
> > fwd car, but with lots more room. Electric is not even close to the only
> > option. Many of the older buses in their fleet, such as older New Flyers
> > and NABIs use other setups. One example runs a very long belt across the
> > back of the compartment to a pulley on a long shaft, which runs into a
> > gearbox on the back of the fan. Another runs the fan off the (gear
> driven)
> > power steering pump. This hydraulic fan was powerful enough to pull you
> off
> > balance if you happened to be next to the radiator. On similarly built
> > diesel school buses, I have seen setups where the radiator is mounted
> > diagonally in a box, so the fan can be directly belt driven, while the
> air
> > is pulled from alongside the engine.
> >
> > The cooling needs of the compobus are much the same as these other
> variants
> > I've mentioned, but the compobus uses electric fans, and has no cooling
> > issues. It uses an array of nine small fans mounted directly to the
> > radiator. They look like computer fans.
> >
> > Just my loose change.
> > -Patrick
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
>
> --
> Les Burt
> Montreal
> 1975 Eleganza 26ft
> A work in Progress
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Re-doing my waste system
Next Topic: Switching off the house battery charger
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 31 19:39:00 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02543 seconds